| name | workflow-idea-to-pbi |
| version | 2.2.0 |
| description | [Workflow] Use when activating the Idea to PBI workflow for turning an idea — or a raw product vision/problem — into prioritized PBIs and stories (single-PBI deep mode, or multi-opportunity discovery mode). |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
Quick Summary
Goal: [Workflow] Trigger Idea to PBI workflow in one of two modes. SINGLE-PBI DEEP — capture or review idea/artifact, refine, author the §1-7 Feature Spec draft, generate TDD test specs from the idea, model the domain, plan, derive the PBI and stories, challenge review, DoR gate, mockup, prioritize (idea → draft Feature Spec → specs → from those specs to PBI). MULTI-OPPORTUNITY DISCOVERY — a raw product vision/problem → brainstorm (optionally web-research → deep-research) → RICE opportunity map → user multi-select → a light per-opportunity PBI loop → cross-PBI ranked backlog.
Mode Detection Gate (FIRST — pick the track before any step, then declare it):
| Input | Mode | Track |
|---|
| ONE concrete idea / ticket / brief | Single-PBI Deep | full track incl. spec [mode=draft] + spec [mode=tests] + plan/plan-review/plan-validate → 1 deeply-groomed PBI. SKIP brainstorm/web-research/deep-research. |
| Raw product vision / problem spanning multiple opportunities | Multi-Opportunity Discovery | brainstorm (optionally web-research → deep-research) → RICE map → multi-select → light per-opportunity loop → cross-PBI prioritize. spec [mode=draft] + spec [mode=tests] + plan cycle are deep-mode only — never per opportunity; domain-analysis runs once up front. |
When the input is ambiguous, ask via AskUserQuestion before step 1.
Workflow:
- Detect — classify request scope and target artifacts.
- Execute — apply required steps with evidence-backed actions.
- Verify — confirm constraints, output quality, and completion evidence.
Key Rules:
- MUST ATTENTION keep claims evidence-based (
file:line) with confidence >80% to act.
- MUST ATTENTION keep task tracking updated as each step starts/completes.
- MUST ATTENTION define success criteria before execution and loop until observable verification passes.
- MUST ATTENTION when creating/reviewing specs or tests, name
Business Intent / Invariant Guarded or the protected business intent/invariant and ensure the test would fail if that intent breaks.
- MUST ATTENTION apply the shared SDD Artifact Contract from
shared/sdd-artifact-contract.md in the active skills root; use docs/project-config.json and docs/project-reference/docs-index-reference.md for project-specific conventions.
- [BLOCKING] Tech-agnostic output: idea / PBI / story / problem-statement prose stays tech-agnostic per
docs/project-reference/spec-principles.md §3 — no framework/product/language/design-pattern names; source paths and class names appear ONLY in evidence fields (**Evidence**, [Source:]), frontmatter, and Mermaid.
- MUST ATTENTION treat AI-generated ideas, PBIs, stories, mockups, and TCs as draft/reference until their review or acceptance gate approves them.
- MUST ATTENTION allow any supported AI tool to produce or review artifacts when the shared contract, synced context, and local docs are available.
- NEVER skip mandatory workflow or skill gates.
When to Use
Single-PBI Deep mode:
- PO or BA has a raw idea and needs to shape it into a grooming-ready PBI
- PO is handing off an existing ticket, PRD, or brief to the BA team for refinement
- Single-PBI refinement with stories, test specifications, challenge review, and DoR validation
- Feature needs a structured PBI before entering a sprint
Multi-Opportunity Discovery mode:
- PO/BA has a raw product vision or problem statement that spans several opportunities, and needs a prioritized backlog of multiple PBIs out of it in one pass
- A discovery sprint is needed: structured brainstorm → RICE opportunity map → multi-select → N PBIs → cross-PBI ranking (no implementation)
When NOT to Use
- Just want a (provisional) Feature Spec from an idea, no backlog → use
workflow-idea-to-spec
- Already have canonical Feature Specs and only need the backlog → use
workflow-spec-to-pbi (spec-first entry)
- Implementation-only (PBI already exists and is DoR-ready) → use
workflow-feature or workflow-big-feature
- Bug fixes → use
workflow-bugfix
Key Mechanics
1. Step Selection Gate
After confirming the workflow, present the full step list and let the user deselect irrelevant steps:
- [x] Brainstorm (brainstorm) — DISCOVERY MODE ONLY; RICE opportunity map
- [ ] Market research (web-research) — DISCOVERY MODE, CONDITIONAL
- [ ] Deep research (deep-research) — DISCOVERY MODE, CONDITIONAL; runs only when web-research ran
- [x] Idea capture (idea) — REPEATS per opportunity in discovery mode
- [x] Spec & code discovery (spec-discovery) — investigate related/affected specs + code before authoring
- [ ] Review existing artifact (review-artifact) — CONDITIONAL
- [ ] PO → BA handoff (handoff) — CONDITIONAL
- [x] Refine to PBI (refine) — REPEATS per opportunity in discovery mode
- [x] Refinement rationale review (why-review)
- [x] Feature Spec draft (spec [mode=draft]) — DEEP MODE ONLY; §1-7 Feature Spec (provisional) before §8 tests
- [x] Test specifications (spec [mode=tests]) — DEEP MODE ONLY; idea → draft → specs
- [x] Test-spec rationale review (why-review) — deep mode
- [x] Test specification review (review-artifact --type=spec-tests) — deep mode
- [ ] Domain analysis (domain-analysis) — CONDITIONAL; discovery mode runs it ONCE up front
- [x] Domain rationale review (why-review)
- [x] Implementation plan (plan) — DEEP MODE ONLY
- [x] Plan review (plan-review) — deep mode
- [x] Plan validation (plan-validate) — deep mode
- [x] Plan rationale review (why-review) — deep mode
- [x] PBI review (review-artifact --type=pbi) — from specs to PBI; REPEATS per opportunity
- [x] User stories (story) — REPEATS per opportunity
- [x] Story rationale review (why-review)
- [x] Story review (review-artifact --type=story) — REPEATS per opportunity
- [x] Dev BA PIC challenge (pbi-challenge) — REPEATS per opportunity
- [x] Definition of Ready gate (dor-gate) — REPEATS per opportunity
- [x] PBI HTML mock-up (pbi-mockup) — CONDITIONAL; REPEATS per opportunity
- [x] Backlog prioritization (prioritize) — cross-PBI in discovery mode
- [x] Documentation synchronization (docs-update)
Mark skipped steps as completed immediately. In single-PBI deep mode, deselect brainstorm/web-research/deep-research. In discovery mode, deselect spec [mode=draft], spec [mode=tests], review-artifact --type=spec-tests, and the plan/plan-review/plan-validate cycle (deep-mode-only); run domain-analysis once up front.
1a. Multi-Opportunity Discovery Loop (Discovery Mode core mechanic)
Activated only when the input is a raw product vision/problem spanning multiple opportunities (folded in from the former product-discovery workflow).
- Brainstorm → opportunity map. Run
/brainstorm with Double Diamond (problem framing → opportunity framing → ideation → convergence). Output a RICE-scored opportunity map of 3–8 items to plans/{plan-dir}/brainstorm-opportunity-map.md.
- Multi-select. Present the map via
AskUserQuestion (multiSelect: true): "Which opportunities should we develop into PBIs?"
- Opportunity-map why-review gate (before the loop): challenge whether the top-ranked opportunities are the right problems, whether RICE Reach/Impact are founded or speculative, run a pre-mortem, and name systemic alternatives. FAIL on a high-ranked opportunity → drop it or revisit framing; WARN → document and proceed with user acknowledgment.
- Task decomposition gate. Call
TaskCreate for EVERY task (N opportunities × 8 loop steps = N×8 minimum) BEFORE processing any opportunity — never start the loop without a complete task list.
- Per-opportunity light loop (for EACH selected opportunity — NO
spec [mode=draft], NO spec [mode=tests], NO plan/plan-review/plan-validate; domain-analysis already ran once up front):
/idea → /refine → /review-artifact --type=pbi → /story → /review-artifact --type=story → /pbi-challenge → /dor-gate → /pbi-mockup (skip for backend-only PBIs).
- Scale management. For 6+ selected opportunities, spawn one sub-agent per opportunity (each gets brainstorm context + its task list); the main context runs
/prioritize at the end. Update a session summary table after every 3 opportunities.
- Cross-PBI prioritize. After ALL opportunities are processed, run
/prioritize across all session PBIs (cross-PBI RICE + dependency graph) → sprint-ready ranked backlog, flagging Must/Should/Could-Have.
2. TaskCreate Before Starting
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — Call TaskCreate for every step before beginning any work:
TaskCreate: "Brainstorm → RICE opportunity map" [discovery mode]
TaskCreate: "Market research (web-research)" [discovery mode, conditional]
TaskCreate: "Deep research (deep-research)" [discovery mode, conditional; only when web-research ran]
TaskCreate: "Idea capture"
TaskCreate: "Refine to PBI"
TaskCreate: "Refinement rationale review (why-review after refine)"
TaskCreate: "Feature Spec draft (spec [mode=draft])"
TaskCreate: "Test specifications (spec [mode=tests])"
TaskCreate: "Test-spec rationale review (why-review after spec [mode=tests])"
TaskCreate: "Test specification review (review-artifact --type=spec-tests)"
TaskCreate: "Domain analysis (domain-analysis)" [if domain entities change]
TaskCreate: "Domain rationale review (why-review after domain-analysis)"
TaskCreate: "Implementation plan (plan)"
TaskCreate: "Plan review (plan-review)"
TaskCreate: "Plan validation (plan-validate)"
TaskCreate: "Plan rationale review (why-review after plan-validate)"
TaskCreate: "PBI review (review-artifact --type=pbi)"
TaskCreate: "User stories (story)"
TaskCreate: "Story rationale review (why-review after story)"
TaskCreate: "Story review"
TaskCreate: "Dev BA PIC challenge"
TaskCreate: "Definition of Ready gate"
TaskCreate: "PBI HTML mock-up" [if UI]
TaskCreate: "Prioritize"
TaskCreate: "Documentation synchronization (docs-update)"
TaskCreate: "Session summary (watzup)"
One task per step. Mark each completed immediately when done — never batch.
3. Why-Review Gates (Purpose-Specific, Repeated)
This is the adversarial design rationale check. Purpose: validate the WHY of each artifact before investing in the next.
The workflow contains repeated /why-review gates after the non-review artifact steps. Use purpose-specific labels in sequence: refinement rationale (after refine), test-spec rationale (after spec [mode=tests]), domain rationale (after domain-analysis), plan rationale (after plan-validate), and story rationale (after story). Do not deduplicate them.
The standalone gate after review-artifact --type=pbi is intentionally omitted: review-artifact --type=pbi (like every review skill) already self-invokes /why-review --validate-findings as an internal Findings Validation Gate, so a separate why-review step right after it would be duplicate work.
Challenge prompts:
- Is this the right solution to the stated problem? What was rejected and why?
- Are the acceptance criteria constraints justified? What happens if any constraint is removed?
- Pre-mortem: if this PBI ships and fails in 3 months, what breaks?
- Are there simpler alternatives not yet considered?
- Does the scope align with the stated business value?
Output: Why-Review checklist with PASS / WARN / FAIL.
| Result | Action |
|---|
| PASS | Proceed to the next artifact step |
| WARN | Document risk, proceed with user acknowledgment |
| FAIL | Revise PBI in /refine before continuing |
4. TDD-Spec Gate (After refine + spec [mode=draft], Before the PBI is drafted)
Author the canonical §1-7 Feature Spec with /spec [mode=draft] (idea-sourced, provisional, §8 Evidence: TBD), then generate and review §8 test specifications right after refine — BEFORE the PBI is drafted — so the PBI, stories, and plan are derived FROM the draft Feature Spec + its test specs (idea → draft Feature Spec → specs → from those specs to PBI).
AI-generated TC drafts are reference-only until /review-artifact --type=spec-tests, /pbi-challenge, and /dor-gate accept them for delivery planning.
Output requirements:
- Map material acceptance criteria and user stories to TC IDs
- Route planned TC IDs to Feature doc Section 8 through
/spec [mode=tests]; /docs-update later verifies feature docs and §8 TC ↔ integration test code sync.
- Cover happy path, validation failure, authorization/permission, and important edge cases where applicable
- Run
/review-artifact --type=spec-tests before /pbi-challenge
5. PBI Output Format
Each PBI artifact must contain:
| Section | Content |
|---|
| Title | Clear, actionable |
| Problem Statement | Why this needs to exist |
| Hypothesis | If we build X, users will Y, which drives Z |
| Acceptance Criteria | GIVEN / WHEN / THEN format |
| RICE Score | Reach × Impact × Confidence / Effort |
| User Stories | Who / What / Why |
| Test Specs | TC IDs mapped to acceptance criteria |
| DoR Status | PASS / WARN / FAIL |
| Mockup | HTML mock-up based on project reference design docs (if UI) |
6. Artifact Locations
| Step | Output Path |
|---|
| Idea | team-artifacts/ideas/{YYMMDD}-{role}-idea-{slug}.md |
| PBI | team-artifacts/pbis/{YYMMDD}-pbi-{slug}.md |
| Stories | Added to PBI artifact |
| Test specs | Feature doc Section 8 (canonical TC registry) |
| DoR result | Added to PBI artifact |
| Mockup | HTML mock-up file saved beside PBI artifact |
| Prioritization | team-artifacts/backlog/{YYMMDD}-backlog-update.md |
| Docs sync | plans/reports/docs-update-{YYMMDD}-{HHMM}.md |
These roots intentionally match the child skills (idea, refine, story, pbi-mockup, prioritize, docs-update). If artifact roots become configurable later, update this workflow and all child skills in the same change.
Write output IMMEDIATELY after each step — never batch across steps.
7. Conditional Skip Rules
| Step | Skip When |
|---|
/brainstorm | Single-PBI deep mode (one concrete idea/ticket) |
/web-research | Single-PBI deep mode, internal tool, or well-understood domain |
/deep-research | Single-PBI deep mode, or whenever web-research is skipped (runs only when it ran) |
/review-artifact | No existing artifact — raw idea input |
/spec [mode=draft] | Discovery mode (deep-mode only — never per opportunity) |
/spec [mode=tests], /review-artifact --type=spec-tests | Discovery mode (deep-mode only — never per opportunity) |
/domain-analysis | Idea introduces no new/changed domain entities; in discovery mode run ONCE up front |
/plan, /plan-review, /plan-validate | Discovery mode (deep-mode only — never per opportunity) |
/pbi-mockup | Backend-only PBI — no UI changes |
8. Near-Final Documentation Synchronization
Run /docs-update after /prioritize and before /workflow-end.
Purpose:
- Sync refined PBI/story outputs into business feature docs where applicable.
- Sync feature doc Section 8 test specifications and
docs/specs/ dashboards after /review-artifact --type=spec-tests.
- Verify specs, feature docs, and TDD/spec docs do not drift before workflow closure.
- Record skipped sub-phases explicitly when no impacted docs exist.
IMPORTANT MANDATORY Steps: /brainstorm -> /web-research -> /deep-research -> /idea -> /spec-discovery -> /review-artifact -> /refine -> /why-review -> /spec [mode=draft] -> /spec [mode=tests] -> /why-review -> /review-artifact --type=spec-tests -> /spec-clarify -> /domain-analysis -> /why-review -> /plan -> /plan-review -> /plan-validate -> /why-review -> /review-artifact --type=pbi -> /story -> /why-review -> /review-artifact --type=story -> /pbi-challenge -> /dor-gate -> /pbi-mockup -> /prioritize -> /docs-update -> /workflow-end -> /watzup
Mode gating of the canonical sequence above — Single-PBI deep mode: skip /brainstorm + /web-research + /deep-research; run the full deep track (one PBI). Discovery mode: run /brainstorm (optionally /web-research → /deep-research), skip /spec [mode=draft], /spec [mode=tests], /review-artifact --type=spec-tests, /spec-clarify, /plan, /plan-review, /plan-validate; loop /idea→/refine→/review-artifact --type=pbi→/story→/review-artifact --type=story→/pbi-challenge→/dor-gate→/pbi-mockup per selected opportunity, then /prioritize cross-PBI.
[BLOCKING] Each step MUST ATTENTION invoke its Skill tool — marking a task completed without skill invocation is a workflow violation. NEVER batch-complete validation gates.
Activate the workflow-idea-to-pbi workflow. Run /start-workflow workflow-idea-to-pbi with the user's prompt as context.
Steps:
/brainstorm → /web-research → /deep-research → /idea → /spec-discovery → /review-artifact → /refine → /why-review → /spec [mode=draft] → /spec [mode=tests] → /why-review → /review-artifact --type=spec-tests → /spec-clarify → /domain-analysis → /why-review → /plan → /plan-review → /plan-validate → /why-review → /review-artifact --type=pbi → /story → /why-review → /review-artifact --type=story → /pbi-challenge → /dor-gate → /pbi-mockup → /prioritize → /docs-update → /workflow-end → /watzup
Conditional / mode-gated steps:
/brainstorm, /web-research, /deep-research — DISCOVERY MODE only; skip in single-PBI deep mode (/deep-research runs only when /web-research ran)/spec [mode=draft], /spec [mode=tests], /review-artifact --type=spec-tests, /plan, /plan-review, /plan-validate — DEEP MODE only; never run per opportunity in discovery mode/review-artifact — skip if no existing artifact/ticket/PRD; proceed straight to /refine/domain-analysis — skip if the idea introduces no new/changed domain entities; in discovery mode run once up front/pbi-mockup — skip if PBI is backend-only (no UI changes)
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Re-read files after context changes. Context compaction, resume, or long-running work can make memory stale; verify current files before acting.
Verify generated content against source evidence. AI hallucinates APIs, names, claims, and document facts. Check the relevant source before documenting or referencing.
Check downstream references before deleting or renaming. Removing an artifact can stale docs, generated mirrors, configs, and callers; map references first.
Trace the full impact chain after edits. Changing a definition can miss derived outputs and consumers. Follow the affected chain before declaring done.
Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. One green check is not all green checks; validate every output surface the change can affect.
Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing a constant, limit, flag, wording, or pattern, read nearby context and history.
Surface ambiguity before acting — don't pick silently. Multiple valid interpretations require an explicit question or stated assumption with risk.
Keep shared guidance role-relevant. Universal guidance must help every receiving skill or agent; code-specific obligations belong only in code-specific protocols.
Nested Task Expansion Contract — For workflow-step invocation, the [Workflow] ... row is only a parent container; the child skill still creates visible phase tasks.
- Call
TaskList first. If a matching active parent workflow row exists, set nested=true and record parentTaskId; otherwise run standalone.
- Create one task per declared phase before phase work. When nested, prefix subjects
[N.M] $skill-name — phase.
- When nested, link the parent with
TaskUpdate(parentTaskId, addBlockedBy: [childIds]).
- Orchestrators must pre-expand a child skill's phase list and link the workflow row before invoking that child skill or sub-agent.
- Mark exactly one child
in_progress before work and completed immediately after evidence is written.
- Complete the parent only after all child tasks are completed or explicitly cancelled with reason.
Blocked until: TaskList done, child phases created, parent linked when nested, first child marked in_progress.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act.
Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
Incremental Result Persistence — MANDATORY for all sub-agents or heavy inline steps processing >3 files.
- Before starting: Create report file
plans/reports/{skill}-{date}-{slug}.md
- After each file/section reviewed: Append findings to report immediately — never hold in memory
- Return to main agent: Summary only (per SYNC:subagent-return-contract) with
Full report: path
- Main agent: Reads report file only when resolving specific blockers
Why: Context cutoff mid-execution loses ALL in-memory findings. Each disk write survives compaction. Partial results are better than no results.
Report naming: plans/reports/{skill-name}-{YYMMDD}-{HHmm}-{slug}.md
Sub-Agent Return Contract — When this skill spawns a sub-agent, the sub-agent MUST return ONLY this structure. Main agent reads only this summary — NEVER requests full sub-agent output inline.
## Sub-Agent Result: [skill-name]
Status: ✅ PASS | ⚠️ PARTIAL | ❌ FAIL
Confidence: [0-100]%
### Findings (Critical/High only — max 10 bullets)
- [severity] [file:line] [finding]
### Actions Taken
- [file changed] [what changed]
### Blockers (if any)
- [blocker description]
Full report: plans/reports/[skill-name]-[date]-[slug].md
Main agent reads Full report file ONLY when: (a) resolving a specific blocker, or (b) building a fix plan.
Sub-agent writes full report incrementally (per SYNC:incremental-persistence) — not held in memory.
Context budget — the return payload is a SUMMARY, not a transcript: ≤10 finding bullets, no raw file contents / full diffs / verbatim logs inline, no re-pasted source. Everything beyond the summary lives in the Full report on disk. A sub-agent that would exceed the summary shape MUST write the detail to its report and return only the pointer — the orchestrator's context is the scarce resource the whole map-reduce protects.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical + sequential thinking — every claim needs appropriate traced evidence (file:line for repo/code claims; source URL or artifact section for research, product, content, and docs claims); confidence >80% to act, <60% DO NOT recommend. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact, admit uncertainty freely, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references before deleting or renaming, verify all affected outputs, re-read files after context loss, and surface ambiguity before acting.
- MANDATORY Parent workflow rows do not replace child phase tracking; expand phases and link the parent when nested.
- MANDATORY Orchestrators pre-expand child skill phases before invocation; use
[N.M] $skill-name — phase prefixes and one-in_progress discipline.
Closing Reminders
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries; each line is a signpost to its canonical body above):
-
AI Mistake Prevention: verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references, verify all affected outputs, re-read after context loss, surface ambiguity.
-
Nested Task Creation: Expand child phases, link parent when nested, one in_progress at a time.
-
Critical Thinking: Traced file:line proof per claim, confidence >80% to act.
-
Incremental Persistence: Write findings to plans/reports/ per file — never hold in memory.
-
Sub-Agent Return Contract: Sub-agents return summary only; full detail to report on disk.
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting — one task per step
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION run all five purpose-specific why-review gates: after refine, after spec [mode=tests], after domain-analysis, after plan-validate, and after story; FAIL blocks the next artifact step, WARN requires user acknowledgment
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION spec [mode=draft] authors the §1-7 Feature Spec (provisional) right after refine, then spec [mode=tests] and review-artifact --type=spec-tests run before the PBI is drafted (idea → draft Feature Spec → specs → from those specs to PBI); both spec [mode=draft] and spec [mode=tests] are SINGLE-PBI DEEP MODE ONLY (never per opportunity in discovery mode)
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION pbi-challenge must be run by a reviewer different from the drafter
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION dor-gate must pass (PASS or WARN) before pbi-mockup is finalized
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION write each artifact immediately — never batch output across steps
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION docs-update runs after prioritize and before workflow-end to sync specs, feature docs, and TDD/spec dashboards
-
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final watzup summary: PBI title, DoR result, any blocking items, recommended next step
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.
[IMPORTANT] Analyze how big the task is and break it into many small todo tasks systematically before starting — this is very important.
