| name | infrahub-analyst |
| description | Analyze and correlate Infrahub data using the MCP server. Use when querying live infrastructure data to answer operational questions, detect drift, correlate node types, investigate service impact, check maintenance windows, or produce ad-hoc reports — without writing pipeline code. |
| metadata | {"version":"1.1.0","author":"OpsMill"} |
Overview
Expert guidance for interactive data analysis
against a live Infrahub instance. This skill uses
the Infrahub MCP server to query, correlate,
and reason over infrastructure data on demand —
answering operational questions that span multiple
node types and relationships.
Use this skill for any question of the form
"what does Infrahub currently know about X,
and how does it relate to Y?"
Typical question patterns:
- Compliance — "Are all devices following
the naming convention?"
- Service impact — "Which services are hosted
on devices in this rack?"
- Maintenance windows — "Which devices are
currently in a maintenance window, and what
depends on them?"
- Drift detection — "Which realized devices
differ from their topology design?"
- Capacity — "Which racks are over 80% full?"
- Change impact — "What BGP sessions, services,
and IPs depend on this prefix?"
- Inventory gaps — "Which devices have no
platform or OS version recorded?"
For automated, pipeline-enforced checks that
block proposed changes, see
../infrahub-check-creator/SKILL.md.
For repeatable scheduled reports exported as
artifacts, see ../infrahub-transform-creator/SKILL.md.
When to Use
- Answering operational questions interactively
via natural language
- Cross-referencing two or more node types to find
relationships or gaps
- Investigating the blast radius of a change before
executing it
- Auditing data quality across the inventory
- Producing one-time or on-demand reports for
stakeholders
- Exploring schema structure and data before writing
a generator or check
How It Works
The Infrahub MCP server exposes tools that let
Claude query Infrahub data directly.
The typical workflow:
- Query — use MCP tools to fetch current state
from Infrahub
- Correlate — join, diff, or filter the data
against a policy or second dataset
- Reason — identify gaps, anomalies, or
relationships
- Report — surface findings with context and
remediation hints
Rule Categories
| Priority | Category | Prefix | Description |
|---|
| CRITICAL | MCP Tools | mcp- | Available Infrahub MCP tools, invocation patterns, response structure |
| CRITICAL | Query Patterns | query- | GraphQL structures for fetching, filtering, and traversing relationships |
| HIGH | Correlation | correlation- | Joining, diffing, and reasoning over data from multiple queries |
| HIGH | Reporting Output | reporting- | Presenting findings: summaries, tables, per-object detail, remediation hints |
| MEDIUM | Approach Selection | approach- | When to use MCP analysis vs InfrahubCheck vs Transform |
MCP Server Basics
When the Infrahub MCP server is connected, Claude
can call tools such as:
mcp__infrahub__infrahub_query — Execute a
GraphQL query (primary tool)
mcp__infrahub__infrahub_list_schema — List
available node kinds
mcp__infrahub__infrahub_get — Retrieve a
specific object by ID or filters
mcp__infrahub__infrahub_create — Create an
object (remediation, on a branch)
mcp__infrahub__infrahub_update — Update an
object (remediation, on a branch)
query MaintenanceDevices {
MaintenanceWindow(status__value: "active") {
edges {
node {
name { value }
start_time { value }
end_time { value }
devices {
edges {
node {
name { value }
role { value }
site {
node { name { value } }
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Typical Analysis Workflow
1. Understand the question
→ "Which services depend on devices currently
in a maintenance window?"
2. Identify the node types involved
→ MaintenanceWindow, DcimDevice, Service
(or equivalent in your schema)
3. Query current state
→ mcp__infrahub__infrahub_query — one query
per node type, or combined
4. Correlate the data
→ Join across node types, filter, count, diff
5. Report findings
→ Summarize with counts, list affected objects,
suggest next steps
Supporting References