| name | oiticica-cacophony |
| description | Apply Oiticica's cacophony concept in modern English with concise rules, objective rubrics, and concrete contrast. |
Oiticica Cacophony
Use this skill when reviewing or rewriting English prose where cacophony is the controlling issue.
Source concept: Cacophony is an ugly or inconvenient sound produced by word contact.
Rules
- Find accidental obscene, comic, or clumsy sound joins.
- Revise word order or choose a synonym only enough to remove the collision.
- Ignore harmless contact when the sentence reads naturally.
- Do not make the sentence less exact merely to avoid a faint sound echo.
Review Shape
Use the source-model shape for strong models:
Principle:
<oiticica-cacophony: one sentence naming the concept>
Preserve:
<supplied example text>
Why:
<why the model satisfies the concept>
Rubric:
<at least two objective checks, each marked Pass or Fail>
Use the repair shape for weak passages:
Principle:
<oiticica-cacophony: one sentence naming the concept>
Weak:
<small passage or paraphrase>
Fault:
<name the exact broken relation>
Better:
<corrected version>
Why:
<explain how the revision restores the relation>
Rubric:
<at least two objective checks, each marked Pass or Fail>
Start Principle with the exact skill name oiticica-cacophony.
If the prompt says source-model or source-model paraphrase, copy the supplied example in Preserve and do not use repair headings.
Objective Rubric
- The offending sound is local and demonstrable by reading aloud.
- The revision removes that sound.
- Meaning and register remain intact.
- The review does not over-police ordinary English joins.
Pass only when every applicable check passes. If correctness fails, fix or name that failure before judging style.
English Rule
Apply modern English grammar, punctuation, morphology, idiom, and prosody. Do not transfer Portuguese orthography or grammar into English.
Source Boundary
Source notes live in references/notes.md.
Do not invent source quotations. If an example is labeled as a paraphrase or invented passage, preserve that boundary in the review.
When a task asks for a Preserve section, copy the supplied example text exactly; do not replace it with imagined source prose.