harness-test-writer

name	harness-test-writer
description	Add regression test cases to the Bifrost provider harness (the Postman collection run via `make run-provider-harness-test`) based on a merged PR or a GitHub issue. Fetches the PR/issue, traces the affected wire path in the codebase, checks existing harness coverage, designs cases following harness conventions, inserts them into tests/e2e/api/collections/provider-harness.json without reformatting the file, and validates via the augment and filter scripts. Invoked with /harness-test-writer <PR# | issue# | URL> or /harness-test-writer (prompts for a reference).
allowed-tools	Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebFetch, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Edit, Write

Provider Harness Test Writer

Turn a PR or GitHub issue into regression coverage in the provider harness: the Postman collection at tests/e2e/api/collections/provider-harness.json, executed by newman via make run-provider-harness-test.

This is NOT the Go test harness in core/internal/llmtests/ (that one is run via make test-core PROVIDER=...). If the user seems to want Go-level scenario tests, confirm before proceeding.

Step 1 - Resolve the reference

The argument may be a PR number, an issue number, or a GitHub URL.

• URL containing /pull/ => PR. URL containing /issues/ => issue.
• A bare number is ambiguous: try gh pr view <N> --repo maximhq/bifrost first; if it 404s, try gh issue view <N>. If BOTH exist and refer to different things, ask the user which one they mean with AskUserQuestion.
• No argument at all => ask the user for the PR/issue reference.

Fetch full context:

gh pr view <N> --repo maximhq/bifrost --json title,body,state,files,baseRefName
gh pr diff <N> --repo maximhq/bifrost
# or
gh issue view <N> --repo maximhq/bifrost --json title,body,state,labels,comments

For a PR, also note any Closes #X issue and fetch that issue too - the issue usually contains the client-visible reproduction (exact request shapes, error bodies, status codes) that the harness case must mirror.

Step 2 - Understand the wire-level behavior to pin

The harness tests Bifrost from the outside: HTTP requests against gateway routes, with assertions on status codes and response/SSE bodies. Translate the PR/issue into that frame:

1. Which route(s)? (/v1/chat/completions, /v1/responses, drop-ins like /openai, /anthropic, /bedrock, /genai, passthrough routes, ...)
2. Which provider(s) and model(s)?
3. What request shape triggers the bug/feature? Reconstruct it from the issue repro or from the code path in the diff (read the changed functions and their callers).
4. What is the observable failure signature before the fix (status code, error body substring) and the expected behavior after?

Trace the chain in code with Grep/Read until you can state it in one sentence, e.g.: "x-bf-compat header -> compat plugin marks ChangeRequestType=ResponsesRequest -> ToResponsesRequest() -> ToOpenAIResponsesRequest strips role -> OpenAI 200".

Useful switches the harness relies on:

• x-bf-compat header: true enables all compat features; a JSON array like ["convert_chat_to_responses"] enables only specific ones (parsed in transports/bifrost-http/lib/ctx.go, consumed by plugins/compat/main.go). Prefer the targeted array form in regression cases so only the feature under test is active. Note: when the suite runs with COMPAT=on, a collection-level prerequest script upserts x-bf-compat: true over any per-request value - the targeted form matters for COMPAT=off runs, which is exactly when a forced-conversion case needs it.
• x-bf-passthrough-extra-params: true for passthrough extra-param cases.

Step 3 - Check existing coverage

Search the collection for the feature's keywords before writing anything:

cd tests/e2e/api
grep -c '<keyword>' collections/provider-harness.json
node -e "
const c = require('./collections/provider-harness.json');
function walk(items, path) { for (const it of items) {
  if (it.item) walk(it.item, path + '/' + it.name);
  else if (JSON.stringify(it).includes('<keyword>')) console.log(path + ' :: ' + it.name);
} }
walk(c.item, '');"

Also skim HARNESS_COVERAGE_BACKLOG.md - if the gap is listed there as [ ], flip it to [x] as part of the change (and if you find adjacent gaps worth noting, leave them, do not scope-creep).

If coverage already exists, report where and stop - do not add duplicates.

Step 4 - Design the cases

Conventions (match the existing collection exactly):

• Folder: issue-pinned regressions get their own top-level folder named <N>. <Short Title> (#<issue> / PR #<pr>) where <N> is the next unused top-level number (folders 17, 18, 19 are prior examples). Give the folder a description explaining the bug, the production path, and what each case pins.
• Case names must contain the provider keyword and model so runners/filter-collection.mjs PROVIDER filtering catches them - check PROVIDER_KEYWORDS in that file (e.g. openai matches "openai", "gpt-"). Suffix each name with - #<issue>.
• Coverage shape: typically 2-3 cases - the real production route (non-streaming), a streaming variant if the route streams, and where applicable a second route that pins the same invariant independently (e.g. native /v1/responses alongside the converted /v1/chat/completions path).
• Test scripts (Postman event[].script.exec, plain ES5 JavaScript):
  • Start with an infra guard so auth/rate/server noise skips instead of false-failing: if ([401, 403, 429, 500, 502, 503, 504].indexOf(pm.response.code) !== -1) { return; } Do NOT guard on 400 when a 400 IS the regression signature - that must fail loudly.
  • Assert the specific failure signature is absent (error substring, param name) AND that the happy path succeeded (status below 400, expected fields present).
  • Include the response text in failure messages: pm.expect(pm.response.code, 'failed: ' + pm.response.text()).to.be.below(400);
• Variables: use {{baseUrl}} for the gateway. Inline provider/model strings (e.g. openai/gpt-4o-mini) like the cross-cut folders do; only use variables such as {{bedrockModel}}, {{genaiModel}}, {{vertexModel}} where existing folders do.
• Keep request bodies minimal and cheap (small max_tokens/max_output_tokens, gpt-4o-mini-class models) - the harness runs as a paid live sweep.

Present the designed cases (names, route, body, assertions) to the user for approval before editing the collection.

Step 5 - Insert without reformatting

CRITICAL: provider-harness.json is ~1.5MB and is NOT byte-stable under JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(raw), null, 2) (escape differences). Never rewrite the whole file - the diff must contain only your added lines.

Use a Node script that appends the new folder textually before the closing ] of the top-level item array:

const raw = fs.readFileSync(PATH, 'utf8');
const before = JSON.parse(raw);
// abort if the folder already exists (idempotence)
const indented = JSON.stringify(folder, null, 2).split('\n').map(l => '    ' + l).join('\n');
const tail = '\n  ]\n}';
if (!raw.endsWith(tail)) throw new Error('unexpected file tail');
const out = raw.slice(0, -tail.length) + ',\n' + indented + tail;
const after = JSON.parse(out); // must parse; item count must be before + 1
fs.writeFileSync(PATH, out);

Adding cases INSIDE an existing folder is harder to do textually; if that is truly the right placement, locate the folder's closing bracket precisely and verify the diff is additions-only afterward. Default to a new top-level folder for issue regressions.

Step 6 - Validate

All from tests/e2e/api/:

git diff --stat   # must show only additions in provider-harness.json (+ backlog md if touched)
node runners/augment-provider-harness.mjs --source collections/provider-harness.json --out /tmp/aug.json
node runners/filter-collection.mjs --source /tmp/aug.json --out /tmp/filtered.json --provider <provider>
node -e "const c=require('/tmp/filtered.json'); const f=c.item.find(i=>i.name.startsWith('<N>.')); console.log('kept:', !!f, f && f.item.length);"

The augment script only regenerates its own "(generated)" folders, so a new top-level folder passes through untouched - but run it anyway to catch parse breakage.

Do NOT auto-run the live suite: it starts a gateway and makes paid provider calls. Report the run command and offer to execute it:

make run-provider-harness-test PROVIDER=<provider> FEATURE="<distinctive keyword from your case names>"

Step 7 - Report

Summarize: what the PR/issue changed, the coverage gap found (cite evidence, e.g. "tool_call_id appeared zero times in the collection"), each added case and what it pins, validation results, and the run command. Leave the change unstaged - never commit.