con un clic
vmcp-review
// Reviews vMCP code changes for known anti-patterns that make the codebase harder to understand or more brittle. Use when reviewing PRs, planning features, or refactoring vMCP code.
// Reviews vMCP code changes for known anti-patterns that make the codebase harder to understand or more brittle. Use when reviewing PRs, planning features, or refactoring vMCP code.
Guide for using ToolHive CLI (thv) to run and manage MCP servers and skills. Use when running, listing, stopping, building, or configuring MCP servers locally. Covers server lifecycle, registry browsing, secrets management, client registration, groups, container builds, exports, permissions, network isolation, authentication, and skill management (install, uninstall, list, info, build, push, validate). NOT for Kubernetes operator usage or ToolHive development/contributing.
Validates operator chart contribution practices (helm template, ct lint, docs generation) before committing changes.
Creates ToolHive release PRs by analyzing commits since the last release, categorizing changes, recommending semantic version bump type (major/minor/patch), and triggering the release workflow. Use when cutting a release, preparing a new version, checking what changed since last release, or when the user mentions "release", "version bump", or "cut a release".
Implements a GitHub user story from planning through PR creation, with research, codebase analysis, and structured commits.
Generates polished GitHub release notes for a ToolHive release by analyzing every merged PR, cross-referencing linked issues, dispatching expert agents to assess breaking changes, and producing a formatted release body. Use when the user provides a GitHub release URL, tag name, or says "release notes".
Finds flaky tests on the main branch by analyzing GitHub Actions failures, ranks them by frequency, and enters parallel plan mode to design deflake strategies. Use when you want to find and fix the flakiest tests.
| name | vmcp-review |
| description | Reviews vMCP code changes for known anti-patterns that make the codebase harder to understand or more brittle. Use when reviewing PRs, planning features, or refactoring vMCP code. |
Review code in pkg/vmcp/ and cmd/vmcp/ for known anti-patterns that increase cognitive load, create brittle dependencies, or undermine testability. This skill is used both for reviewing proposed changes and for auditing existing code.
Identify the files to review:
pkg/vmcp/ and cmd/vmcp/.go files in the target packageFor each file under review, check against the anti-patterns defined in .claude/rules/vmcp-anti-patterns.md (which is auto-loaded when vMCP files are read). Not every anti-pattern applies to every file — use judgment about which checks are relevant based on what the code does.
For each finding, classify severity:
Structure your report as:
## vMCP Review: [scope description]
### Must Fix
- **[Anti-pattern name]** in `path/to/file.go:line`: [What's wrong and what to do instead]
### Should Fix
- **[Anti-pattern name]** in `path/to/file.go:line`: [What's wrong and what to do instead]
### Notes
- **[Anti-pattern name]** in `path/to/file.go:line`: [Brief description, for awareness]
### Clean
No issues found for: [list anti-patterns that were checked and passed]
If no issues are found, say so explicitly — a clean review is valuable signal.
golangci-lint for that)