linkedin

name	linkedin
description	LinkedIn viral post generator with proven frameworks (121K+ impressions). Produces posts optimized for the LinkedIn algorithm using 12 post types, 50+ hooks, engagement psychology, and brand voice integration. Use when the user wants to write LinkedIn posts, build thought leadership, grow their personal brand on LinkedIn, or create viral content. Triggers on: LinkedIn, LinkedIn post, viral post, hook, engagement, thought leadership, personal brand, LinkedIn algorithm, LinkedIn content, post ideas, LinkedIn strategy.
user-invocable	false

LinkedIn Viral Post Creation

Create LinkedIn posts engineered for virality using proven frameworks, algorithm mechanics, and engagement psychology. Built from analysis of posts that generated 121K+ impressions.

Keywords

LinkedIn, LinkedIn post, viral post, hook, engagement, thought leadership, personal brand, LinkedIn algorithm, LinkedIn content, post ideas, LinkedIn strategy, LinkedIn growth, LinkedIn writing, content creation, professional brand, social selling, LinkedIn reach, impressions, LinkedIn comments, LinkedIn engagement, scroll-stopper, post format, carousel, content calendar

Philosophy

• Every post must deliver genuine value — virality without substance is noise
• Authenticity beats polish. Real stories outperform manufactured content
• The hook is everything — 80% of your effort should go into the first 2 lines
• One idea per post, executed with precision
• Write for the person scrolling at 11 PM, tired, deciding whether to keep reading
• Short sentences. One thought = one line. Max 10-15 words per sentence
• Your audience doesn't care about you. They care about themselves through the lens of your story

---

Configuration

Before writing, establish these preferences. If not specified, use defaults.

Language Preference

• Auto-detect: If brand/brand.json exists, check for language field and use it
• Ask if unclear: "What language should this post be in?"
• Default: English
• Bilingual markets: Some audiences respond better to native language (emotional connection) vs English (wider reach). When the user's brand targets a non-English-speaking market, suggest writing the hook + CTA in their native language for emotional punch, with body in English — or vice versa. Test both approaches
• Rule of thumb: Educational/framework posts perform better in English (wider reach). Story/vulnerability posts perform better in the author's native language (deeper emotional resonance)

Post Length Preference

• Short (700-1,000 chars): Quick insights, strong opinion, single idea. Best for busy audiences
• Medium (1,000-1,400 chars): The sweet spot. Enough depth without losing attention. DEFAULT
• Long (1,400-1,800 chars): Deep stories, case studies, detailed frameworks. Only when content demands it
• Warning: Under 700 chars = too thin for algorithm. Over 1,800 chars = reader drop-off spikes

Industry Context

Adjusts terminology, examples, and hashtag recommendations:

• Tech/SaaS — MRR, ARR, churn, product-led, API, DevOps
• Agency/Consulting — clients, retainers, case studies, proposals, deliverables
• E-commerce/DTC — ROAS, AOV, LTV, supply chain, fulfillment
• Creative/Design — portfolio, brand, visual identity, UX, typography
• Finance/Fintech — compliance, regulation, risk, returns, portfolio
• Healthcare/Biotech — patients, outcomes, clinical, regulatory, trials
• Education/EdTech — learners, curriculum, outcomes, engagement, retention
• General startup — product-market fit, fundraising, scaling, hiring

Target Audience

Who is reading this post:

• Founders/CEOs — strategic, big-picture, investor-aware
• Developers/Engineers — technical, skeptical of buzzwords, values precision
• Marketers — trend-aware, metrics-driven, creative
• Sales professionals — results-oriented, competitive, practical
• Executives/VPs — leadership-focused, ROI-driven, time-constrained
• Job seekers/Career changers — aspirational, skill-building, relatable
• General professional — broad appeal, universal themes

Personal Brand Archetype

How the author presents themselves:

• Thought Leader — bold opinions, industry predictions, frameworks
• Practitioner — "in the trenches" stories, tactical advice, real metrics
• Storyteller — narrative-driven, emotional, journey-focused
• Data-Driven — numbers first, analysis, research-backed claims
• Mentor — teaching focus, career advice, nurturing tone
• Contrarian — challenges status quo, provocative, evidence-backed rebellion

---

Brand Integration

Before writing any post, check if brand/brand.json exists in the project.

If brand files exist:

1. Read brand/brand.json for core identity
2. Read brand/tone-of-voice.md and adapt the writing style
3. Apply the brand's voice spectrums:
   • Formal ←→ Casual (where does this brand sit?)
   • Technical ←→ Simple (jargon level)
   • Bold ←→ Diplomatic (how strong are opinions stated?)
   • Serious ←→ Playful (humor and energy level)
   • Personal ←→ Institutional (first person vs company voice)
4. Use the brand's vocabulary patterns and terminology
5. Respect platform adaptation rules (LinkedIn = professional context)
6. Maintain brand personality while following LinkedIn best practices
7. Check for brand-specific topics to emphasize or avoid

If no brand files exist:

Use a professional but conversational default voice:

• Confident, direct, specific — not corporate or stiff
• First-person perspective, sharing from experience
• Warm but authoritative tone
• Suggest running /imperium:create-brand for consistency across posts

Voice Calibration Table

Brand Spectrum	LinkedIn Adjustment
Very formal	Slightly relax — LinkedIn rewards conversational tone even from formal brands
Very casual	Slightly tighten — LinkedIn audience expects professional baseline
Very technical	Add "translation" lines for broader reach while keeping credibility
Very simple	Add 1-2 specific data points to build authority
Very bold	Ensure bold claims have backing — LinkedIn audiences fact-check
Very diplomatic	Add at least one clear position — fence-sitting kills engagement

---

Core Writing Rules

The 80/20 of LinkedIn Posts

The hook (first 140-210 characters before "see more") determines 80% of your post's success. Everything else is secondary.

Formatting Rules

• Line break after every 1-2 sentences
• Use white space aggressively — dense text kills engagement
• One thought per line. Max 10-15 words per sentence
• Short paragraphs: 1-2 sentences maximum
• Never put links in the post body (kills reach 25-50%) — use first comment
• Use unicode characters sparingly for visual breaks (→ ↓ • ― /)
• Numbers are more compelling than words ("3x" not "triple", "$12K MRR" not "significant revenue")
• 70% of LinkedIn users are on mobile — format for small screens

Voice Rules

• Use "you" more than "I" — make it about the reader
• Be specific: not "I grew my business" but "I went from $0 to $12K MRR in 9 months"
• Authentic > polished — imperfect but real beats perfect but sterile
• Vulnerability builds connection — share failures, not just wins
• Confident assertions, not hedging ("This works" not "I think this might work")
• Specificity = credibility. Precise numbers signal authenticity over vague claims

Value Rules

• Every post must pass the "so what?" test
• Always add value — never just flex
• Teach something, share something, or make someone feel seen
• The reader should be able to DO something after reading your post
• If you can't articulate the takeaway in one sentence, the post isn't focused enough

Anti-Patterns (Never Do These)

• "Excited to announce..." / "I'm humbled..." / "Big news!" — dead hooks
• Wall of text without empty lines
• Link IN the post body (put in first comment!)
• More than 5 hashtags (triggers spam filter)
• Question at the beginning instead of at the end
• Post and ghost (not responding to comments)
• Obvious AI-generated content (-30% reach, -55% engagement)
• Engagement bait ("Like if...", "Comment YES for...")
• Generic hooks that could be written by anyone
• Starting with "I" (posts starting with "You" or a number get 23% more engagement)

---

Post Structure Formula

Every high-performing LinkedIn post follows this architecture:

HOOK (1-2 lines — must stop the scroll, 140-210 chars max)
↓
CONTEXT (2-3 lines — set the scene, make it relatable)
↓
BODY (5-10 lines — the meat, the insight, the story)
↓
LESSON/INSIGHT (2-3 lines — the takeaway they'll remember)
↓
CTA (1-2 lines — question at END, never beginning)

Max 2 CTAs per post. Question goes at the END (not the beginning — LinkedIn's algorithm measures comments after scroll-through, and a question at the top gets dismissed before context is established).

---

The 12 Post Types — Quick Reference

#	Type	Best For	Viral Potential	Key Element
1	Personal Story	Emotional resonance, relatability	Very High	Transformation arc
2	Product Launch	New product/feature awareness	Medium	Start with THEIR pain
3	Hiring Post	Team building, employer brand	Medium	"I don't have X" > "We're hiring X"
4	Thought Leadership	Authority, bold positioning	High	Controversial but defensible
5	Tech/Industry News	Timeliness, relevance	Medium-High	YOUR filter on news
6	Milestone	Social proof, journey sharing	Medium	Journey + numbers
7	Educational/How-To	Authority, saves	High	Numbered steps, actionable
8	Case Study	Credibility, lead generation	High	Specific metrics, before/after
9	Behind the Scenes	Authenticity, connection	High	Authenticity > polish
10	Question/Poll	Comment driving, discussion	Medium	Specific, not generic
11	Listicle	Saves, shares, easy consumption	High	Your commentary adds value
12	Contrarian/Myth-Busting	Debate, thought leadership	Very High	Evidence-backed alternative

Full templates, formulas, and 2-3 examples per type: references/post-types.md

---

Hooks — Top 10 Quick Reference

The 10 highest-performing hook structures:

1. Transformation: "[Time] ago I was [humble situation]. Today I [impressive outcome]."
2. Challenge: "Stop doing [common practice]. Do this instead."
3. Stat shock: "[Specific number]% of [group] fail at [thing]. Here's why."
4. Before/After: "[Time] ago I was [situation]. Today [outcome]. Here's what changed."
5. Unpopular opinion: "Unpopular opinion: [bold statement]"
6. Authority: "I've [credibility marker]. Here's what I know for sure."
7. Myth-bust: "Most people think [X]. They're wrong."
8. Mistake: "The #1 mistake [professionals] make (and how to fix it)"
9. Insider: "I asked [impressive person/number] one question. Their answer surprised me."
10. Reframe: "You don't need [thing everyone says you need]. You need [alternative]."

Complete library of 50+ hooks with templates and examples: references/hooks.md

---

LinkedIn Algorithm 2025 — Key Rules

Content Scoring (in order of weight):

1. Dwell time — how long people stop scrolling to read (#1 factor)
2. Comments — meaningful comments (15+ words) = 15x more valuable than likes
3. Engagement velocity — how fast engagement arrives in first 90 minutes
4. Saves — 1 save = 5x the reach value of 1 like
5. Shares — redistributing to new networks
6. Reactions — likes and other reactions (lowest weight)

Critical Numbers:

• External links in post body: -25% to -40% reach
• 5+ hashtags: spam filter trigger
• Golden Hour (first 60-90 min): determines 70% of total reach
• Respond to every comment in first 15 minutes
• Best timing: Tuesday-Thursday, 8:00-10:00 AM (target audience timezone)
• Obvious AI content: -30% reach, -55% engagement
• Carousel posts: 278% more engagement than video, 596% more than text-only
• Post without image: 50% less reach (use 1080x1350px portrait format)
• Photos with YOU in them: +60% reach vs stock photos

Four-Phase Distribution:

1. Classification (0-60 min) — AI scans for spam signals
2. Golden Hour (1-2 hours) — Small sample, measures comments/dwell/clicks
3. Extended Distribution (2-24 hours) — Strong engagement = expansion
4. Long-tail (24+ hours) — Can resurface 2-3 weeks later

Full algorithm deep-dive: references/algorithm-2025.md

---

Engagement Psychology — Quick Reference

Why people engage — and how to trigger each behavior ethically:

Principle	What It Does	How to Use
Pattern Interrupt	1.7 seconds to stop the thumb	Unexpected first line, broken expectations
Curiosity Gap	927% more clicks when loop is opened	Show result, hide method in hook
Zeigarnik Effect	Incomplete tasks remembered 90% better	Leave a loop in hook, close in body
Mirror Neurons	Stories remembered 22x better than facts	Vivid sensory details in narratives
Loss Aversion	Pain of loss ~2x stronger than joy of gain	"Don't make this mistake" > "Do this instead"
Specificity Bias	Precise numbers signal credibility	"$47,832" > "almost $50K"
Social Proof	People follow what others validate	Include metrics, client results, follower counts
Identity Signaling	People share what reflects well on them	Write posts people are PROUD to share
Underdog Effect	People root for the disadvantaged fighter	Humble beginnings → impressive outcome
Reciprocity	People engage back when you engage first	15-20 min engaging before your post
Mere Exposure	Familiarity breeds trust (7-11 touchpoints)	Post consistently, 3-5x per week
Cognitive Load	70% mobile users = limited attention	Short sentences, white space, scannable format

Full psychology guide: references/psychology.md

---

Advanced Tactics — Quick Reference

• Golden Hour Strategy: Pre-post engagement → Publish → Reply within 15 min → Monitor 60-90 min
• Commenting Strategy: 15-20 min engaging before posting, 10 quality comments daily on others' posts
• Content Calendar: Weekly themes, batch 5-10 posts in one session
• Content Repurposing (3-5x Rule): One idea → text post, carousel, thread, newsletter, video
• Monetization Pipeline: 70% educational → 20% problem-solution → 10% promotional
• A/B Testing: Same topic, different hooks. Same hook, different post types. Track everything
• Inner Circle: Build 10-15 creator relationships for mutual amplification
• AI Best Practices: Use AI for structure, never for voice. Edit heavily. Add personal details AI can't know

Full tactics guide: references/tactics.md

---

Quality Score (/80)

Rate every post across 8 dimensions, each scored 0-10. Target: 60+ for publish, 70+ for high-confidence viral.

#	Dimension	0-3 (Weak)	4-6 (Decent)	7-10 (Strong)
1	Hook Power	Generic, skippable, starts with "I"	Interesting but not scroll-stopping	Impossible to not click "see more"
2	Specificity	Vague, no numbers, generic claims	Some data but still fuzzy	Exact numbers, names, dates, metrics
3	Value Density	Filler, obvious advice, nothing new	Useful but available elsewhere	Actionable insight reader can't get elsewhere
4	Emotional Resonance	Flat, corporate, no feeling	Mildly engaging, some personality	Makes reader feel something — seen, inspired, challenged
5	Formatting	Wall of text, no breaks	Some formatting but dense sections	Perfect white space, 1-2 sentence paragraphs, mobile-optimized
6	Readability	Complex sentences, jargon, 12+ grade	Mixed clarity, some jargon	8th grade level or below, every sentence crystal clear
7	CTA Strength	No CTA or weak generic question	Question present but uninspiring	Specific question reader is COMPELLED to answer
8	Brand Alignment	Off-brand or no voice consistency	Partially aligned	Voice, vocabulary, and personality perfectly calibrated

Readability target: Flesch-Kincaid 8th grade level or below. Short words, short sentences, active voice. If a 14-year-old can't understand it, simplify.

Scoring guide:

• 60-69: Publishable with minor polish
• 70-79: Strong post, likely to perform well
• 80: Perfect score — rare, aim for 70+

---

Pre-Post Checklist

Before publishing any post, verify:

• Hook test: Would YOU click "see more"? Read it as a stranger
• One idea test: Can you state the core message in one sentence?
• Specificity test: Are there numbers, names, timeframes — not vague claims?
• Value test: Does the reader learn something or feel something?
• Format test: Line breaks, short paragraphs, 1,000-1,500 chars, mobile-friendly?
• Link test: No external links in body? (Move to first comment)
• CTA test: Question or invitation to engage at the END?
• Hashtag test: 3-5 relevant hashtags, mix of broad + niche?
• Voice test: Reads naturally out loud? No corporate jargon?
• Brand test: Aligned with brand voice (if brand files exist)?
• AI test: Does NOT sound AI-generated? Personal details present? Imperfections kept?
• Image test: Do you have an image? Photo of YOU > illustration > no image
• First comment test: Is your first comment ready? (link, resource, or bonus insight)

---

Image Strategy

• Post without image = 50% less reach
• Best: Photos with YOU in them (+60% reach over stock)
• Good: Split images (before/after, comparison), custom graphics
• Acceptable: Relevant screenshots, data visualizations
• Format: 1080x1350px portrait (takes up maximum feed space on mobile)
• Carousel: 8-12 slides, each slide = one clear point, first slide = hook, last slide = CTA
• Never: Stock photos that feel generic, AI-generated art that looks artificial

---

Reference Files

File	Content
references/post-types.md	All 12 post types with formulas, 2-3 full examples each, common mistakes
references/hooks.md	50+ hooks organized by 9 categories, templates + filled examples, performance tiers
references/algorithm-2025.md	Four-phase distribution, engagement weights, penalties, timing, format performance, SSI
references/psychology.md	12 psychological principles, sharing triggers, controversy calibration, parasocial relationships
references/tactics.md	Golden Hour strategy, commenting, content calendar, repurposing, metrics, A/B testing, DMs