| name | compare |
| description | Compare sentiment and blogger opinions between two stocks. Use when users want to analyze NVDA vs AMD, or any two tickers side by side. |
Stock Comparison
Compare sentiment and blogger opinions between two stocks.
Triggers
- "对比 NVDA 和 AMD"
- "比较这两只股票"
- "compare NVDA vs AMD"
- "NVDA 和 AMD 哪个好"
/compare NVDA AMD
/compare {ticker1} {ticker2}
Arguments
ticker1 - First stock ticker (required)
ticker2 - Second stock ticker (required)
Instructions
When the user wants to compare two stocks, follow these steps:
-
Get Sentiment for Both Stocks
Call get_ticker_sentiment for both tickers in parallel to get sentiment data.
-
Search for Related Viewpoints
Call search_viewpoints with each ticker to find detailed blogger opinions.
-
Analyze and Compare
Create a side-by-side comparison covering:
- Overall sentiment score
- Number of bullish vs bearish bloggers
- Key arguments for each side
- Common themes in viewpoints
-
Present Results
Format the output as:
## 股票对比: TICKER1 vs TICKER2
| 指标 | TICKER1 | TICKER2 |
|------|---------|---------|
| 整体情绪 | 🟢 看涨 | 🟡 中性 |
| 看涨博主 | X 位 | Y 位 |
| 看跌博主 | X 位 | Y 位 |
| 提及次数 | XX | YY |
### TICKER1 关键观点
**看涨理由:**
- [观点1] — 博主A
- [观点2] — 博主B
**风险提示:**
- [风险1] — 博主C
### TICKER2 关键观点
**看涨理由:**
- [观点1] — 博主D
**风险提示:**
- [风险1] — 博主E
### 综合分析
[基于数据的客观分析,指出两者的优劣势]
Tool Sequence
get_ticker_sentiment(ticker1) + get_ticker_sentiment(ticker2) → In parallel
search_viewpoints(ticker1) + search_viewpoints(ticker2) → In parallel
- Compile comparison table and analysis
Notes
- Always present data objectively, let users make their own decisions
- Highlight where bloggers disagree
- If one ticker has significantly more coverage, note this caveat
- Do NOT give buy/sell recommendations