Menú
Use when a feature or fix is complete and verified, before merging, to get a focused review. Prepares a tight diff and the context a reviewer needs so the review finds real problems instead of drowning in noise.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Use when several pieces of work are genuinely independent and can run at once, to fan them out across parallel agents instead of doing them in sequence. Cuts wall-clock time and keeps each strand in its own clean context.
Use when a written plan exists and you are about to build it in the current session, to work it task by task with a checkpoint after each. Keeps execution honest against the plan instead of drifting into a freehand build.
Use when work needs its own isolated checkout — parallel strands that would fight over files, or a risky change you want quarantined from the main tree. Gives each strand a real working directory on its own branch without re-cloning.
Use whenever the user says "use slipstream", "use superpowers", or starts any task in a project that has slipstream. A hard, always-on discipline that forces scoped reads over whole-file reads to save tokens, recalls memory before acting, and records what is durable every turn so memory grows constantly.
Use when a site needs to look designed rather than defaulted, before building sections: establish a cohesive design system of type scale, spacing, colour, radius and shadow tokens so every component shares one premium visual language.
Use when building the top of a landing page, to produce a high-impact hero with confident display type, a clear single call to action and balanced composition, the kind of opening a polished marketing site leads with.
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when a feature or fix is complete and verified, before merging, to get a focused review. Prepares a tight diff and the context a reviewer needs so the review finds real problems instead of drowning in noise. |
| slipstream | {"category":"context","requires":[],"tags":["review","quality","collaboration"]} |
A review is only as good as what you hand the reviewer. A sprawling diff with no context gets a rubber stamp; a focused diff with a clear ask gets real scrutiny. This skill prepares the request so the review is worth the time: scope the change, state what to look at hardest, and make the diff readable.
/code-review, a pull request, or a fresh reviewer agent) with that context attached.Confirm the diff is scoped to one concern, the suite is green, and the request names the specific areas of doubt. A review request without a stated risk is not ready.