con un clic
tdd-workflow
Test-Driven Development workflow principles. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Menú
Test-Driven Development workflow principles. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Generate descriptive Japanese commit messages by analyzing git diffs with Conventional Commits. Use when the user asks for help writing commit messages, reviewing staged changes, or preparing a commit command.
Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash |
| description | Test-Driven Development workflow principles. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. |
| metadata | {"github-path":"skills/tdd-workflow","github-ref":"refs/heads/master","github-repo":"https://github.com/masakiaota/dotfiles","github-tree-sha":"c748bd1c41b46d017066f9e4fb6262a69d0e75fc"} |
| name | tdd-workflow |
Write tests first, code second.
🔴 RED → Write failing test
↓
🟢 GREEN → Write minimal code to pass
↓
🔵 REFACTOR → Improve code quality
↓
Repeat...
| Focus | Example |
|---|---|
| Behavior | "should add two numbers" |
| Edge cases | "should handle empty input" |
| Error states | "should throw for invalid data" |
| Principle | Meaning |
|---|---|
| YAGNI | You Aren't Gonna Need It |
| Simplest thing | Write the minimum to pass |
| No optimization | Just make it work |
| Area | Action |
|---|---|
| Duplication | Extract common code |
| Naming | Make intent clear |
| Structure | Improve organization |
| Complexity | Simplify logic |
Every test follows:
| Step | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Arrange | Set up test data |
| Act | Execute code under test |
| Assert | Verify expected outcome |
| Scenario | TDD Value |
|---|---|
| New feature | High |
| Bug fix | High (write test first) |
| Complex logic | High |
| Exploratory | Low (spike, then TDD) |
| UI layout | Low |
| Priority | Test Type |
|---|---|
| 1 | Happy path |
| 2 | Error cases |
| 3 | Edge cases |
| 4 | Performance |
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
|---|---|
| Skip the RED phase | Watch test fail first |
| Write tests after | Write tests before |
| Over-engineer initial | Keep it simple |
| Multiple asserts | One behavior per test |
| Test implementation | Test behavior |
| Agent | Role |
|---|---|
| Agent A | Write failing tests (RED) |
| Agent B | Implement to pass (GREEN) |
| Agent C | Optimize (REFACTOR) |
Remember: The test is the specification. If you can't write a test, you don't understand the requirement.