| name | review |
| aliases | ["/review","code review","review code","review pr"] |
| primaryRole | reviewer |
| description | Performs a structured evidence-based code review with severity ratings. Use when the user asks for PR review, code audit, or change assessment. |
Review evaluates correctness, security, maintainability, and test confidence before merge.
<Use_When>
- User asks for PR review, code audit, or change assessment
- You need release-readiness confidence and concrete findings
</Use_When>
<Execution_Policy>
- Prioritize defects over style opinions
- Every finding must include evidence (file and behavior impact)
- Rank findings by severity: critical/high/medium/low
- Include missing tests and verification gaps
</Execution_Policy>
1. Correctness: edge cases, state transitions, null/undefined handling
2. Security: injection vectors, authz/authn gaps, secret handling
3. Reliability: retries/timeouts, error propagation, race conditions
4. Maintainability: coupling, duplication, naming clarity, complexity
5. Test Adequacy: missing coverage, flaky risk, weak assertions
<Output_Format>
Review Summary
Critical
High
Medium
Low / Suggestions
Verification Gaps
Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}
