Menu
First-principles reasoning: refuse inherited assumptions; derive from base truths.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Canonical b00t reviewer capability — adversarial multi-framework code/datum review. Shared across all harnesses (Claude Code, opencode, Hermes, b00t-cli). Loaded via: b00t learn reviewer, or by harness-specific role supplements.
Remove AI-generated artifacts from code. Three-phase certainty-graded cleanup. Use after any AI implementation session or before PR creation.
8-phase agile workflow — strategy→ideate→brainstorm→plan→work→review→compound→pulse. State machine with FOL-guarded transitions, gh-issues backlog, executable just harness. Inspired by everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin.
Australian crypto tax treatment per ATO guidance QC 53725. Crypto assets are CGT assets under ITAA 1997 s 108-5. Each disposal triggers CGT event A1. Covers personal-use exception, trading stock test, and the 50% CGT discount.
Australian R&D Tax Incentive (RDTI) — ITAA 1997 Division 355. Covers eligibility criteria for core and supporting R&D activities, registration with AusIndustry/IP Australia, expenditure categories, offset rates, and the company size threshold test.
Evidence graph construction for tax audit trails. Each Satisfies check emits EvidenceNode structs with Blake3 content hashes. Evidence chains are tamper-evident and link legislative citations to factual findings.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
| name | first-principles |
| type | skill |
| hint | Decompose to atoms; rebuild from base truths; ignore analogy and precedent |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| tags | ["transferable","first-principles","reasoning","decompose","atoms","assumptions","base-truth"] |
| tier | ch0nky |
| complexity | 5 |
| description | First-principles reasoning: refuse inherited assumptions; derive from base truths. |
First-principles reasoning means refusing inherited assumptions and deriving conclusions from base truths. Step 1: state what you believe to be true about the problem. Step 2: for each belief, ask "is this a fact, or did I inherit it from convention?" Step 3: discard the inherited beliefs and rebuild from what remains.
Elon Musk's classic example: "batteries are expensive" → why? → materials → materials are cheap → rethink assembly. In software: "we need a database" → why? → persistent state → what's the simplest persistent state? The key test: "would this design make sense to someone who had never seen this domain before?"
Apply first-principles thinking to high-stakes decisions where inherited assumptions may be hiding better solutions. It is expensive — do not use it for every micro-choice. Use it when analogy reasoning ("we do it this way because that's how X does it") would lead to a suboptimal outcome.
