Menu
서브에이전트 컨텍스트 문제를 해결하기 위한 점진적 컨텍스트 검색 개선 패턴
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Use after a complex task, failure, or when reviewing what was learned. Teaches how to write growth logs that extract reusable patterns — not diary entries.
Design a goal-oriented agent loop, and review it for the ways loops go wrong — spinning and burning tokens, Goodhart-gaming the verifier, or running a wrong answer to completion. Two actions: (1) WRITE a loop — gate whether to build it, define a machine-decidable goal, pick the loop type, pick a skeleton; (2) REVIEW a loop — run it past five failure modes plus decidability, boundaries, fallback, judge independence, and keep-judgment-with-the-human red lines. Use when designing an autonomous agent loop, or when you already have one and worry it will spin, cheat, or run a wrong answer to the end. Complements the mechanism-layer loop skills (autonomous-loops, continuous-agent-loop) by covering the judgment layer they don't. 中文触发：写 loop、设计 loop、做一个 loop、检查 loop 对不对、loop 体检、loop 会不会跑飞、可判定目标、五个崩法、plan build judge。English triggers: design an agent loop, write a loop, check a loop, loop review, prevent a runaway loop, goal-oriented loop, decidable goal, plan/build/judge.
Stop hook that blocks Claude from finishing until quality checks pass. Detects rationalization patterns (surface text heuristics), stale learning logs (filesystem mtime), and low disk space. Complements self-audit by mechanically enforcing learning capture habits.
React Native and Expo app patterns — Expo Router navigation, state separation (server/client/route/form), TanStack Query data fetching with Zod, performant lists, NativeWind/StyleSheet styling, native APIs, and secure storage. Use when building or editing React Native / Expo screens, components, navigation, or data layers.
Instinct-based learning system that observes sessions via hooks, creates atomic instincts with confidence scoring, and evolves them into skills/commands/agents. v2.1 adds project-scoped instincts to prevent cross-project contamination.
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
| name | iterative-retrieval |
| description | 서브에이전트 컨텍스트 문제를 해결하기 위한 점진적 컨텍스트 검색 개선 패턴 |
| origin | ECC |
서브에이전트가 작업을 시작하기 전까지 필요한 컨텍스트를 알 수 없는 멀티 에이전트 워크플로우의 "컨텍스트 문제"를 해결합니다.
서브에이전트는 제한된 컨텍스트로 생성됩니다. 다음을 알 수 없습니다:
표준 접근법의 실패:
컨텍스트를 점진적으로 개선하는 4단계 루프:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ DISPATCH │─────│ EVALUATE │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ LOOP │─────│ REFINE │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │
│ Max 3 cycles, then proceed │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
후보 파일을 수집하기 위한 초기 광범위 쿼리:
// Start with high-level intent
const initialQuery = {
patterns: ['src/**/*.ts', 'lib/**/*.ts'],
keywords: ['authentication', 'user', 'session'],
excludes: ['*.test.ts', '*.spec.ts']
};
// Dispatch to retrieval agent
const candidates = await retrieveFiles(initialQuery);
검색된 콘텐츠의 관련성 평가:
function evaluateRelevance(files, task) {
return files.map(file => ({
path: file.path,
relevance: scoreRelevance(file.content, task),
reason: explainRelevance(file.content, task),
missingContext: identifyGaps(file.content, task)
}));
}
점수 기준:
평가를 기반으로 검색 기준 업데이트:
function refineQuery(evaluation, previousQuery) {
return {
// Add new patterns discovered in high-relevance files
patterns: [...previousQuery.patterns, ...extractPatterns(evaluation)],
// Add terminology found in codebase
keywords: [...previousQuery.keywords, ...extractKeywords(evaluation)],
// Exclude confirmed irrelevant paths
excludes: [...previousQuery.excludes, ...evaluation
.filter(e => e.relevance < 0.2)
.map(e => e.path)
],
// Target specific gaps
focusAreas: evaluation
.flatMap(e => e.missingContext)
.filter(unique)
};
}
개선된 기준으로 반복 (최대 3회):
async function iterativeRetrieve(task, maxCycles = 3) {
let query = createInitialQuery(task);
let bestContext = [];
for (let cycle = 0; cycle < maxCycles; cycle++) {
const candidates = await retrieveFiles(query);
const evaluation = evaluateRelevance(candidates, task);
// Check if we have sufficient context
const highRelevance = evaluation.filter(e => e.relevance >= 0.7);
if (highRelevance.length >= 3 && !hasCriticalGaps(evaluation)) {
return highRelevance;
}
// Refine and continue
query = refineQuery(evaluation, query);
bestContext = mergeContext(bestContext, highRelevance);
}
return bestContext;
}
Task: "Fix the authentication token expiry bug"
Cycle 1:
DISPATCH: Search for "token", "auth", "expiry" in src/**
EVALUATE: Found auth.ts (0.9), tokens.ts (0.8), user.ts (0.3)
REFINE: Add "refresh", "jwt" keywords; exclude user.ts
Cycle 2:
DISPATCH: Search refined terms
EVALUATE: Found session-manager.ts (0.95), jwt-utils.ts (0.85)
REFINE: Sufficient context (2 high-relevance files)
Result: auth.ts, tokens.ts, session-manager.ts, jwt-utils.ts
Task: "Add rate limiting to API endpoints"
Cycle 1:
DISPATCH: Search "rate", "limit", "api" in routes/**
EVALUATE: No matches - codebase uses "throttle" terminology
REFINE: Add "throttle", "middleware" keywords
Cycle 2:
DISPATCH: Search refined terms
EVALUATE: Found throttle.ts (0.9), middleware/index.ts (0.7)
REFINE: Need router patterns
Cycle 3:
DISPATCH: Search "router", "express" patterns
EVALUATE: Found router-setup.ts (0.8)
REFINE: Sufficient context
Result: throttle.ts, middleware/index.ts, router-setup.ts
에이전트 프롬프트에서 사용:
When retrieving context for this task:
1. Start with broad keyword search
2. Evaluate each file's relevance (0-1 scale)
3. Identify what context is still missing
4. Refine search criteria and repeat (max 3 cycles)
5. Return files with relevance >= 0.7
continuous-learning 스킬 - 시간이 지남에 따라 개선되는 패턴~/.claude/agents/의 에이전트 정의