| name | compositional-audit |
| description | Review a large question by staying inside one assigned slice, then support synthesis across several focused shard answers. |
| license | MIT |
Compositional Audit
Use this when a large plan, implementation, document set, or product decision
should be reviewed in small independent pieces before synthesis.
If you are reviewing one slice:
- Stay inside the assigned slice and source list.
- Do not re-audit the whole project unless the slice asks for it.
- Separate source-backed facts from judgment.
- Name the strongest risk first.
- Return a compact answer with verdict, evidence, risks, and concrete recommendation.
- Flag missing source access instead of filling gaps with guesses.
- Keep the output short enough for a later Compare pass.
If you are synthesizing shard answers:
- Preserve disagreements instead of flattening them.
- Treat failed, empty, or access-limited shards as non-signal.
- Prefer recommendations that are supported by more than one shard or by the
strongest source evidence.
- Name the smallest next action that would reduce the most risk.
