name: explain-in
description: Rewrite engineer-to-engineer content for leadership audiences — VPs, directors, PMs, release managers. Shapes for the channel: JIRA comment, Slack post, standup note, email, or meeting talking-points. Use after post-mortem or any technical update that needs to flow up the org.
allowed-tools: Read
Explain In
Same audience and translation rules as a written status report, but shaped for the channel — JIRA comment, Slack post, async standup, email, or meeting talking-points. The channel decides the length, formatting, and how much structure to leave on the page.
Use this any time engineering content needs to flow up the org, sideways into product/release, or into a non-engineering meeting.
Activation Triggers
- "write something for management / exec / VP / director / PM / release manager"
- "rewrite this for [non-eng audience]" / "make this non-technical" / "less jargony"
- "send a slack update / standup note / email about [engineering work]"
- "executive summary" / "leadership update" / "status update"
- "talking points for [meeting]" based on an engineering update
/explain-in
Natural follow-on to post-mortem — post-mortem offers this handoff automatically after drafting. Do not re-offer unprompted if already offered.
If the channel is unclear, ask one question — "JIRA, Slack, standup, email, or meeting talking-points?" — and stop.
Audience
Engineering-savvy non-engineers: VPs, directors, PMs, release managers, execs in companies that ship technical products. They read product/framework names and cross-reference issue tracker IDs and PRs. They do not read code.
They want: what's the state, what does it mean for customers, who owns it, what's next. Not: how the bug works at the function level.
This is not for marketing, finance, customer-facing, or ELI5 audiences — flag and confirm before producing one of those.
Keep / Strip / Translate
Keep: Product names, framework names, team-owned component names, issue tracker IDs (JIRA key, GitHub issue, Linear ticket), PR numbers, customer/workload identifiers. These are the cross-reference bridge — losing them breaks tracking.
Strip: Function names, file paths, struct fields, commit SHAs, env var names, line numbers, internal data-structure jargon. None of this is actionable to the audience.
Translate: Mechanism into one or two sentences of plain-English cause-and-effect. Not "the kernel reads from scratchBuf == NULL" but "the GPUs end up reading from an uninitialized buffer and wait forever for a signal that never arrives." Translate without lying — a race stays a race; a regression stays a regression.
Don't over-strip. Engineering-org leadership reads concept-level technical vocabulary fluently — race condition, synchronization, uninitialized buffer, fast-path, workaround, queue, driver. The line is: concept exists and matters here (keep) vs. here's the function/struct/file/SHA (strip). Replacing "race" with "timing issue" patronizes the reader.
Bias toward active voice, concrete subjects, short paragraphs. "We found the bug. Alex wrote the fix. PR is up for review." beats passive constructions.
Avoid:
- Hedging that isn't really hedging ("we believe," "appears to") — state it or don't
- Re-stating the obvious for thoroughness
- Telling leadership how to do their job — give facts, they decide
- Engineering-process minutiae (bisect runs, GDB sessions) — they care you found it, not how
Channel Shapes
JIRA comment
Full structured block. Bolded section labels. Easy to scan from the ticket page.
Sections (use as many as fit, order by what matters most):
- Status / TL;DR — one bolded line. Reader can stop here. "Fixed pending merge." / "Root cause unknown — investigating."
- Impact — who's affected, how badly, what they see. Customer/workload/product terms, not test-suite terms.
- What broke — short paragraph, plain-English mechanism, one level of why, no code identifiers.
- Why now / how it slipped through — optional; include when leadership will ask anyway.
- Owner — person + team + their PR/branch/issue artifact. One link, not five.
- Next steps — concrete, near-term, ordered.
- Workaround / mitigation — if customers are hitting it now, one sentence on what they can do today.
- Risk — optional; real risks only, don't manufacture.
Slack post
Single message, no walls of text. Heavy bolded section labels read as "I escaped from JIRA" — don't.
- One bolded TL;DR as the first line.
- 2–4 short bullets: impact, owner + link, next step. Drop blocks that don't apply.
- One link, embedded inline (
JIRA-12345 / PR #5751). Not a link wall.
- No greeting, no signoff.
- Thread reply: lose the TL;DR — just lead with the answer.
Length target: under ~80 words for a top-level post; under ~40 for a thread reply.
Standup note
The audience scans 10 of these in 30 seconds. Front-load the verb.
- 1–3 lines, max.
- Pattern: "<state> <thing>. <owner if not me>. <next>."
- Examples:
- "Fixed Tada hang affecting dumbModel runs (JIRA-12345). PR #5751 in review. Backport to v7.2 next."
- "Still chasing the LLM-7B eval-step hang. Reproducer is reliable now; bisecting. No ETA yet."
- No bullets, no bolded labels. The format is the sentence.
Email
Subject line is half the value.
- Subject: TL;DR as a noun phrase. "Tada hang in dumbModel: fix in review (JIRA-12345)."
- Greeting: match recipient register (Hi Sam, / Hi all,).
- Body: JIRA-comment shape, but as flowing paragraphs separated by blank lines — no bolded section labels. Two or three paragraphs is plenty.
- Sign off with the next decision point that needs the recipient's attention, if any.
Meeting talking-points
You're going to say this, not show it.
- Bullet list, max one short clause per bullet.
- Order is the order you'll speak in.
- Include numbers/keys you want to reference out loud, in the bullet itself.
- Skip prose. "dumbModel LLM-7B fine-tuning was hanging." / "Root cause: skipped sync in Tada fast-path." / "Alex's fix in review, PR #5751."
Output Flow
- Confirm the channel if not stated.
- Produce the draft as a single chat block, formatted as the channel would render it.
- By default, print-only — the user copies it.
- Issue tracker back-post (JIRA, GitHub Issues, Linear): only if the user explicitly says so. Show the payload, wait for explicit "post it" / "go ahead", then post.
- Never auto-post to Slack, email, or any non-issue-tracker channel. Hand the draft to the user; they post it.
- One iteration is normal, three is a smell. On the third revision, ask what specific framing or audience assumption is off — don't keep tweaking blindly.
Rules
- Never invent facts. If the source says "root cause unknown," the rewrite says "root cause unknown."
- Never strip an issue tracker ID, PR number, or customer/workload name during de-jargoning.
- Never invent owners. If the source doesn't name one, ask the user.
- Get sign-off before posting to any issue tracker. Print-only output needs no approval.
- Never post to Slack, email, or any non-issue-tracker channel from this skill.
- Stay out of advocacy. This skill produces a status update, not a recommendation.
