Design automated email sequences and drip campaigns. Use when building onboarding flows, nurture sequences, re-engagement campaigns, or follow-up automation.
Installation
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Design automated email sequences and drip campaigns. Use when building onboarding flows, nurture sequences, re-engagement campaigns, or follow-up automation.
license
MIT
Email Sequences
Design and run automated email sequences (drip campaigns) that convert without fatiguing recipients or damaging sender reputation.
When to use this skill
Building an onboarding, nurture, re-engagement, or winback sequence
Deciding how many emails to include and how far apart to space them
Setting up entry triggers and exit conditions for automated flows
Adding branching logic based on opens, clicks, replies, or behavior
Running A/B tests within a sequence (subject lines, content, timing)
Diagnosing why a sequence has declining engagement or rising unsubscribes
Preventing overlap between multiple sequences hitting the same contact
Related skills
onboarding-emails - deep dive on welcome and activation sequences specifically
cold-outreach - cold email follow-up sequences (different rules, different infrastructure)
email-copywriting - writing emails people actually read
sender-reputation - monitoring and recovering reputation
Sequence types and recommended structure
Different goals require different sequence shapes. Here are the common types with proven structures.
Onboarding / welcome
Goal: get a new user to their first success moment.
Step
Timing
Content
1
Immediate
Welcome + single most important next action
2
Day 1
Quick win - help them complete one key task
3
Day 3
Feature highlight relevant to their use case
4
Day 5
Social proof - how others succeeded
5
Day 7
Check-in - ask if they need help
Length: 3-5 emails over 7-10 days. Welcome emails get 60%+ open rates - the rest of the sequence won't match that. Front-load your most important content.
Exit when: user completes the activation milestone (not just opens an email).
Lead nurture
Goal: move a prospect from awareness to purchase readiness.
Step
Timing
Content
1
Day 0
Value-first content related to their interest
2
Day 3
Educational content addressing a pain point
3
Day 7
Case study or social proof
4
Day 10
How your product solves their specific problem
5
Day 14
Soft CTA - free trial, demo, consultation
6
Day 21
Final value piece + direct CTA
Length: 5-8 emails over 2-4 weeks. Space emails 2-4 days apart. Never more than 3 emails per week.
Exit when: prospect converts (signs up, books demo, makes purchase) or replies.
Re-engagement
Goal: revive contacts who stopped opening or clicking.
Step
Timing
Content
1
Day 0
"We noticed you've been quiet" + best recent content
2
Day 4
What's new since they disengaged
3
Day 10
Direct ask - "still interested?" with easy opt-out
Length: 2-3 emails over 10-14 days. Shorter is better - if 3 emails don't re-engage them, more won't either.
Exit when: contact engages (opens, clicks), or after the final email. If no engagement after the sequence, move to suppression or reduce to quarterly cadence.
Winback
Goal: recover a cancelled customer or lost deal.
Step
Timing
Content
1
Day 1 after cancellation
Acknowledge + ask why
2
Day 7
Address common objections + what's changed
3
Day 14
Incentive offer (if applicable)
4
Day 30
Final reach-out + easy re-activation path
Length: 3-4 emails over 30 days. Wider spacing - they just left, so don't be aggressive.
Exit when: customer re-activates, replies, or explicitly declines.
Upsell / cross-sell
Goal: expand an existing customer relationship.
Step
Timing
Content
1
Triggered by usage milestone
Congratulate + introduce next tier/feature
2
Day 3
How similar customers benefited from the upgrade
3
Day 7
ROI comparison or specific value unlock
Length: 2-3 emails. Only trigger when usage data actually supports the upsell. Untargeted upsells annoy people fast.
Exit when: customer upgrades, dismisses, or replies.
Timing and cadence
Spacing between emails
The right gap depends on urgency and sequence type:
Context
Minimum gap
Sweet spot
Maximum gap
Post-signup onboarding
1 day
2 days
3 days
Lead nurture
2 days
3-4 days
7 days
Re-engagement
3 days
4-5 days
7 days
Winback
5 days
7 days
14 days
Post-purchase education
2 days
3-4 days
7 days
Never send more than 3 emails per week to the same contact across all sequences combined. This is the single most important cadence rule. Exceeding this drives unsubscribes and spam complaints regardless of how good the content is.
Send timing
Weekdays outperform weekends for B2B. Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday are the strongest days.
B2C is more flexible - weekends can work for consumer products, especially Saturday morning.
Send during business hours in the recipient's timezone. 9 AM - 3 PM local time gets the best open rates.
Avoid Monday morning and Friday afternoon. Inboxes are either overloaded or already mentally checked out.
Fatigue scoring
Track engagement signals per contact and adjust cadence dynamically. A simple fatigue model:
Fatigue score components:
- Send frequency (0-30 points): >5/week = 30, >3/week = 20, >1/week = 10
- Monthly volume (0-15 points): >20/month = 15, >10/month = 10, >5/month = 5
- Bounces (0-20 points): each bounce = 10 points (cap at 20)
- Complaints (0-25 points): each complaint = 15 points (cap at 25)
- Engagement decay (0-10 points): >30 days since last engagement = 10
Thresholds:
- Score >= 70: stop sending
- Score >= 40: reduce frequency
- Score < 40: safe to send
When the fatigue score hits "reduce frequency," double the gap between sequence emails. When it hits "stop sending," pause the sequence and move the contact to a re-engagement flow instead.
Entry triggers
Event-based triggers (best)
Start a sequence when a specific event occurs:
Signup completed - onboarding sequence
Trial started - trial nurture sequence
Cart abandoned - recovery sequence (send within 1 hour)
Feature milestone reached - upsell sequence
Subscription cancelled - winback sequence
Inactivity threshold - re-engagement sequence (e.g., no login for 14 days)
Event triggers are the most reliable because they're based on something the contact actually did (or stopped doing).
Segment-based triggers
Enroll contacts when they match specific criteria:
Segment: "Trial users who used Feature X but not Feature Y"
Filter:
- lifecycle_stage = "trial"
- AND event_count("feature_x_used", last 7 days) > 0
- AND event_count("feature_y_used", last 7 days) = 0
Segment-based triggers are powerful for targeting specific user profiles but require clean data. Evaluate segments on a schedule (daily or hourly), not continuously, to avoid race conditions.
Manual enrollment
For sales-driven sequences where a human decides to enroll a prospect. Always check suppression status before enrollment.
Trigger rules
One trigger per sequence. If multiple events should start the same email flow, route them through a single entry point that deduplicates.
Deduplicate enrollments. A contact should only have one active run per sequence. If the trigger fires again while they're already in the sequence, ignore it.
Check suppressions at enrollment. Don't enroll contacts who have unsubscribed, complained, or hard-bounced.
Exit conditions
Exit conditions determine when to stop sending to a contact before the sequence finishes naturally. Get these wrong and you'll send irrelevant emails that damage trust and deliverability.
Required exit conditions
Every sequence needs these:
Goal achieved. The contact did the thing the sequence was designed to produce (purchased, activated, booked a demo). This is the happy path exit.
Explicit opt-out. The contact unsubscribed or replied asking to stop. Honor immediately - not after the next scheduled email.
Hard bounce. The email address doesn't exist. Remove from the sequence and suppress.
Spam complaint. Stop all email to this contact, not just the current sequence.
Reply received. In most cases, a reply means the conversation should move to a human or a different flow. Continuing the automated sequence after a reply looks robotic and damages trust.
Recommended exit conditions
Entered a higher-priority sequence. If a lead nurture contact starts a free trial, they should exit the nurture sequence and enter the onboarding sequence instead.
Fatigue threshold crossed. If the contact's engagement has been declining across all email, pause rather than keep sending.
Negative signal detected. If inbound reply classification detects intent like "objection" or "not_now," exit the sequence and route appropriately.
Implementing exit conditions
Check exit conditions at two points:
At enrollment - don't start a sequence for a suppressed contact
Before each step executes - re-evaluate conditions before every send, not just at enrollment
This matters because a contact might reply between step 2 and step 3. If you only check conditions at enrollment, step 3 fires anyway.
Before executing step N:
1. Is the contact suppressed? -> exit
2. Has the contact achieved the goal? -> exit
3. Has the contact replied? -> exit (route to human/different flow)
4. Is the contact in a higher-priority sequence? -> exit
5. Does the fatigue score say "stop"? -> exit
6. Has the contact complained about any email? -> exit
All clear -> execute step N
Branching logic
Branching transforms a linear sequence into an adaptive flow that responds to what each contact does.
Behavioral branches
Branch based on what the contact did (or didn't do) in previous steps:
Branch based on contact attributes, not just behavior:
If contact.lifecycle_stage == "enterprise":
-> send enterprise case study
Else:
-> send SMB case study
Time-based branches
Branch based on when the contact entered or how long they've been in the sequence:
If days_since_enrollment > 30 and no_engagement:
-> move to re-engagement track
Else:
-> continue nurture
Keep branching simple
Every branch doubles the paths you need to test and maintain. In practice:
1-2 branch points per sequence works well
3+ branch points creates complexity that rarely improves results enough to justify the maintenance cost
If you need heavy branching, you probably need separate sequences for separate segments instead
A/B testing within sequences
What to test
Test one variable at a time within a single step. The most impactful variables, in order:
Subject line - highest impact, easiest to test
Send time - morning vs. afternoon, different days
CTA - button text, placement, number of CTAs
Content length - short vs. long
Content approach - educational vs. social proof vs. direct pitch
How to test
For each step you want to test, create variants with different weights:
Step 3 - Feature highlight:
Variant A (50%): "3 ways to use [feature]" (educational)
Variant B (50%): "How [company] increased revenue 40% with [feature]" (social proof)
Use deterministic assignment - the same contact should always see the same variant if re-evaluated. Hash-based bucketing (hash of experiment ID + contact email) ensures consistency without storing assignments upfront.
Statistical significance
Don't call a winner too early. You need enough data:
Minimum sample size: at least 200-300 sends per variant before drawing conclusions
Run time: let the test run for at least one full cycle through the step (all contacts in the current cohort should have received it)
A two-proportion z-test works for comparing conversion rates between variants. If your control converts at 5% and the variant converts at 7%, you need roughly 1,500 sends per variant to detect that difference with 95% confidence.
What to measure
Don't optimize for opens alone. Measure by step position:
Metric
Use for
Open rate
Subject line tests
Click rate
CTA and content tests
Reply rate
Nurture and outreach sequences
Conversion rate
The actual goal metric - sign up, purchase, activation
Unsubscribe rate
Safety check - if a variant increases unsubs, kill it regardless of other metrics
Sequence performance metrics
Per-step metrics
Track these for every step in the sequence:
Metric
What it tells you
Action threshold
Delivery rate
Infrastructure health
< 95% = fix bounces/list quality
Open rate
Subject line + sender relevance
< 15% = rework subject or timing
Click rate
Content + CTA relevance
< 1.5% = rework content or CTA
Reply rate
Engagement quality
Depends on sequence type
Unsubscribe rate
Fatigue / relevance
> 0.5% per step = rethink content or cadence
Spam complaint rate
Serious reputation risk
> 0.1% = stop and investigate
Sequence-level metrics
Metric
How to calculate
Healthy range
Completion rate
Contacts who reached last step / total enrolled
40-70% (varies by length)
Goal conversion rate
Contacts who achieved goal / total enrolled
Depends on goal
Step-over-step retention
Opens at step N / opens at step N-1
> 80% step-to-step
Average time to conversion
Mean time from enrollment to goal event
Track trend, not absolute
Revenue per sequence run
Total attributed revenue / total runs
Compare across sequences
Drop-off analysis
The most actionable sequence metric is where people stop engaging. Plot open/click rates by step:
A steep drop between specific steps means something is wrong with that email or the gap before it. A gradual decline across all steps means the sequence is too long.
Attribution
Tie sequence sends to business outcomes. Each email in the sequence is a touchpoint, and when a contact converts, attribute the conversion to the steps that preceded it.
Common attribution models for sequences:
Last touch: credit the final email before conversion. Simple but undervalues earlier nurturing steps.
First touch: credit the first email. Useful for measuring which sequences initiate journeys that eventually convert.
Linear: equal credit to every step the contact received. Best default for sequence optimization.
Time decay: more credit to recent touches. Good for long sequences where later steps are more directly influential.
Preventing sequence overlap
When a contact is eligible for multiple sequences, you need rules to prevent them from getting buried in email.
Regardless of how many sequences a contact is in, cap the total sends per contact:
Maximum 3 emails per week across all sequences combined
Maximum 10 emails per month across all sequences combined
Minimum 24-hour gap between any two emails to the same contact
When a sequence step is due but the contact has hit their send budget, delay it - don't skip it. Skipping creates holes in the sequence logic.
Cooldown enforcement
Enforce cooldowns at the infrastructure level, not in sequence logic. The sequence shouldn't need to know about other sequences - it just sends, and the policy layer blocks if cooldown hasn't elapsed.
{"status":"blocked","reason":"cooldown","detail":"Contact received a message 18 hours ago. Cooldown is 48h.","nextEligibleAt":"2026-03-31T08:00:00Z"}
The sequence engine reschedules the step for nextEligibleAt and continues normally.
Sequence architecture
State management
Each sequence run needs to track:
Run ID - unique identifier for this contact's run through this sequence
Current step - which step is next
Status - active, paused, completed, exited
Context - data collected during the run (which branches taken, engagement data)
Enrollment time - when the contact entered
The key architectural decision: the sequence engine should be stateful, but email sending should be stateless. The engine tracks where each contact is in the sequence. Each individual send goes through the same policy evaluation as any other email - deduplication, suppression, rate limiting, cooldown.
Step types
A well-designed sequence engine supports these step types:
Type
Purpose
send
Send an email using a specific template
delay
Wait a specified duration before the next step
branch
Evaluate conditions and route to different steps
end
Terminate the sequence run
Example journey definition:
{"name":"Trial nurture","triggerEvent":"trial.started","steps":[{"type":"send","position":1,"config":{"templateId":"trial-welcome","payload":{"subject":"Welcome to your trial"}}},{"type":"delay","position":2,"config":{"delayMinutes":4320}},{"type":"branch","position":3,"config":{"conditions":[{"field":"hasCompletedSetup","operator":"eq","value":true}],"onMatch":{"nextStep":5},"onNoMatch":{"nextStep":4}}},{"type":"send","position":4,"config":{"templateId":"trial-setup-help","payload":{"subject":"Need help getting started?"}}},{"type":"send","position":5,"config":{"templateId":"trial-power-features","payload":{"subject":"3 features most teams discover in week 2"}}},{"type":"delay","position":6,"config":{"delayMinutes":7200}},{"type":"send","position":7,"config":{"templateId":"trial-ending-soon","payload":{"subject":"Your trial ends in 3 days"}}},{"type":"end","position":8}]}
Deduplication
Each contact should only have one active run per sequence. If the trigger event fires again while a run is active, the second run should be rejected. This prevents the most common sequence failure: a customer getting duplicate emails because multiple instances of an automation detected the same condition.
Use a dedupe key composed of journeyId + contactEmail and check for active runs before creating a new one.
Reply handling
When a contact replies to a sequence email, the reply should be classified by intent and routed accordingly:
Intent
Action
interested
Exit sequence, route to sales/human
objection
Exit sequence, route to human review
not_now
Pause sequence, schedule re-evaluation in 30 days
out_of_office
Keep in sequence, extend delays by OOO duration
unsubscribe
Exit sequence, add to suppression list
Continuing to send automated emails after someone has replied is the fastest way to get spam complaints. Even if the reply is just "thanks," pause the sequence and evaluate.
Common mistakes
1. No exit conditions beyond sequence completion
The sequence has 7 steps, so every contact gets all 7 emails regardless of what happens. A contact who purchased after step 2 still gets step 3-7 ("here's why you should buy"). This is the most common sequence mistake and the most damaging to trust.
Fix: Implement goal-based exits. Check before every step whether the contact has already achieved the sequence goal.
2. Ignoring replies
Contact replies "Not interested right now" and still gets the next 4 emails on schedule. Nothing says "automated" louder than ignoring a direct response.
Fix: Classify inbound replies by intent and exit or pause the sequence when a reply is received.
3. No cross-sequence coordination
A contact is in the onboarding sequence, the trial expiration sequence, AND the feature education sequence simultaneously. They get 3 emails on Tuesday.
Fix: Implement a global send budget per contact. Cap at 3 emails/week across all sequences. Use sequence priority to determine which emails get delayed when the budget is hit.
4. Testing on opens instead of conversions
You A/B test subject lines and pick the variant with higher opens. But the high-open variant had clickbait subjects that led to lower conversions. Opens are a proxy metric, not the goal.
Fix: Measure the metric that matters for the sequence goal - conversion rate, activation rate, revenue per contact.
5. Sequences that are too long
A 12-email nurture sequence running over 8 weeks. By step 8, open rates are 5% and you're just training spam filters. Engagement data consistently shows that most reply/conversion value comes from the first 4-5 emails.
Fix: Start with 3-5 emails. Add steps only when data shows contacts are still engaging at that point in the sequence.
6. Same content to everyone
A single nurture sequence for all leads regardless of industry, company size, or stated interest. The content is generic enough to be irrelevant to everyone.
Fix: Use segment-based branching or separate sequences for meaningfully different audiences. Two well-targeted 4-email sequences beat one generic 8-email sequence.
7. No warmup for sequence volume
You build a 5-step sequence and enroll 10,000 contacts on day one. Even if the emails are great, sending 10,000 emails from a new template in the first hour triggers rate limits and spam filters.
Fix: Ramp enrollment gradually. Start with 100-200 contacts, monitor delivery and engagement, then increase by 2x every few days. See the email-warmup skill.
8. Sending during cooldown windows
The sequence engine doesn't know about the cooldown from yesterday's transactional email, so it fires step 3 six hours after a receipt email. The contact gets two emails in half a day.
Fix: Enforce cooldowns at the infrastructure level, not in the sequence. Every send - whether from a sequence, a transactional trigger, or a one-off campaign - goes through the same policy engine. The sequence should handle "blocked: cooldown" responses by rescheduling, not by skipping.
Checklist: launching a new sequence
Sequence has a clear, measurable goal (not "engagement" - a specific conversion event)
Entry trigger is defined and deduplication is in place
