advisor

name	advisor
version	0.0.3
description	Get an independent read-only second opinion at a commitment boundary, before substantive work on a hard task, when stuck or changing approach, or at a final review gate. Use for "consult the advisor", "get a second opinion", "ask codex", "ask Fable", or "ask a bigger model". The advisor returns guidance; the main session keeps execution and decision ownership.

Advisor

The main session borrows independent judgment at the few moments that determine whether the next hour of work is wasted. The advisor may be stronger, simply different, or context-clean. It never types the implementation; it advises.

You ARE the main executor and decision owner. The advisor is consulted, never delegated implementation. If another model should write bounded code, that is the coordinator worker pattern. Use orchestrator when the current main combines specialist agents, external workers, and an advisor.

When one advisor's verdict isn't enough — you want N independent perspectives or an adversarial panel voting on a finding — Claude Code's native Workflow tool runs judge panels as a deterministic script (opt-in gated, Claude-only); see ../coordinator/references/native-workflows.md. A single well-packaged consult remains the default; panels are for the highest-stakes calls.

The advisor's value is only partly the stronger model: a consult also arrives context-clean, free of this session's accumulated assumptions. That's why a consult can pay even between equal tiers — and why every consult package must stand alone.

Choosing the Advisor Channel

Four channels. Detect the current host and what exists before picking; never assume.

Channel	How it works	Prefer when
codex as advisor	Dispatch a read-only consult to codex (plugin or CLI)	A codex quota exists — subscription capacity is usually the cheapest premium intelligence available
Native advisor tool	Claude Code's built-in advisor (/advisor, advisorModel setting, --advisor flag): the executor consults a stronger Claude model mid-turn, server-side	The advisor should be a Claude model and the account has capacity for it
Premium Claude subagent	Spawn a read-only Agent (Read/Grep/Glob only) pinned to a stronger Claude model; it inspects the repo fresh and returns a verdict	The advisor should be Claude AND the question needs repo inspection the transcript doesn't carry
Fable CLI from Codex	Run a clean, read-only Claude Code print session using the configurable fable model-family alias	The main is Codex and an independent Claude opinion is valuable, especially for Claude-specific work

Passive detection depends on the host:

1. On Codex, check command -v claude, claude --version, and claude auth status. The Fable lane is unavailable if CLI authentication is unavailable; do not silently substitute another vendor.
2. On Claude, check command -v codex and whether codex:* plugin commands are available.
3. Is advisorModel set in ~/.claude/settings.json or the project's settings? (Slash commands are user-only — don't try to run /advisor.) If it's absent and the session wasn't launched with --advisor, treat the native channel as unconfigured and suggest the user run /advisor to enable it. CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL=1 in the environment means the native channel is off regardless.
4. The premium-subagent channel needs no install — but confirm the intended stronger model is actually available to the account (see the silent-downgrade footgun below); an unavailable pin degrades to the session model without erroring.
5. No channel available at all? Don't silently proceed unadvised — offer to enable one (the codex install/auth steps live in the coordinator skill's "Enabling a lane" section).
6. Present the finding and recommendation to the user before first use — "codex is installed; recommend it as advisor" or "advisorModel is already set to X; using the native tool" or "Claude CLI is authenticated; recommend the Fable lane" — and let them override. When multiple channels exist and the user has not expressed a preference, ask once, then keep the answer for the session.

From a Claude main, avoid launching another claude -p process unless the user asks; the native advisor or a native subagent is cleaner. The deliberate exception is the cross-host Fable channel from a Codex main. Its preflight must report which authentication path will be used because a fresh CLI invocation can draw from subscription capacity or bill an API key.

Native advisor notes

• The advisor sees the full transcript but runs toolless — it cannot read files or run commands. Put the evidence in the conversation (paste the failing output, the relevant snippet) before consulting, or the advisor advises blind.
• The advisor must be a Claude model at least as capable as the executor; invalid pairings are rejected outright.
• There is no setting to force or cap consult frequency — steer it with instructions ("consult the advisor before you continue") and the timing rules below.
• Advisor usage is billed/metered at the advisor model's own rates and counts against plan limits — a consult is never free. Budget accordingly.

Premium-subagent notes

• Pin the model on the Agent call and keep the toolset read-only — the advisor advises; it must not edit.
• Silent-downgrade footgun: when a pinned Claude model isn't available to the account, the subagent silently falls back to the session's model — the "advisor" becomes the executor consulting itself, and nothing errors. Require the advisor to state which model it is running as the first line of its reply; treat a session-tier answer as no consult and switch channels.
• It does not see this conversation — package the consult fully (see below). Like codex, it can read the repo, which the native advisor cannot.

Fable CLI from a Codex main

Use this channel when the current main is Codex and an independent Claude opinion is useful. It is especially valuable for reviewing Claude agents, hooks, plugin behavior, or prompts where a Claude-native perspective reduces guesswork.

Prepare the complete consult in a file. Feed it over stdin so shell quoting, prompt length, and repository text cannot become command interpolation:

ADVISOR_MODEL="${BOPEN_ADVISOR_MODEL:-fable}"
PROMPT_FILE="/absolute/path/to/prepared-advisor-consult.md"

env -u ANTHROPIC_API_KEY claude \
  --print \
  --safe-mode \
  --model "$ADVISOR_MODEL" \
  --effort high \
  --permission-mode plan \
  --tools "Read,Grep,Glob" \
  --no-session-persistence \
  < "$PROMPT_FILE"

• fable is a stable model-family alias chosen for this advisor lane, not a claim about a permanently latest version. Set BOPEN_ADVISOR_MODEL when the user chooses another available Claude model.
• --safe-mode keeps personal plugins, hooks, memory, and project prompt customizations out of the second opinion. This preserves context independence.
• --permission-mode plan plus Read,Grep,Glob makes the lane repository-aware but unable to edit or run shell commands. For a context-only consult, pass an empty tool list instead.
• --no-session-persistence prevents the consult from entering normal Claude session history. Remove it only when the user explicitly wants a resumable advisory thread.
• env -u ANTHROPIC_API_KEY deliberately prefers the signed-in Claude Code subscription rather than an ambient API key. If the user explicitly wants API billing, omit that prefix and disclose the change.

This is an external data boundary. The consult file and any repository files the read tools inspect can be sent to Anthropic. Before the first Fable consult, say what will be shared and obtain approval unless the user already explicitly authorized that lane for the task. Exclude secrets, credentials, and unrelated proprietary content.

If claude auth status fails, the selected model is unavailable, or the CLI reports a billing/authentication mismatch, stop and report the lane as unavailable. Do not silently replace Fable with a different advisor.

codex-as-advisor notes

• Read-only is correct here. Never add write flags to a consult — the advisor advises; it must not edit. Bare codex exec is read-only by default, which is right for once. The plugin is the opposite: it defaults tasks to a write-capable run unless the request reads as review/diagnosis/research-only — so when consulting through the plugin, phrase the dispatch explicitly as advisory ("advisory only, no edits") so it stays read-only.
• Unlike the native advisor, codex can read the repo (read-only). Prefer it for questions that require inspecting code the conversation hasn't seen; prefer the native channel for questions answerable from the transcript alone.
• With the plugin installed, consults can resume a thread (--resume) — an advisory thread that keeps context across consults is markedly better for follow-ups than a cold start each time.
• Demand structure or risk silence — an uninstructed codex run can return nothing. Use the advice contract below in every consult prompt.

The advice contract (all channels)

End every consult prompt with (verbatim or close):

Give a verdict, not a survey: "do X, not Y, because Z" plus the single risk that decides it. If the plan is sound, say so in one line — do not manufacture objections to justify the consult. If missing information would change the answer, name it precisely and say what each answer would imply. Keep it under 200 words unless the architecture genuinely demands more.

When to Consult

Consults happen at commitment boundaries — the decisions that determine whether the next hour of work is wasted: an architecture choice, a data migration, an API shape, a refactor strategy.

Consult before substantive work, not after. Orientation — finding files, reading code, reproducing the bug — is not substantive work; do that first so the consult is informed. Writing, editing, and committing to an interpretation are substantive.

• Before the first state-changing action on a hard or ambiguous task: plan sketched, evidence gathered, then one consult to pressure-test the approach before any file changes.
• When believing the task is complete — one consult as a review gate. Make the deliverable durable first (write the file, save the result): a consult takes time, and a durable result survives an interrupted session where an unwritten one doesn't.
• When the same problem has resisted two distinct attempts — a third attempt without new judgment is usually the first attempt again. Also when stuck more generally: errors recurring, approach not converging, results that don't fit the mental model.
• Before changing approach — the consult is cheaper than the rewrite.

Do NOT consult for mechanical steps, trivially verifiable facts, or anything a test run answers faster. Consults are metered; a session that consults on every turn has inverted the economics — and one that never consults on a hard task has wasted the safety net. A few consults per task, each at a real decision point, is the shape to aim for.

Packaging a Consult (external and subagent channels)

The advisor only knows what the consult carries. Include:

1. Goal — what the task is, one paragraph.
2. Constraints — what must not change, conventions in force.
3. State — what has been tried, what happened, current hypothesis.
4. Evidence — the failing output, the relevant snippet, or file paths for codex to read.
5. The question — one specific decision to advise on, not "thoughts?".
6. The advice contract from above.

Weighing the Advice

• Act on the verdict or surface the disagreement — never silently ignore it. Give the advice serious weight: the advisor is the stronger model, and it was consulted for a reason.
• If a recommended step fails empirically, or primary evidence contradicts a specific claim (the file says X, the advisor assumed Y), adapt — but don't silently switch. Surface the conflict in one reconcile consult: "I found X, you suggest Y — which constraint breaks the tie?" The advisor may have underweighted the evidence; a reconcile consult is cheaper than committing to the wrong branch.
• A passing self-test is NOT evidence the advice is wrong — it may be evidence the test doesn't check what the advice is checking.
• Report to the user when advice was sought and materially changed course; the consult trail is part of the work's reasoning.

Red Flags

Thought	Reality
"I'll just decide myself, consulting is a detour"	On a hard call, the consult is minutes; the wrong branch is hours. That's the trade this skill exists for.
"I'll skip the upfront consult and just confirm at the end"	The completion review gate doesn't replace the pre-work consult; advice that only ever arrives after the code exists becomes rubber-stamping.
"The advisor should just fix it"	Then it's not an advisor — that's the coordinator pattern upside down. Advice comes back; execution stays here.
"My test passed, so the advice was wrong"	The test may not measure what the advice addressed. Reconcile before discarding.
"I'll consult on every step to be safe"	Metered consults on mechanical steps invert the economics. Decision points only.
"The external advisor returned nothing, skip the consult"	Re-send once with the advice contract attached; silence is a transport/reporting failure, not a verdict.