| name | content-style-review |
| description | Review structure, readability, and persuasion in a draft without changing the author's core voice. Use when Codex needs to tighten a short-form or long-form editorial draft such as a LinkedIn post, blog article, reply, or other narrative copy after a usable draft exists and in the position defined by the active writer workflow. |
Content Style Review
Focus on structure and readability, not on identity or factual verification. Follow the active writer workflow for the exact place of this pass in the sequence.
Read
- the active writer skill's workflow file
- the active writer skill's review-passes file
- the active writer skill's format-playbooks file if one exists
- the active Ink profile contract when profile routing is needed
../social-common/references/repetition-guard.md
Use
- the copy clarity and specificity principles from
../copywriting/SKILL.md
- the format rules in the active writer playbooks
Check
- hook strength
- one clear core idea or throughline
- section and paragraph flow
- prose-first flow instead of list-shaped scaffolding
- proof and specificity
- close quality
- unnecessary repetition
- repeated openings, closes, transitions, sentence shapes, and claims across the current draft and relevant corpus examples
- for blog articles,
--- between major sections when clearer pacing needs it
Guardrails
- do not rewrite into a landing page
- do not make every close promotional
- do not turn prose into bullets just because it looks tidier
- for blog articles, do not polish away the sharper editorial edge into generic SaaS content
- do not override the selected profile corpus voice for the sake of polish
- do not fix repetition by sanding the draft into generic copy
Output
Return:
- the tightened draft
- the main structure or clarity changes
- any repeated wording or sentence pattern you removed
