| name | verifying-outcomes |
| description | Goal-backward verification — checks whether the desired outcome was achieved, not whether tasks were marked done. Use when the user asks to "verify", "did this actually work", "is X really done" — or before you claim a task is complete and before closing an issue / merging a PR. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| compatibility | Works in any repo. Uses Read, Grep, Glob, Bash. |
| metadata | {"authors":["Artem Rozumenko <artem_rozumenko@epam.com>"],"version":"0.1.0"} |
Verifying Outcomes
"Tasks completed" ≠ "goal achieved." Your job is to verify the outcome, ruthlessly and from evidence.
If the goal is fuzzy, ask for clarification before starting. Don't verify a moving target.
Five Checks
1. STATE the goal
Restate it as a concrete, testable outcome — not as a list of tasks. Write it at the top of the report verbatim.
2. What must be TRUE
List the logical conditions that must hold for the goal to be met. These are assertions about behavior, not about work performed.
- ✅ "API returns 200 for valid requests and 401 for missing tokens"
- ❌ "Endpoint was implemented"
3. What must EXIST
List concrete artifacts: files, endpoints, configs, migrations, tests, docs. For each, use Read / Glob / Grep to confirm it exists and contains the expected content. Existence alone isn't enough — empty stubs fail.
4. What must be CONNECTED
Things that exist but aren't wired up are useless. Verify:
- Imports / exports
- Route registrations, DI bindings, plugin lists
- Config keys actually read by the code
- Tests actually run by the test command (not orphaned files)
- Migrations actually included in the migration manifest
Use Grep to trace from the artifact to its consumer. If you can't find the consumer, it isn't connected.
5. Where will this BREAK
- Edge cases and error paths
- Missing input validation
- Hardcoded values that should be config / env vars
- Missing or unhandled env vars (
Grep for os.getenv / process.env without defaults)
- Race conditions, timeouts, retries
- Test coverage gaps for the new behavior
Output
## Verification: <goal verbatim>
### Verdict: PASS | PARTIAL | FAIL
### TRUE
- <verified condition> — <how you verified>
- ...
### EXISTS
- <artifact> — <path:line> — <what you confirmed>
- ...
### CONNECTED
- <integration point> — <evidence>
- ...
### RISKS
- <where this will break, and why>
- ...
### Summary
<1–2 sentences>
Rules
- Cite file paths and line numbers for every claim. No hand-waving.
- A check you can't perform is a FAIL for that check, not a pass-by-default.
- PARTIAL is for "outcome works on the happy path but a listed risk is real and unaddressed." Don't use it as a polite FAIL.
- Be honest. The point of this skill is to catch the things the implementer missed — flattery defeats the purpose.
