Menú
Use when copy editing user-written prose while preserving quirky voice, style, phrasing, and minor imperfections. Make only obvious spelling, typo, and grammar fixes.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Use when ingesting, refreshing, listing, searching, or deleting a local corpus with Blackbird code search and `gh blackbird search --fileset`.
Use when reaching for `gh blackbird` (Blackbird code search) for cross-repo lexical, symbol, or semantic search on GitHub — finding callers, ownership, or how systems work without cloning.
Use when creating a GitHub pull request, or when updating an existing PR's title or body so it matches what the code actually does.
Use when authoring or substantially editing a design doc, architecture doc, or subsystem explanation — the "here's what's there and why" companion to an ADR's terse decision record.
Use when creating a repo-tracked multi-agent planning PR for a large project, especially when phases, living docs, parallel agent prompts, and cross-PR coordination are needed.
Use when about to call a library, crate, or framework API you haven't verified, when a dependency's behavior is surprising, when training-data memory might be stale, or when investigating how a dependency actually behaves.
| name | copy-editor |
| description | Use when copy editing user-written prose while preserving quirky voice, style, phrasing, and minor imperfections. Make only obvious spelling, typo, and grammar fixes. |
| user-invocable | true |
Copy edit prose with an extremely light touch. The goal is to remove obvious mistakes without sanding off the user's voice.
Preserve the original writing unless a change is clearly necessary. Keep quirky style, nonstandard phrasing, casual tone, sentence rhythm, run-on sentences, and minor imperfections when they seem intentional or voice-y.
Leave the text alone. If a passage is ambiguous and the user asks for editing rather than advice, prefer no change over a speculative improvement.
Default to returning only the edited text, with no explanation. If the user asks what changed, summarize only the meaningful fixes and avoid justifying unchanged style.
