en un clic
agents-rules-skills
agents-rules-skills contient 17 skills collectées depuis Desquared, avec une couverture métier par dépôt et des pages de détail sur le site.
Skills dans ce dépôt
Analyze Jetpack Compose UI hierarchies and suggest MVVM/MVI or other architectural improvements. Use when reviewing existing Compose code, creating new Compose components, analyzing composable structure, or when the user asks about Compose architecture patterns. Best for code review and refactoring guidance.
Reviews Swift function, type, and protocol interfaces for alignment with the Swift API Design Guidelines, with emphasis on call-site clarity, naming, parameter labeling, mutability conventions, and modern async/throws patterns. Use for public APIs, reusable components, SDKs, and shared modules.
Identifies potential performance bottlenecks in Jetpack Compose code including expensive recompositions, unnecessary redraws, and memory issues. Use when code involves lists, animations, complex UI, or when the user asks about performance optimization.
Review function and class interfaces for Kotlin Coding Conventions compliance. Use when creating public APIs, reusable components, library interfaces, or when the user asks for API design review or Kotlin naming conventions.
Generic, project-abstract task workflow orchestrator. Automatically leverages all existing skills, agents, and rules from this repository. Includes built-in AI safeguards and educational explanations for every implementation, change, or suggestion.
Checks and suggests accessibility improvements for Jetpack Compose and Android Views including TalkBack labels, dynamic text support, and color contrast. Use when creating or modifying UI components, screens, or when the user asks about accessibility.
Use when creating or modifying Flutter UI components, screens, or widgets, or when the user asks about accessibility, screen reader support, VoiceOver, TalkBack, touch targets, color contrast, or WCAG compliance in a Flutter app.
Use when investigating bugs, crashes, or unexpected behavior in a Flutter app. Especially when issues involve Bloc state not emitting, null safety errors, BuildContext after async, GetIt DI failures, method channel mismatches, widget rebuilds, or memory leaks.
Use when reviewing Flutter code for correctness, architecture compliance, design system usage, linting, or testing coverage. Also use before merging a PR or when the user asks for a code review of Dart or Flutter files.
Use when scaffolding a new Flutter feature, setting up the data/domain/view folder structure, creating datasources, DTOs, repositories, or state management classes, or when the user asks how to organize a Flutter project.
Use when assessing feasibility or complexity of a new Flutter feature before implementation. Especially when evaluating API requirements, state management approach, UI component availability, native dependencies, or effort estimation.
Use when implementing a Flutter feature from scratch or completing one in progress. Covers file structure, design system compliance, state management setup, error handling, testing, and build_runner requirements.
Use when Flutter UI has jank, slow scrolling, excessive rebuilds, or memory leaks. Also use when optimizing lists, animations, or complex widget trees, or when the user asks about Flutter rendering performance.
Checks and suggests accessibility improvements for SwiftUI and UIKit code including VoiceOver labels, dynamic type support, and color contrast. Use when creating or modifying UI components, views, or when the user asks about accessibility.
Identifies potential performance bottlenecks in SwiftUI code including expensive view updates, unnecessary redraws, and memory issues. Use when code involves lists, animations, complex UI, or when the user asks about performance optimization.
Analyze SwiftUI view hierarchies and suggest MVVM or other architectural improvements. Use when **reviewing existing SwiftUI code**, creating new SwiftUI components, analyzing view structure, or when the user asks about SwiftUI architecture patterns. Best for code review and refactoring guidance.
Scientific method expert for systematic bug investigation and root cause analysis. Use when users report bugs, crashes, unexpected behavior, or debugging requests. Applies hypothesis-driven investigation, controlled experiments, and rigorous validation across any programming language or platform.