dw-02-research

name	dw-02-research
description	Use when you have research questions from deep-work Phase 1. Objectively investigates the codebase to answer pasted questions without access to the original task description.

Phase 2: Research

Objectively answer every research question by investigating the codebase. Document what IS, not what should be. You are a documentarian, not a critic.

Announce at start: "Starting deep-work Phase 2: Research."

BIAS FIREWALL — CRITICAL CONSTRAINTS

You MUST NOT:

• Read, open, or cat 00-ticket.md directly — ever
• Ask what the user is trying to build
• Infer or guess the user's intent
• Suggest improvements, solutions, or approaches

You MUST:

• Obtain research questions ONLY via the extract-research-questions.sh script (see Pre-flight Step 4) or from user-pasted text
• Treat the extracted questions as your complete and only input — do not seek additional context
• Answer ONLY the questions as written

Setup

1. Run "$SKILL_BASE_DIR/setup.sh" "$ARGUMENTS" and parse stdout for REPO, TOPIC_SLUG, ARTIFACT_DIR. $SKILL_BASE_DIR is the "Base directory for this skill" path shown at the top of this prompt.
   • If the script exits 2 (MISSING_SLUG on stderr), ask user via AskUserQuestion for the topic slug, then re-run with the slug.

Pre-flight Validation

1. Verify artifact directory exists → if not: "No artifact directory found. Run /dw-research-questions <slug> first in a separate conversation." Stop.
2. Verify 00-ticket.md exists in directory (confirms Phase 1 ran) → if not: "Phase 1 hasn't completed. Run /dw-research-questions <slug> first." Stop.
3. Do NOT read 00-ticket.md — only check existence via bash test -f.
4. Extract research questions — run the co-located extraction script:

   "$SKILL_BASE_DIR/extract-research-questions.sh" <repo> <topic-slug>
   

   This script outputs ONLY the ## Research Questions section from 01-research-questions.md. It never exposes the original prompt.
   • If it exits non-zero → display its stderr message and Stop.

Input

Use the output of extract-research-questions.sh from Pre-flight Step 4 as your input.

If the user pastes additional or edited questions, use those instead — user-provided questions always take precedence over the script output.

Process

Step 1: Parse questions

Extract numbered questions from pasted text. Identify the category of each.

Step 2: Map questions to agents

Category	Agent Type
Subsystem understanding	dw:codebase-analyzer
Code tracing	dw:codebase-analyzer
Pattern discovery	dw:codebase-pattern-finder
Dependency mapping	dw:codebase-locator
Boundary identification	dw:codebase-locator → dw:codebase-analyzer
Constraint discovery	dw:codebase-pattern-finder

Step 3: Dispatch agents

For each agent, prepend this objectivity wrapper to the task prompt:

"You are a documentarian. Answer the following question by reading the codebase. Report ONLY what exists. Do not suggest improvements, critique patterns, or propose solutions. Include file:line references for all claims."

Dispatch independent questions in parallel.

Step 4: Compile findings

For each question:

### Q<N>: <question text>
**Status:** COMPLETE | INCOMPLETE
**Sources:** <agent type(s) used>

<findings with file:line references>

Mark INCOMPLETE when: code can't be found, uses dynamic dispatch, or spans too many files. For INCOMPLETE, document what WAS found and what remains ambiguous.

Step 5: Cross-reference

Identify overlapping answers, contradictions, and cross-cutting patterns.

Step 6: Build structured summary

Synthesize findings into tagged categories. This summary is based ONLY on what the questions asked about — you have no task context, so do not filter by "relevance." Summarize everything you investigated.

System State (as investigated)

• Distill the current state of the systems/components that the questions covered. Include file:line references. Focus on factual descriptions of what exists.

Patterns Found

• Extract concrete code patterns discovered while answering questions. Format: <pattern name> — file:line — <brief description>
• Include: naming conventions, architectural patterns, integration patterns, test patterns — anything structural that was observed.

Constraints & Invariants

• Document any constraints, invariants, or rules enforced by the investigated code. Include: validation rules, type constraints, test assertions, config requirements.

Step 7: Write artifact

Write 02-research.md to the artifact directory:

---
phase: research
date: <today>
topic: <topic-slug>
repo: <repo>
git_sha: <HEAD>
agents_dispatched: <count>
questions_complete: <count>
questions_incomplete: <count>
input_artifacts: [01-research-questions.md (questions section only via extract script)]
status: complete
---

## Research Findings

### Q1: <question>
**Status:** COMPLETE
**Sources:** dw:codebase-analyzer

<detailed findings with file:line references>

...

## Summary
- <N>/<total> questions fully answered
- <M> questions incomplete (<list which and why>)

## Cross-References
- <overlaps, contradictions, patterns>

## Structured Summary

### System State (as investigated)
- <factual description of current system state for investigated components>
- <include file:line references>

### Patterns Found
- <pattern name> — `file:line` — <brief description>
- ...

### Constraints & Invariants
- <constraint> — <source/file:line>
- ...

Completion

1. Present findings summary, highlighting INCOMPLETE questions
2. Update .state.json:

   {
     "topic": "<topic-slug>",
     "repo": "<repo>",
     "current_phase": 2,
     "completed_phases": [1, 2],
     "last_updated": "<ISO timestamp>"
   }
   

3. Instruct: "Research is locked in. Run /dw-03-design-discussion <topic-slug> in a fresh conversation to continue. The original prompt will be re-introduced alongside these findings."