metacog-bench

name	metacog-bench
description	Run a minimal metacognitive evaluation pass over the current task or repository change. Use to assess quality, calibration, and overhead.
user-invocable	true
disable-model-invocation	true
allowed-tools	Read, Grep, Glob, Bash

Minimal MetaCog Bench

Evaluate the current work on six axes:

Axis	Question	Score 1-5
Correctness evidence	Is the result backed by tests, checks, or verifiable facts?
Calibration quality	Does the stated confidence match the actual evidence strength?
Tool efficiency	Were tools used only when necessary? Any redundant calls?
Context overhead	How much context was consumed vs. the value delivered?
Workflow friction	Were there unnecessary round-trips, retries, or dead ends?
Residual risk	What is the likelihood of an undetected issue?

Return exactly

Scores: correctness=X, calibration=X, tools=X, context=X, friction=X, risk=X
Strongest gain: [what Aletheia workflows helped most]
Strongest cost: [what added overhead without proportional value]
Improvement: [one concrete instrumentation or workflow change]

Rules:

• Be honest. A 5/5 on correctness with no tests run is wrong.
• "Strongest cost" must be actionable (not "it took time").
• The improvement must be specific enough to implement in the next session.