Use when routing a finance-oriented empirical paper workflow, choosing between writing, packaging, reviewing, and revising stages, or when the user has empirical project materials, partial drafts, complete drafts, reviewer comments, or revised manuscripts and needs the next appropriate step.
Use when a complete finance-oriented empirical paper draft needs peer-review simulation, referee reports, scoring, editorial decision, revision roadmap, methodology critique, identification critique, field positioning critique, or Devil's Advocate stress testing in corporate finance, banking, private debt, syndicated loans, law and finance, or institutional-shock designs.
Use when organizing, drafting, integrating, or revising finance-oriented empirical papers from existing project materials, especially corporate finance, banking, private debt, syndicated loans, law and finance, institutional shocks, DID designs, manuscript chapters, result bundles, table maps, or reviewer revision roadmaps.
Use when revising an empirical finance or economics manuscript by comparing a specific section against the closest top-journal exemplars, especially for abstracts, introductions, literature positioning, data/sample sections, empirical design, results interpretation, or conclusion. Triggers include requests to find benchmark papers, extract local PDF text, compare paragraph-by-paragraph, diagnose top-journal language gaps, revise a manuscript copy, or validate revisions with an independent reviewer/subagent.