code-review

name	code-review
description	Review a PR diff with focused, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, code changes, or when the user asks for a code review.

Use this template to review a PR diff with focused, actionable feedback.

INPUTS

• PROJECT_CONTEXT
• PR_DIFF
• (optional) PR_DESCRIPTION
• (optional) TICKET_LINKS

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Scan PR_DIFF for correctness, style, security, and performance.
2. Ground comments in PROJECT_CONTEXT (frameworks, languages, databases, messaging systems).
3. Prefer specific inline suggestions with minimal working patches.
4. Flag test gaps and missing docs. Propose concrete test cases.
5. Label severity: Blocker, Major, Minor, Nit.
6. Keep lines ≤80 chars.

OUTPUT FORMAT

Summary

• Scope:
• Impact:
• Risk level:

Positives

• Code quality wins:
• Good patterns:
• Tests/documentation:

Issues by Severity

Blockers

• [file:line] Problem → Why it matters → Fix suggestion

  // patchlet
  

Major

• ...

Minor

• ...

Nits

• ...

Security & Compliance

• Authentication/authorization:
• Input validation/injection prevention:
• Secrets/logging/sensitive data:
• Third-party integrations:
• Data privacy/compliance:

Performance

• Hot paths:
• Database query optimization:
• Caching/TTL:
• Async/concurrency handling:

Testing Gaps

• Unit:
• Integration/e2e:
• Property/fuzz:
• Load/reliability:

Documentation

• Changelog:
• Architecture notes:
• README/code comments:

Inline Review

• [file path]
  • line X: comment
  • line Y: comment

Review Checklist

• Builds/CI green
• Lint/format pass
• Tests updated/added
• Backward compatible
• Feature flagged
• Observability added