con un clic
kb-review
Review a task against its acceptance criteria and current codebase state
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Menú
Review a task against its acceptance criteria and current codebase state
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Use GitKB code intelligence tools instead of grep for finding callers, definitions, usages, and dead code. Trigger when exploring code relationships or searching for symbol usage.
Explore codebase with code intelligence and search across code and documents. Use when searching by concept, finding where functionality lives, or investigating unfamiliar code.
Manage GitKB knowledge base for project documentation, tasks, and context. Use when working with KB documents, viewing tasks, updating progress, or managing project knowledge.
Show GitKB kanban board with task status columns
Complete a task with verification — check acceptance criteria, require evidence, update status
Commit workspace changes to the knowledge base with validation
| name | kb-review |
| description | Review a task against its acceptance criteria and current codebase state |
Review a task to assess completeness. Check acceptance criteria against the actual codebase, identify what's done, what's remaining, and what's changed since the task was written.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
The argument should be a task slug (e.g. tasks/my-task).
Use kb_show to load the full task document. Parse:
For each acceptance criterion, assess whether it's been satisfied:
If the criterion references specific code (a flag, a function, a file):
kb_symbols, Glob, or Grep to check if it exists in the codebaseRead to verify the implementation matches what's describedIf the criterion references tests:
If the criterion is behavioral (e.g. "result is identical to full reindex"):
If the criterion references documentation:
Compare the task's goals and implementation plan against what actually exists:
Use kb_graph to see:
Format as a structured assessment:
## Review: [task title]
### Acceptance Criteria: X of Y Done
| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence |
|---|-----------|--------|----------|
| 1 | [criterion text] | DONE | [file/function that satisfies it] |
| 2 | [criterion text] | NOT DONE | [what's missing] |
| 3 | [criterion text] | NEEDS VERIFICATION | [how to verify] |
### Summary
- [Overall assessment: ready to close, needs work, or needs verification]
- [Specific remaining items if any]
### Recommendation
- [Close it / Update it / Keep working on it]
Based on the review:
/kb-close <slug> to complete it."