security-validation

name	Security Validation
description	Pre-merge security validation detecting secrets, user-specific paths, insecure SSH configurations, and security-weakening flags
category	validation
usage	action, qa, frontend, seo, backend, devops
version	1
created	"2025-11-05T00:00:00.000Z"
converted_from	docs/agents/shared-ref-docs/security-validation-checklist.md

Security Validation

When to Use

Use this skill when you need to:

• Pre-commit validation (Action Agent): Scan documentation/configuration files before committing
• Pre-merge validation (QA Agent): Full security scan before approving PR for merge
• Work block planning (Planning Agent): Include security acceptance criteria in job specifications
• Code review (Any Agent): Verify no hardcoded secrets, user-specific paths, or insecure configurations

Triggers:

• Before committing ANY documentation or configuration files
• Before approving any PR for merge
• During code review when security-sensitive changes detected
• When creating work blocks that involve documentation, configuration, or scripts

Workflow

Step 1: Determine Scan Scope

For Action Agent (pre-commit):

• Scan only files in docs/ directory
• Focus on documentation and configuration files being committed
• Run before git add to catch issues early

For QA Agent (pre-merge):

• Scan both docs/ AND src/ directories
• Full repository scan for comprehensive security validation
• Run after all code changes complete, before PR approval

For Planning Agent (work block creation):

• Include security acceptance criteria in job specifications
• No scan required - embedding requirements for downstream agents

Step 2: Run Security Scans

Execute the following security checks based on your agent role:

Check 1: Secret Detection

Purpose: Detect hardcoded secrets in documentation and code

# For Action Agent (docs only):
grep -r -E "(secret|password|token|key|apiKey)[\s]*=[\s]*['\"]?[a-zA-Z0-9_./+-]{20,}" docs/

# For QA Agent (docs + code):
grep -r -E "(secret|password|token|key|apiKey)[\s]*=[\s]*['\"]?[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{20,}" docs/
grep -r -E "(secret|password|token|key|apiKey)[\s]*=[\s]*['\"]?[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{20,}" src/

Pass Criteria: All matches are placeholders (<SECRET>, $ENV_VAR, ***REDACTED***)

Fail Criteria: Any match appears to be an actual secret (not a placeholder)

Check 2: Path Portability

Purpose: Detect user-specific absolute paths that break portability

# For Action Agent (docs only):
grep -r -E "(\/Users\/|\/home\/|C:\\\\Users\\\\|~\/Desktop)" docs/

# For QA Agent (docs + code):
grep -r -E "(\/Users\/|\/home\/|C:\\\\Users\\\\|~\/Desktop)" docs/
grep -r -E "(\/Users\/|\/home\/|C:\\\\Users\\\\)" src/

Pass Criteria: No user-specific paths found

Fail Criteria: Any user-specific path found (must use repo-relative paths)

Check 3: SSH Security

Purpose: Detect insecure SSH configurations that disable host key verification

# Scan for insecure SSH configs:
grep -r -E "(StrictHostKeyChecking no|UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null)" docs/

Pass Criteria: No insecure SSH patterns found, OR security warning is documented

Fail Criteria: Insecure SSH config found without security justification

Check 4: Security-Weakening Flags

Purpose: Detect dangerous flags that bypass security controls

# Scan for dangerous flags:
grep -r -E "(--dangerously-skip-permissions|--no-verify|--insecure|-k|--allow-root|chmod 777)" docs/

Pass Criteria: All security-weakening flags have ⚠️ **Security Warning:** block above them

Fail Criteria: Security-weakening flags found without warning block

Check 5: Documentation-Code Consistency (Manual Check)

Purpose: Ensure documented paths/scripts match actual implementation

• If docs reference validation scripts, read those scripts
• Verify documented paths match script expectations
• Check artifact directories have .gitignore rules (if needed)

Step 3: Interpret Results

Use this decision matrix to determine next actions:

Finding	Severity	Action
Hardcoded secrets found	CRITICAL	❌ FAIL - Stop immediately, request guidance
User-specific paths in docs	HIGH	❌ FAIL - Must fix before commit/merge
User-specific paths in code	MEDIUM	⚠️ WARN - Request fix
Insecure SSH config	HIGH	⚠️ WARN - Check for security justification
Security flags without warning	MEDIUM	⚠️ WARN - Request warning block
Path mismatch (docs vs. scripts)	MEDIUM	⚠️ WARN - Request alignment

Enforcement Rules:

For Action Agent:

• MUST STOP if ANY check fails
• Request guidance from Planning Agent before proceeding
• Do not commit until issues resolved

For QA Agent:

• MUST FAIL review if hardcoded secrets or user-specific paths in docs found
• SHOULD WARN for other issues
• Do not approve PR until critical issues fixed

Step 4: Report Findings

If security issues found, generate a report using this template:

**Security Scan Results**

❌ **FAILED** - Security issues found:

### Critical Issues

1. **Secret Exposure** (<file>:<line>):
   - Found: `<actual pattern>`
   - Fix: Replace with `<placeholder pattern>` or `$ENV_VAR`

2. **Path Portability** (<file>:<line>):
   - Found: `/Users/username/Desktop/project/path`
   - Fix: Use `path/from/repo/root` (repo-relative)

### Warnings

3. **SSH Security** (<file>:<line>):
   - Found: `StrictHostKeyChecking no`
   - Fix: Use `StrictHostKeyChecking yes` or add security justification

4. **Security Flag Without Warning** (<file>:<line>):
   - Found: `--dangerously-skip-permissions`
   - Fix: Add `⚠️ **Security Warning:**` block above usage

**Recommendation**: [BLOCKED | REQUEST FIXES | APPROVED WITH WARNINGS]

If all checks pass, proceed with commit/PR approval:

**Security Scan Results**

✅ **PASSED** - No security issues found

All checks passed:
- [x] No hardcoded secrets detected
- [x] All paths are repo-relative
- [x] SSH configurations are secure
- [x] Security-weakening flags have warnings
- [x] Documentation-code consistency verified

**Recommendation**: APPROVED for [commit | merge]

Reference

Common Patterns to Catch

❌ Wrong: Hardcoded Secrets

# Bad example:
TELEGRAM_WEBHOOK_SECRET=wh_tg_prod_abc123def456
API_KEY="sk_live_1234567890abcdef"
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://user:password@host:5432/db

✅ Correct: Placeholder Values

# Good example:
TELEGRAM_WEBHOOK_SECRET=<your-webhook-secret>
API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY (set in .env)
DATABASE_URL=***REDACTED*** (see .env.example)

❌ Wrong: User-Specific Paths

# Bad example:
Repository path: /Users/colinaulds/Desktop/bigsirflrts
Screenshot location: ~/Desktop/project/docs/.scratch/

✅ Correct: Repo-Relative Paths

# Good example:
Repository path: <cloned to your local machine>
Screenshot location: docs/.scratch/<issue-id>/screenshots/

❌ Wrong: Insecure SSH

# Bad example:
Host production
  StrictHostKeyChecking no
  UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null

✅ Correct: Secure SSH

# Good example:
Host production
  StrictHostKeyChecking yes
  # Pre-populate known_hosts:
  # ssh-keyscan -p 22 hostname >> ~/.ssh/known_hosts

❌ Wrong: Security Flag Without Warning

# Bad example:
alias deploy='./deploy.sh --dangerously-skip-permissions'

✅ Correct: Security Flag With Warning

# Good example:
⚠️ **Security Warning:** This alias uses `--dangerously-skip-permissions` which bypasses safety controls. Only use in development environments.

alias deploy-dev='./deploy.sh --dangerously-skip-permissions'

Quick Reference: Security Scan Commands

Action Agent (pre-commit - docs only):

# Run all checks in one command:
grep -r -E "(secret|password|token|key|apiKey)[\s]*=[\s]*['\"]?[a-zA-Z0-9_./+-]{20,}" docs/ ; \
grep -r -E "(\/Users\/|\/home\/|C:\\\\Users\\\\|~\/Desktop)" docs/ ; \
grep -r -E "(StrictHostKeyChecking no|UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null)" docs/ ; \
grep -r -E "(--dangerously-skip-permissions|--no-verify|--insecure|-k|--allow-root|chmod 777)" docs/

QA Agent (pre-merge - docs + code):

# Full scan (docs + code):
for dir in docs src; do
  echo "=== Scanning $dir ==="
  grep -r -E "(secret|password|token|key|apiKey)[\s]*=[\s]*['\"]?[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{20,}" $dir
  grep -r -E "(\/Users\/|\/home\/|C:\\\\Users\\\\)" $dir
done

Related Tools

• grep: Pattern matching for security scan checks
• git add: Stage files after security validation passes
• Linear MCP: Report security findings via Linear comments

Related Documentation

• Original Reference: security-validation-checklist.md (deprecated - use this skill instead)
• Agent Prompts:
  • Action Agent: docs/agents/action/action-agent.md
  • QA Agent: docs/agents/qa/qa-agent.md
  • Planning Agent: docs/agents/planning/planning-agent.md
• Related Skills:
  • /test-quality-audit - Test quality validation patterns
  • /code-validation - Code hygiene and validation checks

Expected Impact

Before Security Validation Skill:

• 5 security issues per 8 PRs (45% of review comments)
• 4 path portability issues per 8 PRs (27% of review comments)
• Average 1.0 commits to fix per issue
• Delays in PR approval cycle

After Security Validation Skill:

• 80% reduction in security-related review comments
• 100% elimination of documentation portability issues
• Average <0.5 commits to fix per issue
• Faster PR approval (fewer review cycles)

Maintenance

Review Period: Re-audit every 10 merged PRs to measure effectiveness

Update Triggers:

• New security pattern emerges in code review
• False positive rate >10% on any check
• New security tool becomes available (e.g., gitleaks, secretlint)

Version History:

• v1.0 (2025-11-05): Converted from security-validation-checklist.md to skill format

---

For Planning Agent: Security Acceptance Criteria Template

When creating work blocks for documentation, configuration, or scripts, include:

**Security Requirements:**
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets in documentation (verified with `/security-validate`)
- [ ] All paths are repo-relative (no /Users/ or /home/ paths in docs)
- [ ] SSH configs use StrictHostKeyChecking yes (no disabled verification)
- [ ] Security-weakening flags have explicit warning blocks
- [ ] Documentation examples use placeholder values for secrets
- [ ] QA security scan passes before PR approval