| name | roundtable-debate |
| description | Structured multi-agent debate that preserves dissent with a mandatory devil's advocate and two-round cap |
| scope | core |
| user-invocable | true |
| argument-hint | <topic-or-document> [--rounds 1|2] [--decision required|advisory] |
| effort | high |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Roundtable Debate
Purpose
Run a bounded debate when convergence would hide useful disagreement. Unlike agora, which drives toward consensus, this workflow preserves minority positions and requires explicit justification before dismissing them.
When To Use
- Architecture or product choices with multiple defensible paths.
- Review work where anchoring or groupthink is likely.
- Decisions where a minority risk could be more important than the majority preference.
Workflow
- Independent-first analysis: spawn 3-5 reviewers in parallel. Do not share intermediate opinions before each reviewer submits an initial view.
- Mandatory devil's advocate: one reviewer argues against the emerging default, even if they personally agree with it.
- Round 1 synthesis: group findings into majority positions, minority positions, and unresolved facts.
- Round 2 challenge: reviewers respond only to disputed claims and missing evidence.
- Decision record: keep the final recommendation and any protected dissent.
Hard cap: two debate rounds. If the decision still depends on missing facts, stop and gather evidence instead of debating longer.
Output
# Roundtable Debate Result
## Topic
{topic}
## Majority Recommendation
{recommendation}
## Protected Dissent
| Position | Advocate | Why It Was Not Dismissed |
|----------|----------|--------------------------|
| {position} | devil's advocate | {evidence or risk} |
## Decision
{adopt | defer | reject | gather-more-evidence}
Relationship To Agora
| Workflow | Goal | Best For |
|---|
agora | adversarial consensus | release gates, spec approval |
roundtable-debate | dissent preservation | ambiguous strategy, architectural tradeoffs |
Use agora --anti-groupthink when you need consensus plus explicit dissent handling.