| name | review-protocol |
| description | Schedule, record, and summarise review outcomes against previously-issued recommendations via `hai review`. Use when yesterday's plan needs a review question scheduled, when the user reports whether a recommendation helped, or when you need a history summary before reasoning about future confidence. |
| allowed-tools | Bash(hai review *), Read, Write |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
Review Protocol
You don't persist anything yourself. The hai CLI owns all local state mutation. Your job is to call the right subcommand with validated input.
Scope
This skill covers the three hai review subcommands. It is the only skill that writes review events and outcomes — every per-domain skill defers to this one via the follow-up section of its recommendation.
Recommendations themselves are persisted by hai synthesize (the atomic daily-plan commit). This skill does not write recommendations.
Review scheduling
After a synthesis produces a per-domain recommendation with a follow_up.review_event_id, schedule the question:
hai review schedule --recommendation-json /path/to/recommendation.json \
--base-dir <base_dir> \
--db-path <state.db>
Appends to review_events.jsonl and projects into review_event. Idempotent on review_event_id.
<base_dir> is any directory you control; the CLI creates it on first use. Convention in this repo: sibling of the state DB, e.g. ~/.local/share/health_agent_infra/writeback/.
Review outcome recording
When the user reports whether a recommendation helped, construct a ReviewOutcome JSON and call:
hai review record --outcome-json /path/to/outcome.json \
--base-dir <base_dir> \
--db-path <state.db>
Minimum payload shape:
{
"review_event_id": "rev_2026-04-18_user_recovery",
"recommendation_id": "rec_2026-04-17_user_recovery_01",
"user_id": "user",
"domain": "recovery",
"followed_recommendation": true,
"self_reported_improvement": true,
"free_text": "felt good, hit all intervals"
}
The M4 enrichment fields (completed, intensity_delta, duration_minutes, pre_energy_score, post_energy_score, disagreed_firing_ids) are all optional; land NULL when omitted. They can be passed inline in the JSON or via the matching CLI flags, which override the JSON.
Re-link on supersede (D1). If the target recommendation's plan was superseded (because the user re-authored the day via hai synthesize --supersede), the CLI automatically re-links the outcome to the canonical leaf's matching-domain rec. Stderr gets a re-linked from … to … note; stdout JSON shows the effective (re-linked) recommendation id. If the leaf has no matching-domain rec, the CLI refuses with exit code USER_INPUT rather than create an orphan.
Outcomes are append-only; don't call twice for the same event unless deliberately.
Summarising review history
For the reporting skill or for your own context before producing new recommendations:
hai review summary --base-dir <base_dir> \
[--user-id <id>] \
[--domain recovery|running|sleep|strength|stress|nutrition]
Emits counts by outcome category (total, followed_improved, followed_no_change, followed_unknown, not_followed) plus an enriched aggregate block when any M4 field was recorded. This is bookkeeping — no classifier inference.
Invariants
- All state mutation goes through
hai. Never edit JSONL files directly.
recommendation_id identifies the target rec; review_event_id is the idempotency key for events. Outcomes append unconditionally.- Outcomes that would otherwise orphan on a superseded plan are either re-linked (canonical leaf has a matching-domain rec) or refused (it doesn't) — never silently dropped.
