soleri-agent-issues

name	soleri-agent-issues
tier	default
description	Triggers: "create issue", "file bug", "gh issue", "create task", "report bug", "create tickets". Creates structured GitHub issues optimized for agent execution.

Agent-Optimized Issue Creation

Create GitHub issues that AI agents can parse, execute, and verify without ambiguity. Every issue is a self-contained work order — an agent reading it has everything needed to start, execute, and prove completion.

Core Principle

Human issues describe problems. Agent issues describe solutions as testable outcomes.

An agent cannot act on "improve avatar handling." It can act on: "Add PNG upload to POST /v1/avatar in apps/api/src/routes/avatar.ts, return { avatarUrl }, reject files > 2MB with 413."

When to Use

• Creating any GitHub issue via gh issue create
• Filing bugs from conversation context or error logs
• Breaking plans into trackable work items
• Creating milestones with sub-issues
• Converting vault patterns or anti-patterns into actionable fixes

Vault Context Check

Before creating the issue, search for related patterns:

YOUR_AGENT_core op:search_intelligent
  params: { query: "<bug description or feature summary>" }

YOUR_AGENT_core op:memory_search
  params: { query: "<similar issues>" }

Issue Template by Type

Bug

# Objective

<one sentence: what's broken and what "fixed" looks like>

## Type: bug

## Component: <package or module name>

## Priority: P0 | P1 | P2 | P3

## Context

- Impact: <who/what is affected>
- Related: <links to issues, PRs, vault entries>
- First seen: <date or commit>

## Steps to Reproduce

1. <exact command or action>
2. <exact command or action>
3. Observe: <what happens>

## Expected vs Actual

|              | Behavior           |
| ------------ | ------------------ |
| **Expected** | <correct behavior> |
| **Actual**   | <broken behavior>  |

## Error Output

<paste exact error, stack trace, or log output>

## Root Cause (if known)
- File: `path/to/file.ts` — `functionName()` or line reference
- Why: <brief technical explanation>

## Scope
| In | Out |
|----|-----|
| Fix the specific bug | Refactoring surrounding code |
| Add regression test | Performance optimization |

## Code Locations
- Bug site: `path/to/file.ts` — `symbolName`
- Test file: `path/to/file.test.ts`
- Related: `path/to/related.ts` — `relatedSymbol`

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Bug no longer reproduces with steps above
- [ ] Regression test added that fails without fix, passes with fix
- [ ] No new lint/type errors
- [ ] Existing tests pass

## Verification
```bash
<exact test command>
<exact build/lint command>

### Feature

```markdown
# Objective
<one sentence: what capability is added and why>

## Type: feature
## Component: <package or module name>
## Priority: P0 | P1 | P2 | P3

## Context
- Why: <user need or business reason>
- Related: <links to issues, PRs, vault entries, specs>

## Scope
| In | Out |
|----|-----|
| <specific deliverable> | <what NOT to touch> |

## Constraints
- Backward compatibility: <requirements>
- Dependencies: <allowed/forbidden>
- Performance: <budgets if any>
- Security: <requirements if any>

## Code Locations
- Entry point: `path/to/file.ts` — `functionOrClass`
- Integration point: `path/to/other.ts` — `symbol`
- Test location: `path/to/test.ts`

## Proposed Approach (optional)
1. <step>
2. <step>

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Given <precondition>, when <action>, then <result>
- [ ] Given <precondition>, when <action>, then <result>
- [ ] Tests added for new behavior
- [ ] Types exported if public API

## Verification
```bash
<exact test command>
<exact build command>

Definition of Done

• Acceptance criteria satisfied
• npm test passes
• npm run typecheck passes
• Changes scoped to "In Scope" only

### Milestone

```markdown
# Milestone: <short title>

## Objective
<one sentence: what this milestone achieves>

## Timeline
- Target: <date>
- Depends on: <blocking milestones or external factors>

## Sub-Issues

| # | Type | Title | Priority | Depends On |
|---|------|-------|----------|------------|
| 1 | feature | <title> | P1 | — |
| 2 | feature | <title> | P1 | #1 |
| 3 | bug | <title> | P2 | — |

## Completion Criteria
- [ ] All sub-issues closed
- [ ] Integration test passes end-to-end
- [ ] <milestone-level verification>

Record Issue

After creating the issue, capture it for future reference:

YOUR_AGENT_core op:capture_quick
  params: { title: "GH Issue #<number>: <title>", tags: ["github", "issue"] }

Field Guide

Writing Good Objectives

Bad	Good
"Fix the login"	"Login returns 401 instead of session token when OAuth callback has valid code"
"Add dark mode"	"Add prefers-color-scheme media query support to all semantic color tokens"
"Improve performance"	"Reduce cold-start vault search from 800ms to <200ms by lazy-loading FTS index"

Writing Good Acceptance Criteria

Use Given/When/Then for behavioral criteria. Use plain checkboxes for structural criteria.

Behavioral:

• Given a user with valid OAuth code, when POST /auth/callback, then returns 200 with session token

Structural:

• Unit test covers happy path + error case
• No new any types introduced
• Public API documented in JSDoc

Writing Good Code Locations

Always include:

1. File path — repo-root relative
2. Anchor — function name, class name, route, or config key
3. Context — what the agent should look at there

- Handler: `packages/core/src/auth/callback.ts` — `handleOAuthCallback()`
- Token logic: `packages/core/src/auth/session.ts` — `createSession()`
- Test: `packages/core/src/__tests__/auth.test.ts` — "OAuth callback" describe block

Constraints That Prevent Agent Overreach

Be explicit about boundaries. Agents optimize globally unless told not to.

## Constraints
- Do NOT modify the public API surface of `@soleri/core`
- Do NOT add new npm dependencies
- Do NOT refactor surrounding code — fix only the bug
- Backward compatible: existing agent.yaml files must still work

Workflow

1. Gather context — search vault, read error logs, check git blame
2. Identify code locations — grep codebase for relevant symbols
3. Choose template — bug, feature, or milestone
4. Fill template — every field. Skip none.
5. Create issue — gh issue create --title "..." --body "..." --label "..."

Integration with Planning

When creating issues from a plan, the plan is the source of truth — GitHub issues are the projection. Each task becomes a lean issue pointing back to the plan.

Plan-Sourced Task Template

# Objective

<one sentence: what this task delivers>

## Plan: `<plan-id>` | Task <N> of <total>

## Parent: #<epic-issue-number>

## Complexity: Low | Medium | High

## Depends on: <task dependencies or "nothing">

## Code Locations

- `path/to/file.ts` — `symbolOrFunction`

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] <testable outcome>
- [ ] <testable outcome>
- [ ] Tests pass

## Verification

```bash
<exact command>
```

### Rules for Plan-Sourced Issues

1. **Plan ID is mandatory** — every task issue must include `## Plan: \`<plan-id>\`` so the full plan is one API call away
2. **Keep issues lean** — task description + code locations + acceptance criteria
3. **One issue per task** — don't bundle multiple plan tasks into one issue
4. **Parent/epic issue** — create a parent issue that lists all task issues
5. **Map complexity to priority** — High → P1, Medium → P2, Low → P3
6. **Include task number** — "Task 3 of 11" helps track progress

## Labels

Always apply at least:
- Type: `bug`, `feature`, `refactor`, `chore`
- Priority: `P0`, `P1`, `P2`, `P3` (if using priority labels)
- Component: package or module name (if using component labels)

Agent Tools Reference

Op	When to Use
search_intelligent	Check vault before creating issues
memory_search	Find similar past issues
capture_quick	Record created issue for future reference