Install, configure, verify, and refresh required harness runtime readiness facts for spec-first workflows on Claude Code, Codex, Kiro, Qoder, or Cursor.
公开 workflow：编写、改写、迁移或按 audit findings 修复 spec-first source skill（skills/<name>/）时使用。不要用于一次性回答、解释/总结/翻译、只审计、文档导出、第三方安装、普通 spec-* workflow 执行，或手改 generated runtime mirrors。
Use this standalone skill when the user asks to mine a repo's existing coding conventions for future AI coding, generate or refresh project rules with AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md pointers, create Cursor or Qoder rule files from actual code evidence, or make AI-generated code follow a specific project's habits. Do not use for team standards governance, normal code review/debug/refactor work, linter/formatter configuration, generic best practices, unsupported tool rule files such as .cursorrules or .kiro/steering rules, or generated runtime mirror edits.
Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying systems, or building apps where features are outcomes achieved by agents operating in a loop.
Capture a visual demo reel (GIF, terminal recording, screenshots) for PR descriptions. Use when shipping UI changes, CLI features, or any work with observable behavior that benefits from visual proof. Also use when asked to add a demo, record a GIF, screenshot a feature, show what changed visually, create a demo reel, capture evidence, add proof to a PR, or create a before/after comparison.
Create, share, view, comment on, edit, and run human-in-the-loop review loops over markdown documents via Proof, the collaborative markdown editor at proofeditor.ai ("Proof editor"). Use when the user wants to render or view a local markdown file in Proof, share markdown to get a URL, iterate collaboratively on a Proof doc, comment on or suggest edits in Proof, HITL a spec/plan/draft for human review, sync a Proof doc back to local, or work from a proofeditor.ai URL. Trigger on phrases like "view this in proof", "share to proof", "iterate with proof", or "HITL this doc", and on spec-brainstorm / spec-ideate / spec-plan handoffs for human review. Also match clear requests for a rendered/shared markdown review surface even if the user does not name Proof. Do not trigger on "proof" meaning evidence, math/logic proof, burden of proof, proof-of-concept, or bare "proofread this" requests where inline text review is expected.
Review code diffs, PRs, or branch implementation changes using tiered persona reviewers, confidence-gated findings, and merge/dedup synthesis. Do not use for requirements/plan/task-pack document review, implementation execution, planning unresolved work, or commit/push/PR creation.
Refresh existing learning or pattern docs under docs/solutions/ when they are stale, outdated, overlapping, drifted, inaccurate, or explicitly named for refresh/consolidation against the current codebase. Use for docs/solutions/ refresh/audit/sweep/cleanup/consolidation requests, specific stale solution docs, or a narrow stale-doc hint from spec-compound. Do not use for new learning capture, active debugging, general refactor/migration/code-review work, non-docs/solutions documentation sweeps, transcript archiving, mandatory completion gates, or generated runtime mirror edits.