Self-evaluation loop for the treadmill Claude plugins pack. Runs cursor-plugin-evals against bundled skills, tracks quality over time, and escalates recurring failures via PAMS. Use periodically or before publishing plugin updates.
Autonomously implement technical plans from context/changes/<change-id>/plan.md under Codex's /goal — no human interaction at any point. Sibling of /shape-implement for unattended runs, in an interactive /goal session or headless via Codex -p. Flips the plan's Automated Progress rows, verifies each phase through an automatic quality-gate stack (plan success criteria, deliberate-break check, full suite), commits each phase on green with Conventional Commits, and surfaces pending Manual rows as a closing human checklist. Use when the user wants autonomous or unattended plan execution, pairs /goal with a plan, asks to "run the plan under /goal", or needs headless implementation.
Review implementation against plan for drift, dangerous decisions, and pattern compliance
Implement technical plans from context/changes/<change-id>/plan.md with verification
Review implementation plans for substance, feasibility, and architectural fitness. Use when user asks to review a plan, says "is this plan good", "check my plan", "review this plan", mentions plan review, or references a plan file and asks for feedback. Also trigger when user finishes /shape-plan and wants validation before starting /shape-implement.
Drive an approved implementation plan to completion phase by phase, test-first, through the red→green→refactor cycle, but only for phases whose implementation does not exist yet. Reads a plan from context/changes/<change-id>/plan.md and the canonical Progress section, and for each phase first checks whether the phase is TDD'able and still unimplemented — if it is, you write a failing test (RED), make it pass with the minimal code (GREEN), then clean up (REFACTOR); if it is not TDD'able, you redirect that phase to /shape-implement; if implementation is already present, you stop and explain that TDD does not work for already existing code, then suggest /shape-implement for that phase. Mirrors /shape-implement (same plan, same Progress source of truth, same phase-end commit ritual and clipboard handoffs) but flips the order so the failing test always comes before the code. Assumes test infrastructure is already in place — it does NOT set up runners, configs, fixtures, or CI. Use this skill when the user says "td
Run implementation review non-interactively in CI against a PR: discovers the plan, checks drift/safety/patterns/test coverage, writes context/changes/<change-id>/reviews/impl-review.md, commits it to the PR branch, and posts a summary comment. Use whenever the request mentions CI, GitHub Actions, GHA, Codex Action, automated PR review, or "review this PR in CI".
Generate context/foundation/roadmap.md from a PRD as an ordered set of vertical, end-to-end slices. Use AFTER /shape-prd (and after the tech-stack selection / bootstrap step, when applicable) to turn a holistic PRD into a sequence of user-visible milestones a programmer can pick off and hand to /shape-plan. Trigger phrases: "write the roadmap", "generate roadmap", "create the roadmap from PRD", "stwórz roadmapę", "turn PRD into a roadmap", "what should I build first". Do NOT use for per-change planning — that's /shape-plan's job.