| name | mb-review |
| description | Review a Memory Bank with fresh-context specialists and produce a prioritized fix list.
|
mb-review — Multi-expert Memory Bank review
- What it does: runs independent reviewers over architecture, scope, task planning, security, and Memory Bank discipline.
- Use it when: you need a clean review gate before execution, after bootstrap, or before trusting the docs.
- Input: an existing
.memory-bank/.
- Output: reviewer reports in
.tasks/TASK-MB-REVIEW/ plus a synthesized list of fixes and review verdicts.
Goal
Detect gaps, contradictions, broken traceability, and non-compliance early.
This is not the same as per-task semantic verification.
Use mb-red-verify when the question is “did this task solve the right problem in substance?”
Preconditions
Process
1) Create review task folder
Create:
2) Spawn reviewers (fresh contexts)
Spawn these subagents in parallel (max 5–7):
- Architect —
./agents/shared-review-architect.md
- Scope/RTM —
./agents/shared-review-scope.md
- Task planning —
./agents/shared-review-plan.md
- Security —
./agents/shared-review-security.md
- MBB compliance —
./agents/shared-mb-reviewer.md
- Code quality (conditional: if repo has code) —
./agents/shared-review-code.md
Each reviewer must:
- write a detailed report to
.tasks/TASK-MB-REVIEW/
- return only a short summary + verdict to the orchestrator
3) Synthesize and decide
As orchestrator:
- combine findings
- deduplicate
- rank issues P0–P3
- produce a concrete fix plan
If the repo is preparing for /autonomous:
- treat unresolved P0/P1 issues as blocking
- do not allow batch execution until the final verdict is
APPROVE
4) Gate
If any reviewer returns REJECT:
Definition of done
.tasks/TASK-MB-REVIEW/ contains the reviewer reports.
- Orchestrator produced an actionable prioritized fix list.
- Final verdict: APPROVE.