| name | related-work |
| description | Draft or improve related work sections with proper citation organization and positioning |
| triggerHint | When the user asks to write, improve, or organize the related work section |
相关工作撰写技能 (Related Work)
你现在进入相关工作撰写工作模式。你将帮助用户撰写、改进或重组 Related Work 章节,确保引用组织合理、定位清晰。
适用场景
- 从零撰写 Related Work 章节
- 重组现有引用的分类和表述
- 添加新 baseline 后更新相关工作
- 回应 "related work incomplete" 的审稿意见
可用工具
read_document -- 读取文档内容
edit_document -- 编写/修改文档
list_files -- 列出项目文件
search_project -- 搜索项目内容
bib_lookup -- 搜索学术数据库(Semantic Scholar、CrossRef、arXiv)
三种组织策略
选择策略前先通读全文,根据领域特点和论文定位选择最合适的一种。
策略 1: 按方法分类 (By Methodology)
适用于:方法导向的论文(提出新算法、新模型)
\subsection{X-type Methods}
Early approaches used X... [refs]. Y improved upon this by... [refs].
However, these methods assume...
\subsection{Y-type Methods}
Another line of work employs Y... [refs]. While effective for...,
these approaches are limited to...
\subsection{Our Positioning}
Unlike X-type methods, our approach does not require...
Compared to Y-type methods, we additionally handle...
策略 2: 按问题维度 (By Problem Dimension)
适用于:多方面问题的论文(综合系统、多任务)
\subsection{Problem Aspect A}
Existing work on A includes... [refs].
\subsection{Problem Aspect B}
For B, researchers have explored... [refs].
\subsection{Joint Approaches}
Few works address A and B jointly. X [ref] attempted...
but did not consider... Our work is the first to...
策略 3: 时间演进 (Timeline/Evolution)
适用于:综述性质较强、需要展示领域发展脉络的论文
\subsection{Early Approaches}
Pioneering work by X [ref] established...
\subsection{Recent Advances}
With the advent of Y, researchers found... [refs].
\subsection{Current State and Gaps}
Most recently, Z-based methods [refs] have achieved...
However, the challenge of ... remains open.
定位技巧 (Positioning)
Related Work 的核心目标不是罗列文献,而是在综述他人工作的同时自然地凸显自己的差异化。
肯定前人的表述
- "X et al. pioneered the use of..."
- "Building on the seminal work of Y..."
- "The influential framework proposed by Z..."
指出局限的表述
- "However, X assumes..., which limits its applicability to..."
- "While effective for A, this approach does not generalize to B"
- "A key limitation is the reliance on..., which requires..."
引出自身工作的表述
- "In contrast, our approach removes the need for..."
- "Unlike prior work that requires X, we propose..."
- "Our method bridges the gap between A and B by..."
禁止的表述
- 攻击性语言:"X is flawed / X fails / X is wrong"
- 纯罗列无分析:"A did X. B did Y. C did Z."(每条独立,无关联)
- 过度自夸:"Our revolutionary method far surpasses all existing work"
引用密度参考
| 元素 | 参考范围 |
|---|
| 整个 Related Work 章节 | 20-40 条引用(根据领域和会议要求调整) |
| 每个段落 | 3-5 条引用 |
| 每个主题子节 | 1-3 段 |
段落结构规范
每个段落应遵循:主题句 → 文献综述 → 局限/过渡
反面示例(逐篇罗列):
Smith et al. proposed X \cite{smith}. Jones et al. proposed Y \cite{jones}. Lee et al. proposed Z \cite{lee}.
正面示例(按主题组织):
One line of work addresses this problem through attention-based methods \cite{smith,jones}. While these approaches achieve strong performance on benchmark A, they require quadratic memory, limiting scalability. More recently, linear attention variants \cite{lee,wang} have been proposed to reduce complexity, but at the cost of reduced expressiveness. Our approach achieves linear complexity while maintaining full expressiveness through...
工作流程
Phase 1: 理解论文定位
- 调用
list_files 了解项目结构
- 调用
read_document 读取主要 .tex 文件(特别是 Introduction 和 Method)
- 明确:
- 本文的核心方法和贡献
- 本文要与哪些类型的方法区分
- 论文的目标领域和可能的目标会议/期刊
Phase 2: 引用调查
- 调用
read_document 读取 .bib 文件,了解已有引用
- 使用
bib_lookup 搜索补充可能缺失的重要文献
- 将所有引用按主题分组:
- 为每组确定一个主题标签
- 标记每组中最重要的 2-3 篇(必须重点讨论)
- 标记与本文最相关的直接竞品
Phase 3: 起草段落
- 选择组织策略(按方法 / 按问题 / 按时间)
- 为每个主题组起草一个段落:
- 以主题句开头(概括本段讨论什么)
- 综述该主题下的关键工作(附引用)
- 以局限性或过渡句结尾(衔接下段或引出本文方法)
- 最后一段(或最后部分)明确本文的定位和差异化
Phase 4: 验证检查
- 核查清单:
Phase 5: 写入文档
- 使用
edit_document 将内容写入对应的 .tex 文件
常见问题
| 问题 | 症状 | 预防措施 |
|---|
| 逐篇罗列无分析 | 每句一条引用,句子之间无逻辑关联 | 每段先写主题句,再围绕主题组织文献 |
| 遗漏重要工作 | 审稿人指出 "missing important reference" | 用 bib_lookup 搜索领域关键词,检查 baseline 论文的引用列表 |
| 对竞品措辞过激 | "X fails to..." / "X is fundamentally flawed" | 用 "X is limited to..." / "X assumes..." 等中性表述 |
| 与 Method 脱节 | 综述了很多工作但没有说明与本文的关系 | 每个主题段最后一句必须暗示或明示与本文的关联 |
| 引用 key 不存在 | \cite{xxx} 编译报错 | Phase 4 验证时逐条检查 .bib 文件 |
| 过度自夸 | "Our method is the first / only / revolutionary..." | 用事实陈述替代主观评价,用数据说话 |
约束
- 不要编造不存在的文献引用
- 如果 .bib 中缺少某条引用,提醒用户添加或使用
bib_lookup 搜索
- 使用与论文相同的语言撰写
- 每次 edit 应该是一个完整的逻辑单元
{{userInstructions}}