Skip to main content Skills Marketplace Découvrez et explorez les compétences IA créées par la communauté.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Afficher les détails du prompt Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
npx skills add https://github.com/ForceInjection/domain-driven-design-skills --skill competitive-analysisLa commande reste sur une seule ligne. Faites défiler horizontalement pour la vérifier avant de la copier.
Vous préférez une copie locale ? Téléchargez les fichiers actuellement disponibles dans SkillsMP.
Télécharger Zip Téléchargement... Plus depuis ce dépôt Conduct deep academic research for philosophy, neuroscience, cognitive science, and theoretical computer science (computability, complexity, AI theory, logic). Use when user asks to: research academic topics, find scholarly papers, conduct literature reviews, analyze citations, synthesize research findings, explore philosophical arguments, investigate consciousness/cognition, study computability/decidability/Turing machines, or analyze academic debates. Triggers on: 'research papers', 'literature review', 'academic sources', 'scholarly articles', 'philosophy of mind', 'computability theory', 'neuroscience studies', 'find papers on', 'what does the research say'.
Create clear action plans with steps, success criteria, and risk awareness. Use before implementing features, making changes, starting projects, or anytime you need a roadmap to success. Triggers on "plan this", "how should we approach", "what's the strategy", "steps to complete", or when facing complex multi-step work.
Add keyboard navigation to a feature using CommandRegistryService. Use when implementing keyboard shortcuts, vim-style navigation, or hotkeys for a page or component.
Métiers associés SOC
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Explorateur de fichiers
2 fichiers name competitive-analysis title Competitive Analysis & Intelligence description Strategic competitive analysis framework for evaluating skills, commands, agents, and product features against external repositories and competitors domain product subdomain product-team-general difficulty intermediate time-saved 70% faster competitive analysis, 50% more comprehensive gap coverage frequency Monthly for strategic planning, quarterly for market reviews use-cases ["Competitive scorecard generation with weighted dimensions","Feature gap analysis and opportunity identification","Competitive advantage documentation","Adoption prioritization using impact/effort frameworks","Strategic positioning assessment"] related-agents ["cs-product-strategist","cs-product-manager","cs-business-analyst"] related-skills [] related-commands [] orchestrated-by [] dependencies {"scripts":[],"references":[],"assets":[]} compatibility {"python-version":"3.8+","platforms":["macos","linux","windows"]} tech-stack ["Python 3.8+","Markdown"] examples [{"title":"Competitive Scorecard","input":"Analyze competitor repository against our skills","output":"Visual scorecard with ratings and recommendations"}] stats {"downloads":0,"stars":0,"rating":0,"reviews":0} version v1.1.0 author Claude Skills Library contributors [] created "2025-11-27T00:00:00.000Z" updated "2025-11-27T00:00:00.000Z" license MIT tags ["competitive-intelligence","gap-analysis","strategic-planning","scorecard","prioritization","product"] featured false verified true
Competitive Analysis Skill
Overview
The Competitive Analysis skill provides a structured framework for comparing your skills, commands, agents, and features against competitors. It enables systematic evaluation using weighted scoring dimensions and generates actionable insights for product strategy.
Core Capabilities
Scorecard Generation - Multi-dimensional comparison with weighted scoring for visual scorecardsGap Analysis - Identify what competitors have that you don't with prioritized gap listsAdvantage Identification - Document your competitive strengths in differentiation matricesAdoption Prioritization - Rank improvements by impact and effort for action roadmaps
When to Use This Skill
Evaluating new market entrants or competitor updates
Planning product roadmap priorities
Identifying feature gaps before releases
Documenting competitive differentiation for stakeholders
Strategic planning sessions
Quick Start
python scripts/competitive_analyzer.py --competitor-path ./competitor-code --our-path ./
python scripts/gap_analyzer.py --competitor-path ./competitor
python scripts/scorecard_generator.py --analysis-file analysis.json
Key Workflows
1. Competitive Scorecard Generation
Purpose : Create a comprehensive comparison scorecard between your product and competitors.
Trigger : User provides competitor code/documentation for analysis
Process :
Discovery Phase
Inventory competitor's capabilities (skills, commands, agents, features)
Catalog your own capabilities for comparison
Build comparison matrix with matched items
Analysis Phase
Score each dimension (6 weighted categories)
Apply scoring rubric (1-5 stars)
Calculate weighted totals
Scoring Dimensions :
Dimension Weight What to Evaluate
Documentation Completeness 20% Metadata, sections, examples, clarity Tool/Script Quality 20% CLI support, error handling, testing Workflow Coverage 15% Number of workflows, depth, practicality Architecture 15% Modularity, portability, dependencies Automation 15% Auto-generation, validation, CI/CD Reference Depth 15% Knowledge bases, templates, examples
Output Generation
Generate visual scorecard (ASCII box format)
Create feature comparison table
Summarize overall position (AHEAD / EVEN / BEHIND)
Deliverable : Competitive scorecard with visual summary and detailed breakdown
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COMPETITIVE SCORECARD │
│ US (claude-skills) vs THEM (Competitor) │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🏆 WE WIN: 12 areas (48%) - Our advantages │
│ 🤝 TIE: 8 areas (32%) - At parity │
│ 🔄 DIFFERENT: 3 areas (12%) - Neither better │
│ ❌ THEY WIN: 2 areas (8%) - Gaps to address │
│ │
│ Overall Position: WE ARE AHEAD │
│ Confidence: HIGH │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2. Feature Gap Analysis Purpose : Identify gaps in your product compared to competitors and prioritize which to address.
Trigger : After scorecard generation or standalone gap assessment request
Gap Identification (Always label clearly as US vs THEM)
THEY have, WE don't → Gaps for us to fillWE have, THEY don't → Our advantages to maintainDifferent approaches → Neither better, just differentTHEY score higher → Priority improvements for us
Gap Categorization
Category Symbol Action Critical Gap 🔴 Must address immediately Important Gap 🟠 Address in next quarter Nice-to-Have 🟡 Consider for roadmap Strategic Choice ⚪ Intentionally different
Impact Assessment
User impact (1-5)
Competitive urgency (1-5)
Strategic alignment (1-5)
Implementation effort (1-5)
Priority Calculation
Priority Score = (Impact × 0.4) + (Urgency × 0.3) + (Strategic × 0.2) + (1/Effort × 0.1)
Deliverable : Prioritized gap list with recommended actions
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GAP ANALYSIS │
│ US vs THEM Comparison │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 🏆 WHAT WE HAVE THAT THEY DON'T (Our Advantages) │
│ ├─ Executable Python tools (they have zero) │
│ ├─ Modular package structure (SKILL.md + scripts/) │
│ ├─ Agent integration │
│ └─ Builder tools for creation/validation │
│ │
│ ❌ WHAT THEY HAVE THAT WE DON'T (Gaps to Fill) │
│ ├─ Industry-specific guidance │
│ ├─ Methodology variants (Agile/Waterfall) │
│ └─ Detailed constraint documentation │
│ │
│ 🟢 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR US │
│ ├─ Add industry guides to our skill │
│ ├─ Document methodology variants │
│ └─ Add common challenges section │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
3. Competitive Advantage Identification Purpose : Document and articulate your competitive strengths.
Trigger : Strategy sessions, positioning reviews, or marketing alignment
Advantage Discovery
Features only you have
Areas where you score higher
Unique approaches or innovations
Integration capabilities
Advantage Classification
Type Description Example Technical Architecture or implementation superiority Zero-dependency design Quality Higher standards or better execution 100% validation rate Coverage More comprehensive offerings 28 skills vs 15 Innovation Novel approaches or features AI-assisted builders Integration Better ecosystem connectivity MCP server support
Strength Quantification
Measure the delta (how much better)
Identify sustainability (easy to copy?)
Assess market value (does it matter to users?)
Messaging Development
Elevator pitch for each advantage
Supporting evidence/metrics
Competitive positioning statement
Deliverable : Competitive advantage matrix with messaging guidance
4. Adoption Prioritization Purpose : Create a prioritized roadmap for adopting competitor features or innovations.
Trigger : After gap analysis, planning sessions, or roadmap reviews
Candidate Identification
Features worth adopting from competitors
Improvements needed for parity
Innovations to leapfrog competition
Evaluation Criteria
Criterion Weight Description User Value 30% How much will users benefit? Competitive Impact 25% Does this close a critical gap? Strategic Fit 20% Does it align with our direction? Implementation Cost 15% Resources and time required Risk Level 10% Technical and market risks
Prioritization Matrix
HIGH IMPACT
│
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ │ Quick │ │ Major │
│ │ Wins │ │Projects │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
│
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ │ Fill │ │ Consider│
│ │ Ins │ │ Later │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
│
└──────────────────────────→
LOW EFFORT HIGH EFFORT
Timeline Planning
Immediate (this sprint)
Short-term (this quarter)
Medium-term (next quarter)
Long-term (future consideration)
Deliverable : Adoption roadmap with prioritized items and timeline
Python Tools
competitive_analyzer.py Purpose : Core analysis engine for competitive comparison
python scripts/competitive_analyzer.py --competitor-path ./competitor-code --our-path ./
python scripts/competitive_analyzer.py --scope skills --competitor-path ./competitor
python scripts/competitive_analyzer.py --output json --competitor-path ./competitor
Auto-detection of skills, commands, agents
Pattern matching for comparison candidates
Weighted scoring calculation
Multiple output formats (markdown, json, console)
gap_analyzer.py Purpose : Identify and categorize feature gaps
python scripts/gap_analyzer.py --competitor-path ./competitor
python scripts/gap_analyzer.py --severity critical --competitor-path ./competitor
python scripts/gap_analyzer.py --prioritize --competitor-path ./competitor
Gap categorization (critical, important, nice-to-have)
Impact scoring
Priority calculation
Actionable recommendations
scorecard_generator.py Purpose : Generate visual scorecards and comparison tables
python scripts/scorecard_generator.py --analysis-file analysis.json
python scripts/scorecard_generator.py --format ascii --analysis-file analysis.json
python scripts/scorecard_generator.py --format markdown --analysis-file analysis.json
python scripts/scorecard_generator.py --detailed --analysis-file analysis.json
ASCII box scorecards
Markdown tables
Visual indicators (🟢 ✅ 🟡 ❌)
Executive summary generation
References
Assets/Templates
Integration with Agents This skill integrates with the following product team agents:
cs-product-strategist Uses competitive analysis for:
Market positioning decisions
Feature prioritization
Strategic planning sessions
Invocation : "Analyze competitor X against our product using the competitive-analysis skill"
cs-product-manager Uses competitive analysis for:
Roadmap planning
Feature gap identification
Sprint prioritization
Invocation : "Run a competitive scorecard against this repository"
cs-business-analyst Uses competitive analysis for:
Requirements gathering
Gap documentation
Stakeholder reporting
Invocation : "Generate a gap analysis comparing our capabilities to competitor Y"
Integration with Commands
/analyze.competition The slash command version of this skill for quick analysis:
/analyze.competition
/analyze.competition --scope skills
/analyze.competition --scope commands
/analyze.competition --output markdown
/analyze.competition --output json
Skill : Provides deep methodology, multiple workflows, reusable toolsCommand : Quick execution for ad-hoc analysis
Best Practices
Before Analysis
Gather Complete Data : Ensure you have access to competitor's full codebase or documentationDefine Scope : Determine what you're comparing (skills, commands, agents, all)Establish Baseline : Know your own inventory before comparing
During Analysis
Use Consistent Criteria : Apply the same scoring rubric to both sidesDocument Assumptions : Note any gaps in informationSeek Objectivity : Avoid bias toward your own product
After Analysis
Validate Findings : Have stakeholders review the scorecardPrioritize Ruthlessly : Focus on high-impact, low-effort items firstCreate Action Items : Convert insights into backlog itemsTrack Progress : Revisit gaps quarterly
Example Analysis Session
/analyze.competition
"Please paste the competitor code you want to analyze..."
[User pastes code]
Phase 1: Discovery... inventorying 15 competitor skills
Phase 2: Analysis... scoring across 6 dimensions
Phase 3: Gap Analysis... identifying 8 gaps, 12 advantages
Phase 4: Reporting... generating scorecard
Report saved to: output/sessions/{user}/{session}/competitive-analysis-2025-11-27.md
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COMPETITIVE SCORECARD │
│ US (claude-skills) vs THEM (Competitor) │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🏆 WE WIN: 12 areas (48%) - Our advantages │
│ 🤝 TIE: 8 areas (32%) - At parity │
│ 🔄 DIFFERENT: 3 areas (12%) - Neither better │
│ ❌ THEY WIN: 2 areas (8%) - Gaps to address │
│ │
│ Overall Position: WE ARE AHEAD │
│ Confidence: HIGH │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Dimension | US | THEM | Winner |
|-----------|-----|------|--------|
| Documentation | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | 🏆 THEM |
| Python Tools | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | 🏆 US |
| Workflows | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | 🏆 THEM |
| Architecture | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | 🏆 US |
| Automation | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ | 🏆 US |
| References | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | 🏆 US |
| What to Improve | Priority | Effort |
|-----------------|----------|--------|
| Add their workflow depth | 🟢 High | Low |
| Adopt their documentation patterns | 🟠 Medium | Medium |
Version History Version Date Changes 1.1.0 2025-11-27 Clearer US vs THEM labeling in all outputs 1.0.0 2025-11-27 Initial release with 4 workflows
Maintained By : Product Team
Last Updated : November 27, 2025
Status : Production
