Menú
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, placing them in Figma or a local folder, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings from that evidence. Use when the user asks to audit, critique, review, inspect, assess, or evaluate a product experience.
Generate image-based visual alternatives, remixes, or concept directions after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief. Use when the user asks for design variants, visual exploration, remixes, or image-generated approaches from provided context.
Implement a selected image, screenshot, mockup, or Image Gen reference as a faithful responsive frontend after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief.
Use to discover specific skills for the Product Design plugin, when it is at-mentioned directly, or for any mentions of potentially relevant work, including: UX research; product, screen, or flow audits; visual ideation; app or interface design, redesign, cloning, prototyping, or implementation from ideas, URLs, images, Figma, or code; design QA; and prototype sharing or deployment.
Route coded prototype requests after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief. Use for building prototypes from URLs, images, mockups, Figma, existing code, or ideas that need visual exploration before build.
Clone a live URL as a runnable frontend-only local app using Browser/Chrome source evidence after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief.
| id | requesting-code-review |
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements |
| context | inline |
| version | 1 |
| source_repo | obra/superpowers |
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:
Use Task tool with general-purpose type, fill template at code-reviewer.md
Placeholders:
{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary of what you built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
Subagent-Driven Development:
Executing Plans:
Ad-Hoc Development:
Never:
If reviewer wrong:
See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md