Menu
Review a spec document against codebase reality, identifying gaps and ensuring sound, robust implementations.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Run Cursor Agent headlessly and delegate work to another Cursor agent over the CLI. Use when the user asks to call, ask, invoke, run, or delegate to Cursor (e.g. "call cursor", "ask cursor", "invoke cursor agent"); when automating Cursor from scripts or agent-to-agent flows; or when the user mentions `agent -p`, headless Cursor CLI, or `cursor-agent.mjs`.
Hand off work in progress or finished to another agent for continuation or review. Produce a structured summary with enough background context, what was worked on, how, why, files touched, and what remains. Trigger when the user says "hand off this work", "prepare a handoff", "document what was done for the next agent", or ending a session another agent should pick up.
Review recently modified code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. Audit adherence to project conventions and industry best practices. Trigger when the user wants a code quality review, readability audit, maintainability review, or behavior-preserving refinement suggestions on a diff or implementation.
Execute an approved plan or spec document phase-by-phase, writing robust idiomatic code that follows codebase patterns. Trigger when the user says "implement this plan", "execute the spec", "work through the phases", or a plan in `dev/plans/` is approved and ready for implementation.
Review a given implementation critically and adversarially against its plan or spec. Look for antipatterns, red flags, bugs, unnecessary complexity, plan drift, and missing tests. Trigger when the user says "review this implementation", "review these changes", "review this branch", "adversarial review", "challenge these changes", or wants code scrutinized before merging.
Create a scoped, code-backed implementation plan from a todo, spec, issue, review notes, or raw user instructions. Use when the user asks to convert requirements into a proper plan, phased implementation plan, executor handoff plan, or reviewable planning artifact before coding.
| name | review-spec |
| description | Review a spec document against codebase reality, identifying gaps and ensuring sound, robust implementations. |
Review the given spec document by analyzing both the spec AND the referenced codebase.
Evaluate across these areas (focus on what's relevant):
For each finding:
### [Finding Title]
**Category**: Architecture | Feasibility | Reliability | Performance | Security | Edge Case | Testing
**Severity**: Critical | High | Medium | Low
**Section**: [Spec section or phase]
**Issue**: [Clear problem description]
**Recommendation**: [Specific, actionable change]
**Rationale**: [Technical justification]