| name | computational-reproducibility |
| description | Use when running, reviewing, or preparing computational experiments so inputs, outputs, manifests, failure states, and generated artifacts remain explicit and reproducible. |
Computational Reproducibility
Use this skill to keep computational experiments reproducible before expensive execution or change submission.
The goal is experimental discipline: fail early on invalid setup, keep source and generated artifacts separate, record enough identity to rerun work, and report scientific outcomes without ambiguous status labels.
Scientific stance
Treat each computation as a scientific claim, not merely working code. If reproducing the result faithfully would require equations laced with ad-hoc case splits, divide-by-zero guards, domain clipping, tuned regularization constants, or fallbacks, it has drifted from science toward engineering expedience: such devices belong in a scientific account only as part of the declared method — chosen deliberately, recorded, and visible — never inserted silently to make a degenerate case disappear. When in doubt, hard-fail and surface the degeneracy rather than patch past it.
When to use
Use this skill when:
- running or modifying computational experiments
- generating reports, figures, embeddings, metrics, CSV/JSON outputs, or model results
- preparing changes that depend on experiment outputs
- reviewing scientific-computing, numerical-analysis, TDA, simulation, or AI-for-science workflows
- long-running work could fail late because inputs, paths, dependencies, or compute access were not checked
When not to use
Do not use this skill for:
- ordinary prose edits
- purely static documentation that does not depend on generated results
- repository-specific CI, storage, gatekeeper, or runbook design
- creating manifest schemas, validators, or tooling unless the user explicitly asks
- prescribing concrete artifact directory names for a repository
Core principles
No implicit fallback
Missing inputs, layout mismatch, dependency absence, unavailable compute, or unavailable API access must hard-fail before execution.
Fallbacks are allowed only when all of these are true:
- the user or repository explicitly opts in
- the fallback is recorded in the manifest or run notes
- outputs clearly identify the fallback path
- review can distinguish fallback results from primary results
Do not silently substitute sample data, cached outputs, smaller models, different backends, local paths, or alternate datasets.
The same rule governs fallbacks inside a computation, not only at its inputs. Replacing a degenerate intermediate or estimator with a default hard-fails by default; take the fallback path only when the same four conditions hold (explicit opt-in + recorded + visible in outputs + distinguishable in review). Examples across domains:
- zero or near-zero weight sum substituted with uniform (or any) weights
- empty collection reduced to a default constant
- zero or near-zero denominator, norm, or scale substituted with a constant
- divide-by-zero dodged by adding a small constant to a denominator (e.g.
x / (denom + 1e-8)) instead of confronting the degeneracy
- an out-of-domain intermediate clipped into the valid range to suppress an error (e.g. clamping before
log/sqrt/arccos, or clipping probabilities into (0, 1))
- undefined primary estimator silently swapped for an alternate estimator or method
- NaN or missing value filled with 0 (or any constant)
This forbids silent divide-by-zero avoidance and domain clipping specifically: they may never be applied without the explicit opt-in above. Declared, recorded regularization or clipping that is the method (e.g. ridge regression, gradient clipping) is fine; the prohibition targets ad-hoc guards inserted to make a degenerate intermediate disappear.
Judge such a fallback by impact if triggered, not only by whether it fires on current data. A guard that never fires now can still be scientifically catastrophic if it would — for example a substituted scale that silently yields an order-of-magnitude-wrong result without signalling an error. A fallback that fires on a non-trivial fraction of inputs is itself a signal that the primary path's definition may be wrong; investigate the spec before accepting the fallback.
Separate source and artifacts
Keep source files and generated artifacts distinct.
Source material may belong in git:
- code
- documentation
- tests
- fixtures
- small static reference inputs intentionally used by tests
Generated artifacts stay outside git by default:
- experiment outputs
- logs
- reports
- figures
- embeddings
- metrics
- CSV/JSON result dumps
- model outputs
- temporary caches
Commit generated artifacts only when the repository explicitly treats them as source, fixtures, or reviewed deliverables.
Manifest before execution
Create or update the run manifest before expensive execution starts.
Record the applicable identity fields:
- repository commit SHA or source revision
- command or entry point
- configuration identity
- random seed, or an explicit statement that no stochastic process is used
- input identity, including dataset version, checksum, query, or source revision when available
- output identity, including run id and expected artifact location
- execution backend
- model or service when applicable
- dependency or environment identity
- compute venue when applicable
- fallback status
If a field does not apply, record that it is not applicable rather than omitting it when omission would create ambiguity.
Preflight gates expensive execution
Expensive execution starts only after required inputs, dependencies, identities, and compute access are validated.
Artifact layout stays invariant-level
Use stable source/output separation and stable run identity. Concrete directory names are repository policy.
Preflight checklist
Before launching long-running work, validate:
- required inputs exist and match the expected type
- input roots and output roots are distinct
- output location is writable and does not overwrite unrelated runs
- dependencies are installed and importable or executable
- required credentials, services, APIs, or compute venues are available when applicable
- the manifest contains enough identity to rerun or audit the run
- generated artifacts will not be written into source directories unless explicitly intended
If preflight fails, stop before execution. Do not repair by guessing paths, creating ad-hoc fallback inputs, or switching execution backends silently.
Artifact and manifest expectations
Manifest and artifact layout must make each run auditable without prescribing repository-specific paths.
The manifest must identify source revision, command, configuration, input identity, output identity, seed status, execution backend, applicable model/service identity, environment identity, and fallback status.
Deterministic artifact layout
Use stable source/output separation and a stable run identity. The exact directory names are repository policy; this skill only requires that:
- each run has an identifiable output location
- outputs from separate runs do not overwrite each other accidentally
- artifacts can be traced back to their manifest
- source inputs are not mixed with generated outputs
- reviewers can tell which files are source, fixtures, generated outputs, or temporary artifacts
Failure semantics
Use distinct status terms.
not-run: execution did not start.skipped: execution was intentionally bypassed for a recorded reason.failed: execution started and did not complete successfully.empty-result: execution completed, but produced no result where a result may normally exist.zero-result: execution completed and the measured value is legitimately zero.
Do not use empty, failed, or not-run interchangeably. If a status is uncertain, mark it as unknown and explain what evidence is missing.
Execution discipline
When running an experiment:
- Identify the source revision and intended inputs.
- Define the output identity before execution.
- Write or update the manifest.
- Run preflight checks.
- Execute only after preflight passes.
- Record the final status using the failure semantics above.
- Keep generated artifacts out of source control unless explicitly authorized.
When modifying an existing workflow, preserve stricter behaviour. Do not add silent fallback, implicit path discovery, runtime substitution for degenerate intermediates, or source/artifact conflation for convenience.
Review checklist
Before submitting changes involving computational experiments or generated outputs, check:
- Missing inputs and dependency absence hard-fail.
- Input and output roots are not conflated.
- Generated artifacts are outside git unless explicitly authorized.
- The manifest records source revision, inputs, outputs, seed status, execution backend, and applicable model/service identity.
- Preflight checks run before expensive execution.
- Artifact layout has stable source/output separation and run identity.
- Failure states distinguish
not-run, skipped, failed, empty-result, and zero-result.
- Any fallback is explicit, opted in, and visible in outputs or manifest.
- No silent, undeclared substitution, divide-by-zero guard, domain clipping, or regularization patching a degenerate intermediate or estimator (declared methods recorded per the rule above are fine). Preflight and manifest checks do not surface runtime numerical guards, so read the code, grepping for patterns such as: a literal
or followed by a constant, if x <= 0: x = ..., a small constant added to a denominator (+ 1e-8, + eps), clip/clamp into a valid domain, a default or initial value supplied to a reduce/fold/max/min, nan_to_num and equivalents, NaN-skipping reducers such as nanmean/nanmax/nansum (silent drop), and try/catch blocks returning a default.
- Each fallback is judged by impact if triggered, not only by whether it fires now; a high trigger rate is treated as a flag that the primary path may be misdefined.
- Host-specific paths, credentials, and local cache assumptions are not required for reproducibility.
Stop conditions
Stop and ask for a repository-specific decision when:
- the user wants generated artifacts committed but no repository policy authorizes it
- the workflow needs a concrete manifest schema or validator
- source and artifact roots cannot be separated without changing repository layout
- compute, API, credential, or dependency availability cannot be verified
- fallback behaviour is desired but not explicitly authorized
- failure semantics cannot be assigned from the available evidence
