| name | fosmvvm-swiftui-view-generator |
| description | Generate SwiftUI views that render FOSMVVM ViewModels. Scaffolds ViewModelView pattern with binding, loading states, and previews. |
| homepage | https://github.com/foscomputerservices/FOSUtilities |
| metadata | {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"📱","os":["darwin"]}} |
FOSMVVM SwiftUI View Generator
Generate SwiftUI views that render FOSMVVM ViewModels.
Conceptual Foundation
For full architecture context, see FOSMVVMArchitecture.md | OpenClaw reference
API catalog: check ../shared/api-catalog/FOSMVVM.md § SwiftUI Support before hand-writing helpers.
In FOSMVVM, Views are thin rendering layers that display ViewModels:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ViewModelView Pattern │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ViewModel (Data) ViewModelView (SwiftUI) │
│ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ title: String │────►│ Text(vm.title) │ │
│ │ items: [Item] │────►│ ForEach(vm.items)│ │
│ │ isEnabled: Bool │────►│ .disabled(!...) │ │
│ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Operations (Actions) │
│ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ submit() │◄────│ Button(action:) │ │
│ │ cancel() │◄────│ .onAppear { } │ │
│ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Key principle: Views don't transform or compute data. They render what the ViewModel provides.
View-ViewModel Alignment
The View filename should match the ViewModel it renders.
Sources/
{ViewModelsTarget}/
{Feature}/
{Feature}ViewModel.swift ←──┐
{Entity}CardViewModel.swift ←──┼── Same names
│
{ViewsTarget}/ │
{Feature}/ │
{Feature}View.swift ────┤ (renders {Feature}ViewModel)
{Entity}CardView.swift ────┘ (renders {Entity}CardViewModel)
This alignment provides:
- Discoverability - Find the view for any ViewModel instantly
- Consistency - Same naming discipline across the codebase
- Maintainability - Changes to ViewModel are reflected in view location
Core Components
1. ViewModelView Protocol
Every view conforms to ViewModelView:
public struct MyView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: MyViewModel
public var body: some View {
Text(viewModel.title)
}
public init(viewModel: MyViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
}
}
Required:
private let viewModel: {ViewModel}
public init(viewModel:)
- Conforms to
ViewModelView protocol
2. Operations (Optional)
Display-only views skip this entire section. A View whose ViewModel has no operations property is display-only by definition — no Operations files exist on either side of the seam, no repaintToggle, no testDataTransporter. Do not invent an empty Operations protocol for symmetry; absence of operations is the signal that the View is display-only. (See "View Categories" below for the full distinction.)
Operations are an architectural seam
An Operations protocol is the framework-side analog of ServerRequest: a contract the View calls into without knowing who satisfies it. Three files participate, on two sides of the seam:
| File | Side | Purpose |
|---|
<Name>Operations.swift | Framework (shared module) | The protocol — what actions the View can dispatch |
<Name>StubOps.swift | Framework (shared module) | Stub implementation — used in previews and LocalizableTestCase-driven tests |
<Name>Ops.swift | App target (implementation side) | Live implementation — orchestrates services, writes to storage, dispatches ServerRequests |
For a feature LandingPage, these live at:
Sources/ViewModels/Operations/LandingPage/LandingPageOperations.swift
Sources/ViewModels/Operations/LandingPage/LandingPageStubOps.swift
Sources/{AppTarget}/Operations/LandingPage/LandingPageOps.swift
The View imports only the framework side and is unaware of which implementation runs. App Intents, lock-screen transport actions, and other non-View entry points dispatch through the same Operations protocol — the View is one entry point of several, not the owner of the action vocabulary.
Two protocol layers to keep distinct:
FOSMVVM.ViewModelOperations — the framework's base protocol. Every per-feature operations protocol conforms to it.
<Name>ViewModelOperations (e.g., LandingPageViewModelOperations) — your project's per-feature protocol; conforms to FOSMVVM.ViewModelOperations and lists the actions the View dispatches.
Generic over any at op method signatures
Per the architecture rule (no existentials at architectural boundaries), Operations method signatures take Fields conformers as generic parameters, not any:
protocol ConversationOperations: ViewModelOperations {
func create<F: ConversationFields>(from fields: F) async throws
}
protocol ConversationOperations: ViewModelOperations {
func create(from fields: any ConversationFields) async throws
}
Storage is a separate decision from method signatures. The View's operations property is typed as any <Name>ViewModelOperations — that's required, since Apple's API forces a concrete View struct shape and the View has to store the value somehow. This is the exception arch.md §1.5 explicitly carves out for "structural requirements that leave no alternative."
Crucially, any at storage does not infect the protocol's method signatures. Swift 5.7+ opens the existential implicitly at each call site, so a generic method called on an any P value still specializes to a concrete type at the call site:
private let operations: any ConversationOperations
private func submit() async throws {
try await operations.create(from: fields)
}
The rule to internalize: any is acceptable at single-value storage sites; generics are required at protocol method signatures. The architecture's anti-existential pressure is about preventing erasure from compounding through the call graph — and a stored any P does not compound, because each method call re-specializes.
Server-backed example
Interactive views have operations:
public struct MyView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: MyViewModel
private let operations: any MyViewModelOperations
#if DEBUG
@State private var repaintToggle = false
#endif
public var body: some View {
Button(action: performAction) {
Text(viewModel.buttonLabel)
}
#if DEBUG
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
#endif
}
public init(viewModel: MyViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
private func performAction() {
operations.performAction()
toggleRepaint()
}
private func toggleRepaint() {
#if DEBUG
repaintToggle.toggle()
#endif
}
}
When views have operations:
- Store
operations from viewModel.operations in init
- Add
@State private var repaintToggle = false (DEBUG only)
- Add
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps:repaintToggle:) modifier (DEBUG only)
- Call
toggleRepaint() after every operation invocation
Why toggleRepaint() exists. Client-hosted ops mutate @Observable storage that test harnesses (and occasionally SwiftUI itself) don't always re-observe in time for the next assertion. Toggling a @State flag forces a deterministic re-render at the View boundary, so UI tests see the post-op state instead of the pre-op state. In production builds the toggle is compiled out — it costs nothing at runtime.
Async vs sync op shape. Server-backed ops are typically async (try await operations.performAction()) and pair with Button(errorBinding:asyncAction:) / .task(errorBinding:) / .onAsyncSubmit. Client-hosted scalar-mutation ops are typically sync — the live op writes a property on @Observable storage and returns. Don't add async to an op method that doesn't need it; don't omit async on one that calls a ServerRequest.
The example above shows a server-backed op — operations.performAction() dispatches a ServerRequest. For client-hosted ops (those that mutate local @Observable storage), the call site shape is different — the View must inject storage from the environment and hand it to the op explicitly. See below.
2a. Client-Hosted Operations: @Environment Injection and output: at the Call Site
Applies when the ViewModel is client-hosted and its operations mutate one or more @Observable storage objects (e.g., UserSettings, DeviceState). Server-backed operations use the plain pattern shown in section 2.
Client-hosted ops take their write target as a trailing output storage: parameter. The ViewModel does not hold a reference to storage (see Architecture Patterns → VMs Hold Scalars); the View reads storage from @Environment and hands the reference to the op at the call site.
public struct PreferencesView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(UserSettings.self) private var settings
private let viewModel: PreferencesViewModel
private let operations: any PreferencesViewModelOperations
#if DEBUG
@State private var repaintToggle = false
#endif
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Toggle(
viewModel.notificationsLabel,
isOn: Binding(
get: { viewModel.notificationsEnabled },
set: { setNotifications($0) }
)
)
Picker(viewModel.themeLabel, selection: Binding(
get: { viewModel.theme },
set: { setTheme($0) }
)) {
}
}
#if DEBUG
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
#endif
}
public init(viewModel: PreferencesViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
private func setNotifications(_ enabled: Bool) {
operations.setNotificationsEnabled(enabled, output: settings)
toggleRepaint()
}
private func setTheme(_ theme: Theme) {
operations.setTheme(theme, output: settings)
toggleRepaint()
}
private func toggleRepaint() {
#if DEBUG
repaintToggle.toggle()
#endif
}
}
The mental model:
@Environment(UserSettings.self) puts the reference on the View.
- The VM has scalars only (
viewModel.notificationsEnabled: Bool, viewModel.theme: Theme), projected from settings by the parent's .bind(appState: .init(...)) call. The VM never holds the UserSettings reference.
- The mutation closure reads
settings from its own @Environment and passes it to the op as output: settings. The reference never crosses the VM boundary.
Common mistakes to avoid:
| Anti-pattern | Why it's wrong |
|---|
@State private var settings = UserSettings() on the view | View should read storage from @Environment, not own it |
viewModel.settings = ... | VMs never hold @Observable references (rule 4 of Forward Projection) |
operations.setTheme(.dark) (no output:) | Mutation has no target — the op can't write anywhere |
operations.setTheme(.dark, in: settings) | in reads like input; output is the correct label (conflation anti-pattern) |
Reading settings.theme in this View's body for display | Display reads belong on the VM scalar (viewModel.theme); env reads break projection |
Full rationale — why the VM holds scalars, why the reference flows through the call site rather than the VM, what breaks otherwise — lives in Architecture Patterns → Ops Conventions and Architecture Patterns → The Four Rules of Forward Projection.
3. Child View Binding
Parent views bind child views using .bind(appState:):
public struct ParentView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(AppState.self) private var appState
private let viewModel: ParentViewModel
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Text(viewModel.title)
ChildView.bind(
appState: .init(
itemId: viewModel.selectedId,
isConnected: viewModel.isConnected
)
)
}
}
}
The .bind() pattern:
- Child views use
.bind(appState:) to receive data from parent
- Parent creates child's
AppState from its own ViewModel data
- Enables composition without tight coupling
4. Form Views with Validation
Forms use FormFieldView and Validations environment:
public struct MyFormView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(Validations.self) private var validations
@Environment(\.focusState) private var focusField
@State private var error: Error?
private let viewModel: MyFormViewModel
private let operations: any MyFormViewModelOperations
public var body: some View {
Form {
FormFieldView(
fieldModel: viewModel.$email,
focusField: focusField,
fieldValidator: viewModel.validateEmail,
validations: validations
)
Button(errorBinding: $error, asyncAction: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitButtonLabel)
}
.disabled(validations.hasError)
}
.onAsyncSubmit {
await submit()
}
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
}
}
Form patterns:
@Environment(Validations.self) for validation state
FormFieldView for each input field
Button(errorBinding:asyncAction:) for async actions
.disabled(validations.hasError) on submit button
- Separate handling for validation errors vs general errors
5. Previews
Use .previewHost() for SwiftUI previews:
#if DEBUG
#Preview {
MyView.previewHost(
bundle: MyAppResourceAccess.localizationBundle
)
.environment(AppState())
}
#Preview("With Data") {
MyView.previewHost(
bundle: MyAppResourceAccess.localizationBundle,
viewModel: .stub(title: "Preview Title")
)
.environment(AppState())
}
#endif
View Categories
The first decision when generating a View is interactive vs. display-only — and that decision is forced by the ViewModel, not chosen by the View author.
ViewModel has operations property? | View kind | Operations files |
|---|
| No | Display-only | None — do not create empty Operations protocol/Stub/Live files |
| Yes | Interactive (server-backed or client-hosted) | <Name>Operations.swift + <Name>StubOps.swift (framework side) + <Name>Ops.swift (app side) |
Absence of operations is a positive signal that the View originates no actions. Inventing an empty Operations protocol "for symmetry" is an anti-pattern (arch.md §3.4).
Display-Only Views
Views that just render data (no user interactions):
public struct InfoView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: InfoViewModel
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Text(viewModel.title)
Text(viewModel.description)
if viewModel.isActive {
Text(viewModel.activeStatusLabel)
}
}
}
public init(viewModel: InfoViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
}
}
Characteristics:
- No
operations property
- No
repaintToggle or testDataTransporter
- Just renders ViewModel properties
- May have conditional rendering based on ViewModel state
Interactive Views
Views with user actions:
public struct ActionView: ViewModelView {
@State private var error: Error?
private let viewModel: ActionViewModel
private let operations: any ActionViewModelOperations
#if DEBUG
@State private var repaintToggle = false
#endif
public var body: some View {
VStack {
Button(action: performAction) {
Text(viewModel.actionLabel)
}
Button(role: .cancel, action: cancel) {
Text(viewModel.cancelLabel)
}
}
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
#if DEBUG
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
#endif
}
public init(viewModel: ActionViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
private func performAction() {
operations.performAction()
toggleRepaint()
}
private func cancel() {
operations.cancel()
toggleRepaint()
}
private func toggleRepaint() {
#if DEBUG
repaintToggle.toggle()
#endif
}
}
Form Views
Views with validated input fields:
- Use
FormFieldView for each input
@Environment(Validations.self) for validation state
- Button disabled when
validations.hasError
- Separate error handling for validation vs operation errors
Container Views
Views that compose child views:
public struct ContainerView: ViewModelView {
@Environment(AppState.self) private var appState
private let viewModel: ContainerViewModel
private let operations: any ContainerViewModelOperations
public var body: some View {
VStack {
switch viewModel.state {
case .loading:
ProgressView()
case .ready:
ChildAView.bind(
appState: .init(id: viewModel.selectedId)
)
ChildBView.bind(
appState: .init(
isActive: viewModel.isActive,
level: viewModel.level
)
)
}
}
}
}
When to Use This Skill
- Creating a new SwiftUI view for a FOSMVVM app
- Building UI to render a ViewModel
- Following an implementation plan that requires new views
- Creating forms with validation
- Building container views that compose child views
What This Skill Generates
| File | Location | Purpose |
|---|
{ViewName}View.swift | Sources/{ViewsTarget}/{Feature}/ | The SwiftUI view |
Note: The corresponding ViewModel and ViewModelOperations should already exist (use fosmvvm-viewmodel-generator skill).
Project Structure Configuration
| Placeholder | Description | Example |
|---|
{ViewName} | View name (without "View" suffix) | TaskList, SignIn |
{ViewsTarget} | SwiftUI views SPM target | MyAppViews |
{Feature} | Feature/module grouping | Tasks, Auth |
Pattern Implementation
This skill references conversation context to determine view structure:
View Type Detection
From conversation context, the skill identifies:
- ViewModel structure (from prior discussion or specifications read by Claude)
- View category: Display-only, interactive, form, or container
- Operations needed: Whether view has user-initiated actions
- Child composition: Whether view binds child views
Component Selection
Based on view type:
- Display-only: ViewModelView protocol, viewModel property only
- Interactive: Add operations, repaintToggle, testDataTransporter, toggleRepaint()
- Form: Add Validations environment, FormFieldView, validation error handling
- Container: Add child view
.bind() calls
Code Generation
Generates view file with:
ViewModelView protocol conformance
- Properties (viewModel, operations if needed, repaintToggle if interactive)
- Body with rendering logic
- Init storing viewModel and operations
- Action methods (if interactive)
- Test infrastructure (if interactive)
- Previews for different states
Context Sources
Skill references information from:
- Prior conversation: Requirements discussed with user
- Specification files: If Claude has read specifications into context
- ViewModel definitions: From codebase or discussion
Key Patterns
Error Handling Pattern
@State private var error: Error?
var body: some View {
VStack {
Button(errorBinding: $error, asyncAction: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
}
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
}
private func submit() async {
do {
try await operations.submit()
} catch {
self.error = error
}
toggleRepaint()
}
Validation Error Pattern
For forms, handle validation errors separately:
private func submit() async {
let validations = validations
do {
try await operations.submit(data: viewModel.data)
} catch let error as MyRequest.ResponseError {
if !error.validationResults.isEmpty {
validations.replace(with: error.validationResults)
} else {
self.error = error
}
} catch {
self.error = error
}
toggleRepaint()
}
Async Task Pattern
var body: some View {
VStack {
if isLoading {
ProgressView()
} else {
contentView
}
}
.task(errorBinding: $error) {
try await loadData()
}
}
private func loadData() async throws {
isLoading = true
try await operations.loadData()
isLoading = false
toggleRepaint()
}
Conditional Rendering Pattern
Use ViewModel state for conditionals:
var body: some View {
VStack {
if viewModel.isEmpty {
Text(viewModel.emptyStateMessage)
} else {
ForEach(viewModel.items) { item in
ItemRow(item: item)
}
}
}
}
Computed View Components Pattern
Extract reusable view fragments as computed properties:
private var headerView: some View {
HStack {
Text(viewModel.title)
Spacer()
Image(systemName: viewModel.iconName)
}
}
var body: some View {
VStack {
headerView
contentView
}
}
Result/Error Handling Pattern
When a view needs to render multiple possible ViewModels (success, various error types), use an enum wrapper:
The Wrapper ViewModel:
@ViewModel
public struct TaskResultViewModel {
public enum Result {
case success(TaskViewModel)
case notFound(NotFoundViewModel)
case validationError(ValidationErrorViewModel)
case permissionDenied(PermissionDeniedViewModel)
}
public let result: Result
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init(type: Self.self)
public init(result: Result) {
self.result = result
}
}
The View:
public struct TaskResultView: ViewModelView {
private let viewModel: TaskResultViewModel
public var body: some View {
switch viewModel.result {
case .success(let vm):
TaskView(viewModel: vm)
case .notFound(let vm):
NotFoundView(viewModel: vm)
case .validationError(let vm):
ValidationErrorView(viewModel: vm)
case .permissionDenied(let vm):
PermissionDeniedView(viewModel: vm)
}
}
public init(viewModel: TaskResultViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
}
}
Key principles:
- Each error scenario has its own ViewModel type
- The wrapper enum associates specific ViewModels with each case
- The view switches on the enum and renders the appropriate child view
- Maintains type safety (no
any ViewModel existentials)
- No generic error handling - each error type is specific and meaningful
ViewModelId Initialization - CRITICAL
IMPORTANT: ViewModelId controls SwiftUI's view identity system via the .id(vmId) modifier. Incorrect initialization causes SwiftUI to treat different data as the same view, breaking updates.
❌ WRONG - Never use this:
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init()
✅ MINIMUM - Use type-based identity:
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init(type: Self.self)
This ensures views of the same type get unique identities.
✅ IDEAL - Use data-based identity when available:
public struct TaskViewModel {
public let id: ModelIdType
public var vmId: ViewModelId
public init(id: ModelIdType, ) {
self.id = id
self.vmId = .init(id: id)
}
}
Why this matters:
- SwiftUI uses
.id() modifier to determine when to recreate vs update views
vmId provides this identity for ViewModelViews
- Wrong identity = views don't update when data changes
- Data-based identity (
.init(id:)) is best because it ties view lifecycle to data lifecycle
File Organization
Sources/{ViewsTarget}/
├── {Feature}/
│ ├── {Feature}View.swift # Full page → {Feature}ViewModel
│ ├── {Entity}CardView.swift # Child component → {Entity}CardViewModel
│ ├── {Entity}RowView.swift # Child component → {Entity}RowViewModel
│ └── {Modal}View.swift # Modal → {Modal}ViewModel
├── Shared/
│ ├── HeaderView.swift # Shared components
│ └── FooterView.swift
└── Styles/
└── ButtonStyles.swift # Reusable button styles
Common Mistakes
Computing Data in Views
var body: some View {
Text("\(viewModel.firstName) \(viewModel.lastName)")
}
var body: some View {
Text(viewModel.fullName)
}
Forgetting to Call toggleRepaint()
private func submit() {
operations.submit()
}
private func submit() {
operations.submit()
toggleRepaint()
}
Using Computed Properties for Display
var body: some View {
if !viewModel.items.isEmpty {
Text("You have \(viewModel.items.count) items")
}
}
var body: some View {
if viewModel.hasItems {
Text(viewModel.itemCountMessage)
}
}
Hardcoding Text
Button(action: submit) {
Text("Submit")
}
Button(action: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitButtonLabel)
}
Missing Error Binding
Button(action: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
Button(errorBinding: $error, asyncAction: submit) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
Storing Operations in Body Instead of Init
public var body: some View {
let operations = viewModel.operations
Button(action: { operations.submit() }) {
Text(viewModel.submitLabel)
}
}
private let operations: any MyOperations
public init(viewModel: MyViewModel) {
self.viewModel = viewModel
self.operations = viewModel.operations
}
Mismatched Filenames
// ❌ BAD - Filename doesn't match ViewModel
ViewModel: TaskListViewModel
View: TasksView.swift
// ✅ GOOD - Aligned names
ViewModel: TaskListViewModel
View: TaskListView.swift
Incorrect ViewModelId Initialization
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init()
public var vmId: ViewModelId = .init(type: Self.self)
public init(id: ModelIdType) {
self.id = id
self.vmId = .init(id: id)
}
Force-Unwrapping Localizable Strings
import SwiftUI
Text(try! viewModel.title.localizedString)
Label(try! viewModel.label.localizedString, systemImage: "star")
extension Text {
public init(_ localizable: Localizable) {
self.init(localizable.localized)
}
}
extension Label where Title == Text, Icon == Image {
public init(_ title: Localizable, systemImage: String) {
self.init(title.localized, systemImage: systemImage)
}
}
Text(viewModel.title)
Label(viewModel.label, systemImage: "star")
Why this matters:
FOSMVVM provides the Localizable protocol for all localized strings and includes SwiftUI init overloads for common elements like Text. However, not every SwiftUI element has a Localizable overload yet.
When you encounter a SwiftUI element that doesn't accept Localizable directly:
- DON'T work around it with
try! localizable.localizedString - this bypasses the type system and spreads force-unwrap calls throughout the view code
- DO request that we add the proper init overload to FOSUtilities for that SwiftUI element
- The pattern is simple: Extensions that accept
Localizable and pass .localized to the standard initializer
This approach keeps the codebase clean, type-safe, and eliminates force-unwraps from view code entirely.
File Templates
See reference.md for complete file templates.
Naming Conventions
| Concept | Convention | Example |
|---|
| View struct | {Name}View | TaskListView, SignInView |
| ViewModel property | viewModel | Always viewModel |
| Operations property | operations | Always operations |
| Error state | error | Always error |
| Repaint toggle | repaintToggle | Always repaintToggle |
Common Modifiers
FOSMVVM-Specific Modifiers
.alert(
errorBinding: $error,
title: viewModel.errorTitle,
message: viewModel.errorMessage,
dismissButtonLabel: viewModel.dismissButtonLabel
)
.task(errorBinding: $error) {
try await loadData()
}
.onAsyncSubmit {
await submit()
}
.testDataTransporter(viewModelOps: operations, repaintToggle: $repaintToggle)
.uiTestingIdentifier("submitButton")
Standard SwiftUI Modifiers
Apply standard modifiers as needed for layout, styling, etc.
How to Use This Skill
Invocation:
/fosmvvm-swiftui-view-generator
Prerequisites:
- ViewModel and its structure are understood from conversation
- Optionally, specification files have been read into context
- View requirements (display-only, interactive, form, container) are clear from discussion
Output:
{ViewName}View.swift - SwiftUI view conforming to ViewModelView protocol
Workflow integration:
This skill is typically used after discussing requirements or reading specification files. The skill references that context automatically—no file paths or Q&A needed.
See Also
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-01-23 | Initial skill for SwiftUI view generation |
| 1.1 | 2026-05-03 | Operations section rewrite to align with ConversationPractice/docs/architecture.md: surface the framework/app-side seam (<Name>Operations.swift / <Name>StubOps.swift / <Name>Ops.swift file convention), distinguish FOSMVVM.ViewModelOperations from per-feature protocols, note App Intents/transport actions share the same protocol, document toggleRepaint() motivation, clarify async vs sync op shape, promote display-only-no-Operations decision to a top-level rule. Clarify the storage-vs-method-signature distinction: any is acceptable at single-value View storage (Swift 5.7+ implicit existential opening preserves generic specialization at call sites); generics are required at protocol method signatures. All View examples updated to private let operations: any <Name>ViewModelOperations. |