Menu
Generate professional research reports (survey, proposal, technical).
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
| name | report |
| description | Generate professional research reports (survey, proposal, technical). |
| always | false |
When the user asks to compile research findings into a formal report.
Sections: Introduction, Background, Taxonomy, Comparison Table, Discussion, References Format: Academic (LaTeX-ready markdown)
Sections: Abstract, Problem Statement, Related Work, Proposed Method, Timeline, References Format: Grant-style
Sections: Abstract, Method, Experiments, Results, Discussion, Conclusion Format: Technical
Sections: Key Findings, Recommendations, Next Steps Format: 1-2 pages, bullet-point heavy
report_{type}_{topic}_{date}.mdreport_{type}_{topic}_{date}.texUse inline citations: (Author et al., Year) or [arXiv:XXXX.XXXXX] Include full BibTeX at the end.
Search HuggingFace Hub for datasets by keyword. Use when the user wants to find training data, benchmarks, or evaluation datasets for ML/NLP/CV research.
Fetch the FULL TEXT of an arXiv paper (all sections — introduction, method, results, conclusion). Use when you need to read beyond the abstract into the paper's actual content. Only works for arXiv papers. For metadata/abstract only, use paper-read. For local PDFs, use paper-read-pdf.
Two-layer memory system with grep-based recall for research sessions.
Track specific scientific claims across the literature over time — who made it, who replicated it, who challenged it, whether it still stands. Use when verifying a key assumption before building on it, or when checking whether a published result has been updated or superseded.
Scan papers for conflicting empirical claims, methodological disagreements, or opposing conclusions on the same topic. Use when writing discussion sections, evaluating conflicting results, or checking if a claim is contested before building on it.
Synthesize findings across multiple papers into a coherent narrative, structured comparison table, or temporal evolution. Use after collecting papers via survey or paper-search. Goes beyond summarizing individual papers to produce insights that only emerge when reading across the corpus as a whole.