Audit outputs against the plan and acceptance criteria, producing a crisp QA report and actionable fixes. Aim for deterministic checks and concise recommendations.

Use this skill when

A downstream task claims to be finished and needs validation.
The user asks whether the work meets specific criteria.

Do not use this skill when

The work is still in-progress or lacks acceptance criteria.
The request is for creative ideation, not verification.

Instructions

Load the relevant artifact(s) and acceptance criteria from the plan or prompt.
Evaluate each criterion, marking pass/fail with evidence.
Summarize blocking issues and the minimal fixes required.
Emit a JSON-friendly summary plus a brief natural-language verdict.

Guardrails

Do not rewrite deliverables; limit to evaluation and precise fix notes.
Call out missing artifacts explicitly instead of guessing.
Keep verdicts bounded: pass, pass-with-notes, or fail.

💬 Example prompts that trigger this skill

Review artifacts/data.json against the acceptance criteria in artifacts/tasks.json

Validate the output at artifacts/data.json

Run sanity check on artifacts/data.json

Does the output in artifacts/data.json meet the requirements in artifacts/tasks.json?

The Validator will return a pass/fail verdict per criterion with specific fix notes. If something fails, go back to the Data agent with: Fix the issues noted in the QA report.

Más de este repositorio

mismo repositorio

data-agent

saurabhjambure-pixel/vibe-coder-antigravity-starter

Gather or generate factual inputs and structured data needed by downstream tasks.

2026-04-043

task-planner

saurabhjambure-pixel/vibe-coder-antigravity-starter

Plan a user goal into ordered, atomic subtasks with owners and expected artifacts.

2026-04-043

content-writer

saurabhjambure-pixel/vibe-coder-antigravity-starter

Write concise content for each planned task using provided inputs and produce the specified artifact.

2026-03-273

logic-sanity-check

saurabhjambure-pixel/vibe-coder-antigravity-starter

Audit outputs against acceptance criteria and logical consistency, producing a pass/fail QA report.

2026-03-273

task-planner

saurabhjambure-pixel/vibe-coder-antigravity-starter

Break a user goal into ordered, atomic tasks with owners and required artifacts.

2026-03-273

name	qa-reviewer
description	Validate completed tasks against acceptance criteria and flag defects with a pass/fail report.
version	0.1.0

Audit outputs against the plan and acceptance criteria, producing a crisp QA report and actionable fixes. Aim for deterministic checks and concise recommendations.

Use this skill when

A downstream task claims to be finished and needs validation.
The user asks whether the work meets specific criteria.

Do not use this skill when

The work is still in-progress or lacks acceptance criteria.
The request is for creative ideation, not verification.

Instructions

Load the relevant artifact(s) and acceptance criteria from the plan or prompt.
Evaluate each criterion, marking pass/fail with evidence.
Summarize blocking issues and the minimal fixes required.
Emit a JSON-friendly summary plus a brief natural-language verdict.

Guardrails

Do not rewrite deliverables; limit to evaluation and precise fix notes.
Call out missing artifacts explicitly instead of guessing.
Keep verdicts bounded: pass, pass-with-notes, or fail.

💬 Example prompts that trigger this skill

Review artifacts/data.json against the acceptance criteria in artifacts/tasks.json

Validate the output at artifacts/data.json

Run sanity check on artifacts/data.json

Does the output in artifacts/data.json meet the requirements in artifacts/tasks.json?

The Validator will return a pass/fail verdict per criterion with specific fix notes. If something fails, go back to the Data agent with: Fix the issues noted in the QA report.