| name | agent-self-assessment |
| description | Assess the assistant's readiness, capability fit, safety risks, tool coverage, and verification plan before or during complex work. Use when work is high-impact, ambiguous, risky, long-running, or failure-prone. |
Agent Self Assessment
Purpose
Create an explicit readiness check before the assistant commits to complex action. This skill combines external reference agent audit and self-assessment ideas with Humungousaur capability, tool, policy, and cognition surfaces.
When To Use
Use for high-impact tasks, broad architecture changes, long autonomous runs, external integrations, multi-agent work, or when the assistant is unsure whether it has enough tools and context.
Inputs And Evidence
- Capability surface and tool descriptions.
- Current workspace state and relevant files.
- Model provider readiness.
- Safety policy and approval requirements.
- Known blockers, memory, and environment constraints.
Tool Map
capability_surface
tool_search
tool_describe
cognitive_self_review
cognitive_environment_status
system_status
plugin_catalog
channel_catalog
Workflow
- Clarify the objective and expected end state.
- Inspect capability surface and relevant tool schemas.
- Identify missing credentials, missing tools, policy gates, and high-risk actions.
- Decide whether to proceed, narrow scope, ask for input, or run a safer dry run.
- Define verification evidence before execution.
- Reassess after failures or surprising tool output.
Safety And Boundaries
- Do not use assessment as a substitute for doing safe, obvious work.
- Do not downplay risks when tools can affect external systems.
- If a model/provider is unavailable, stop or use explicit tool commands only; do not invent deterministic intent handling.
Safety And Approval
- Treat self-assessment as advisory evidence, not permission to bypass approval gates.
- If the assessment identifies external-visible, destructive, privileged, or privacy-sensitive actions, require the relevant tool approval before execution.
- Do not downgrade risk because a task is familiar; use current tool schemas, provider status, credentials, and workspace state.
- Report model-unavailable or tool-unavailable states honestly instead of substituting brittle keyword rules.
Native Implementation Boundaries
- Use Humungousaur capability, tool, cognition, plugin, channel, and system-status tools only.
- external reference or other references may shape the checklist, but readiness decisions must be model-led and evidence-backed through native records.
- A readiness claim is valid only for the current workspace/configuration snapshot; rerun assessment after tool, credential, branch, or environment changes.
Verification
- Assessment output should name capability gaps and verification steps.
- Any "ready" claim must be backed by current tool or status output.
- High-risk actions must show approval posture.
Failure Modes
- Producing a vague confidence score without evidence.
- Continuing after a missing credential blocks the actual requirement.
- Recommending tools that are not present in the catalog.
References
- Shortlist item:
agent-self-assessment.
- Upstream inspiration: external reference
agent-self-assessment, agent-audit.
- Humungousaur docs:
docs/GLOBAL_AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md.