| name | heal-skill |
| description | Fix incorrect SKILL.md files when a skill has wrong instructions or outdated API references |
Heal Skill
Runtime Tools
When this skill needs user questions, todo/progress tracking, subagents, or another skill, use the active runtime equivalents in RUNTIME_TOOLS.md.
Requirements
This skill needs file read/edit access and shell access for ls and git. Tool permissions are configured by the active agent runtime, not by this shared skill.
Update a skill's SKILL.md and related files based on corrections discovered during execution.
Analyze the conversation to detect which skill is running, reflect on what went wrong, propose specific fixes, get user approval, then apply changes with optional commit.
Step 1: Detect Skill
Identify the skill from conversation context:
- Look for skill invocation messages
- Check which SKILL.md was recently referenced
- Examine current task context
Set: SKILL_NAME=[skill-name] and SKILL_DIR=./skills/$SKILL_NAME
If unclear, ask the user.
Step 2: Reflect and Analyze
Focus on $ARGUMENTS if provided, otherwise analyze broader context.
Determine:
- What was wrong: Quote specific sections from SKILL.md that are incorrect
- Discovery method: Context7, error messages, trial and error, documentation lookup
- Root cause: Outdated API, incorrect parameters, wrong endpoint, missing context
- Scope of impact: Single section or multiple? Related files affected?
- Proposed fix: Which files, which sections, before/after for each
Step 3: Scan Affected Files
ls -la $SKILL_DIR/
ls -la $SKILL_DIR/references/ 2>/dev/null
ls -la $SKILL_DIR/scripts/ 2>/dev/null
Step 4: Present Proposed Changes
Present changes in this format:
**Skill being healed:** [skill-name]
**Issue discovered:** [1-2 sentence summary]
**Root cause:** [brief explanation]
**Files to be modified:**
- [ ] SKILL.md
- [ ] references/[file].md
- [ ] scripts/[file].py
**Proposed changes:**
### Change 1: SKILL.md - [Section name]
**Location:** Line [X] in SKILL.md
**Current (incorrect):**
[exact text from current file]
**Corrected:**
[new text]
**Reason:** [why this fixes the issue]
[repeat for each change across all files]
**Impact assessment:**
- Affects: [authentication/API endpoints/parameters/examples/etc.]
**Verification:**
These changes will prevent: [specific error that prompted this]
Step 5: Request Approval
Ask using structured user-question tool:
- Yes, apply and commit all changes
- Apply but don't commit (let me review first)
- Revise the changes (I'll provide feedback)
- Cancel (don't make changes)
Wait for user response. Do not proceed without approval.
Step 6: Apply Changes
Only after approval (option 1 or 2):
- Use Edit tool for each correction across all files
- Read back modified sections to verify
- If option 1, commit with structured message showing what was healed
- Confirm completion with file list
Success Criteria
- Skill correctly detected from conversation context
- All incorrect sections identified with before/after
- User approved changes before application
- All edits applied across SKILL.md and related files
- Changes verified by reading back
- Commit created if user chose option 1
Verification
Before completing:
- Read back each modified section to confirm changes applied
- Ensure cross-file consistency (SKILL.md examples match references/)
- Verify git commit created if option 1 was selected
- Check no unintended files were modified