build-unplanned

name	build-unplanned
description	Build a feature from description with worktree isolation and TDD. Usage /groundwork:build-unplanned "Add user login"
argument-hint	[feature-description]
allowed-tools	["Read","Edit","Write","Bash","Glob","Grep","Task","Skill","AskUserQuestion"]
disable-model-invocation	true

Build Unplanned Feature

Thin orchestrator for ad-hoc feature development without existing task definitions. Delegates to plan-task (blurb mode), implement-task, and validate.

Token Discipline

This skill orchestrates long multi-agent workflows. Every turn re-reads the full context window, so unnecessary turns are expensive.

1. No narration turns. Do not output text-only turns like "Let me understand your feature" or "Now I'll dispatch implementation." Combine text with a tool call in the same turn, or skip the text entirely.
2. Batch tool calls. When multiple tool calls are independent, issue them all in one turn.
3. No waiting updates. Do not output "Waiting for results..." turns. Wait silently until results arrive.
4. Keep context lean. Do not read file contents you won't use directly. Pass file paths to subagents and let them read in their own context windows.

Pre-flight: Model Recommendation

Your current effort level is {{effort_level}}.

Skip this step silently if effort is high, xhigh, or max (the scale is low < medium < high < xhigh < max, so xhigh and max are already above high) AND you are Sonnet or Opus. If effort is low or medium (i.e. below high), you MUST show the recommendation prompt — regardless of model. If you are not Sonnet or Opus, you MUST show the recommendation prompt — regardless of effort level.

Otherwise → use AskUserQuestion:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Feature development benefits from consistent multi-domain reasoning.\n\nRecommended: Sonnet or Opus at high effort.\n\nTo switch: cancel, run `/effort high` (and `/model sonnet` if on Haiku), then re-invoke.",
    "header": "Effort check",
    "options": [
      { "label": "Continue anyway" },
      { "label": "Cancel — I'll switch first" }
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

If the user selects "Cancel — I'll switch first": output the switching commands and stop. Do not proceed with the skill.

Step 0: Resolve Project Context

1. Monorepo check: Does .groundwork.yml exist at the repo root?
   • If yes → Is {{project_name}} non-empty?
     • If empty → Invoke Skill(skill="groundwork:select-project") to select a project, then restart this skill.
     • If set → Project is {{project_name}}, specs at {{specs_dir}}/.
   • If no → Continue (single-project repo).
2. CWD mismatch check (monorepo only):
   • Skip if not in monorepo mode or if the project was just selected above.
   • If CWD is the repo root → fine, proceed.
   • Check which project's path CWD falls inside (compare against all projects in .groundwork.yml).
   • If CWD is inside the selected project's path → fine, proceed.
   • If CWD is inside a different project's path → warn via AskUserQuestion:

     "You're working from <cwd> (inside [cwd-project]), but the selected Groundwork project is [selected-project] ([selected-project-path]/). What would you like to do?"

     • "Switch to [cwd-project]"
     • "Stay with [selected-project]" If the user switches, invoke Skill(skill="groundwork:select-project").

   • If CWD doesn't match any project → proceed without warning (shared directory).
3. Proceed with the resolved project context.

Step 1: Parse Feature Description

• Argument provided: Use the argument text as the feature blurb.
• No argument: Use AskUserQuestion to ask:

  "What feature would you like to build? Describe it briefly."

Step 2: Plan → plan-task

Call Skill(skill="groundwork:plan-task") with the blurb from Step 1 in the conversation context. Do NOT pass a task_id — this triggers blurb/feature mode in plan-task, which will:

• Load existing specs (if any)
• Call understanding-feature-requests for requirement clarification
• Generate a FEATURE-<slug> identifier
• Spawn a Plan agent and persist the plan

Parse the output:

• RESULT: PLANNED | plan_file_path=<path> | identifier=<id> | branch_prefix=<prefix> → Save plan_file_path, identifier, branch_prefix. Proceed.
• RESULT: FAILURE | ... → Report the failure to the user and stop.

Step 2.5: Confirm Start

Use AskUserQuestion:

"[identifier] — plan ready. Proceed to implementation?"

• Option 1: "Yes, begin implementation"
• Option 2: "Stop here — I'll review the plan first"

If "Stop here": Print the plan file path and stop:

Plan saved to: <plan_file_path>

To resume implementation later:
/groundwork:implement-task <plan_file_path>

Step 3: Implement → implement-task

Call Skill(skill="groundwork:implement-task") with plan_file_path in the conversation context. Do NOT pass a task_id.

Parse the output:

• RESULT: IMPLEMENTED | worktree_path=<path> | branch=<branch> | base_branch=<bb> → Save values. Proceed.
• RESULT: FAILURE | ... → Report failure to the user and stop.

Step 3.5: Optional Context Clear Pause

Use AskUserQuestion:

"Implementation complete for [identifier]. Validation runs 9 reviewer agents next and can compound context. Clear context before validation?"

• Option 1: "Continue to validation now"
• Option 2: "Stop here — I'll clear and resume manually"

If "Continue to validation now": Proceed to Step 4.

If "Stop here": Print resume instructions and STOP:

## Paused before validation

Implementation is committed in:
- **Worktree:** `<worktree_path>`
- **Branch:** `<branch>`
- **Base branch:** `<base_branch>`

To resume validation in a clean context:

1. Run `/clear` to clear Claude Code context
2. `cd <worktree_path>`
3. Run `/groundwork:validate`

After validation passes, merge manually from the project root:

    cd <project_root>
    git checkout <base_branch>
    git merge --no-ff <branch>
    git worktree remove <worktree_path>
    git branch -d <branch>

Step 4: Validate

1. cd into the worktree path from Step 3
2. Call: Skill(skill="groundwork:validate")
3. The validate skill will run 9 verification agents in parallel and fix issues autonomously.

After validate completes:

• All agents approved → Proceed to Step 5
• Validation failed → Report failure and worktree location for investigation, stop
• Stuck on recurring issue → Report the stuck finding and stop

Step 5: Merge Decision

From the project root (NOT the worktree), handle merge:

Use AskUserQuestion to ask:

"Implementation and validation complete for [identifier]. Would you like me to merge this into [base-branch] now?"

• Option 1: "Yes, merge now"
• Option 2: "No, I'll merge manually later"

Wait for user response before proceeding.

If merging:

1. Ensure you are in the project root (cd out of worktree if needed)
2. Checkout base branch: git checkout <base-branch>
3. Merge: git merge --no-ff <branch> -m "Merge <branch>: [Feature Title]"
4. If success: Remove worktree and delete branch:

   git worktree remove .worktrees/<identifier>
   git branch -d <branch>
   

5. If conflicts: Report conflicts and keep worktree for manual resolution

If not merging or conflicts occurred:

## Implementation Complete in Worktree

**Location:** .worktrees/<identifier>
**Branch:** feature/<identifier>

When ready to merge:
```bash
git checkout [base-branch]
git merge --no-ff <branch>
git worktree remove .worktrees/<identifier>
git branch -d <branch>

To continue working:

cd .worktrees/<identifier>

## Step 6: Report

Output implementation summary:

```markdown
## Feature Complete: [identifier]

**What was done:**
- [summary]

**Validation:** Passed ([N] iteration(s))

**Worktree status:** [Merged to <branch> | Pending at .worktrees/<identifier>]

Output the final result line:

RESULT: SUCCESS | [one-line summary]

---

Reference

Branch Naming

This skill uses feature/ prefix (not task/) to distinguish ad-hoc features from planned tasks:

• Planned tasks: task/TASK-NNN
• Ad-hoc features: feature/FEATURE-<slug>

Standalone Usage

This skill is designed for standalone use when:

• No product specs exist
• No task definitions exist
• Quick prototyping is needed
• Ad-hoc feature requests come in

For planned work with existing specs, use groundwork:work-on instead.