ck-plan

name	ck:plan
description	Plan implementations, design architectures, create technical roadmaps with detailed phases. Use for feature planning, system design, solution architecture, implementation strategy, phase documentation.
user-invocable	true
when_to_use	Invoke when work needs phases, architecture, or a roadmap.
category	utilities
keywords	["planning","architecture","phases","roadmap"]
argument-hint	[task] [--fast|--hard|--deep|--parallel|--two] [--tdd|--no-tasks] OR [archive|red-team|validate]
license	MIT
metadata	{"author":"claudekit","version":"1.1.0"}

Planning

Create detailed technical implementation plans through research, codebase analysis, solution design, and comprehensive documentation.

Prerequisites

• ClaudeKit CLI required: This skill requires ck CLI for plan operations. Run npm install -g claudekit if not installed.

CLI Integration

This skill orchestrates planning, but ClaudeKit CLI now owns the plan file scaffolding and phase state mutations whenever ck is available.

Use these commands instead of hand-editing CLI-managed plan structure:

ck plan create \
  --title "{plan title}" \
  --phases "{Research},{Implement},{Test}" \
  --dir {plan-dir} \
  --source skill

ck plan create \
  --global \
  --title "{plan title}" \
  --phases "{Research},{Implement},{Test}" \
  --dir {plan-dir} \
  --source skill

cd /absolute/path/to/plan-dir && ck plan check <phase-id> --start
cd /absolute/path/to/plan-dir && ck plan check <phase-id>
cd /absolute/path/to/plan-dir && ck plan uncheck <phase-id>
ck plan status /absolute/path/to/plan.md
ck config ui --port 3456

Rules:

• Use ck plan create to scaffold plan.md and phase-*.md when the CLI is available.
• Default scope is project-local (./plans/ under the current project).
• Global scope is conditional: use ck plan create --global ... or fall back to global scope only when no project context exists.
• Use ck plan check / ck plan uncheck for phase status changes.
• Do not hand-edit the phases table for status toggles or structural updates when CLI commands are available.
• Use the dashboard at http://localhost:3456/plans for visual plan management.
• Generated-file write guard: ck plan create creates existing plan.md and phase-XX-*.md stub files. Before composing long replacement content, run a read pass over plan.md and every generated phase stub. A directory listing is not enough. Claude Code enforces Read-before-Write on existing files; skipping any stub read causes that file's Write to be rejected after wasting the full Write payload. The stubs are tiny, so read them all first, then fill them.

Mandatory Generated-File Read Pass

After ck plan create and before the first long Write/Edit to any generated plan file:

1. Enumerate generated files: plan.md plus all phase-*.md.
2. Read plan.md.
3. Read every generated phase-*.md stub, including future phases you have not drafted yet.
4. Only after the read pass, write or edit the full content for plan.md and each phase.

Do not draft or submit a full phase body for a generated stub that has not been read in the current session.

Canonical Phase File Template

Use this structure when filling each phase-XX-*.md. Loaded once with the skill — no per-file Read needed to learn it. Frontmatter fields match the CLI's phase schema; section headers match documentation-management.md so phase files stay consistent across plans.

---
phase: <N>
title: "<Phase Name>"
status: pending       # pending | in-progress | completed
priority: P2          # P1 | P2 | P3
effort: ""            # e.g. "4h", "2d"
dependencies: []      # phase IDs this blocks on
---

# Phase <id>: <Name>

## Overview
<1-2 sentences describing what this phase delivers>

## Requirements
- Functional: ...
- Non-functional: ...

## Architecture
<Design, data flow, component interactions>

## Related Code Files
- Create: `path/...`
- Modify: `path/...`
- Delete: `path/...`

## Implementation Steps
1. ...
2. ...

## Success Criteria
- [ ] ...

## Risk Assessment
<Risks + mitigations>

IMPORTANT: Before you start, scan unfinished plans in the active scope first:

• Project scope: ./plans/
• Global scope: the configured global plans root
  • Default when unset: ~/.claude/plans/

If there are relevant plans overlapping your upcoming plan, update them as well. If you're unsure or need more clarifications, use AskUserQuestion tool to ask the user.

Scope Selection

• Project scope is the default whenever the current working tree has project context.
• Global scope is allowed only when:
  • the user explicitly asks for it via --global, or
  • there is no project context to anchor a local plan.
• No project context means no .git, package.json, or CLAUDE.md was found in the ancestor chain.
• Keep scope honest in prose and examples: the skill describes CLI-owned behavior, it does not implement scope resolution itself.

Cross-Plan Dependency Detection

During the pre-creation scan, detect and mark blocking relationships between plans:

1. Scan — Read plan.md frontmatter of each unfinished plan (status != completed/cancelled)
2. Compare scope — Check overlapping files, shared dependencies, same feature area
3. Classify relationship:
   • New plan needs output of existing plan → new plan blockedBy: [existing-plan-dir]
   • New plan changes something existing plan depends on → existing plan blockedBy: [new-plan-dir], new plan blocks: [existing-plan-dir]
   • Cross-scope dependency → use global: or project: prefixes
   • Mutual dependency → both plans reference each other in blockedBy/blocks
4. Bidirectional update — When relationship detected, update BOTH plan.md files' frontmatter
5. Ambiguous? → Use AskUserQuestion with header "Plan Dependency", present detected overlap, ask user to confirm relationship type (blocks/blockedBy/none)

Frontmatter fields:

blockedBy: [260301-1200-auth-system]            # Same-scope dependency
blockedBy: [global:260301-1200-auth-system]     # Cross-scope dependency
blocks: [project:260228-0900-user-dashboard]    # Explicit project-scope dependency

Status interaction: ck plan status is the authoritative inspection surface. Same-scope bare refs stay in the current scope; prefixed refs resolve against the explicit project/global root. Missing refs should warn and show not found, not hard-fail the plan.

Default (No Arguments)

If invoked with a task description, proceed with planning workflow. If invoked WITHOUT arguments or with unclear intent, use AskUserQuestion to present available operations:

Operation	Description
(default)	Create implementation plan for a task
archive	Write journal entry & archive plans
red-team	Adversarial plan review
validate	Critical questions interview

Present as options via AskUserQuestion with header "Planning Operation", question "What would you like to do?".

Workflow Modes

Default: auto-detect planning mode (analyze task complexity and pick mode).

Flag	Mode	Research	Red Team	Validation	Cook Flag
--auto	Auto-detect	Follows mode	Follows mode	Follows mode	Follows mode
--fast	Fast	Skip	Skip	Skip	(none)
--hard	Hard	2 researchers	Yes	Optional	(none)
--deep	Deep	2-3 researchers + per-phase scout	Yes	Yes	(none)
--parallel	Parallel	2 researchers	Yes	Optional	--parallel
--two	Two approaches	2+ researchers	After selection	After selection	(none)

Composable flags (combine with any mode):

Flag	Effect
--tdd	Add tests-first structure to each phase for regression-safe refactors
--no-tasks	Skip task hydration

Load: references/workflow-modes.md for auto-detection logic, per-mode workflows, context reminders.

When to Use

• Planning new feature implementations
• Architecting system designs
• Evaluating technical approaches
• Creating implementation roadmaps
• Breaking down complex requirements

Core Responsibilities & Rules

Always honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles. Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.

0. Scope Challenge

Load: references/scope-challenge.md Skip if: --fast mode or trivial task (single file fix, <20 word description)

1. Research & Analysis

Load: references/research-phase.md Skip if: Fast mode or provided with researcher reports

2. Codebase Understanding

Load: references/codebase-understanding.md Skip if: Provided with scout reports

3. Solution Design

Load: references/solution-design.md

4. Plan Creation & Organization

Load: references/plan-organization.md

5. Task Breakdown & Output Standards

Load: references/output-standards.md

Process Flow (Authoritative)

flowchart TD
    A[Pre-Creation Check] --> B[Cross-Plan Scan]
    B --> C[Scope Challenge]
    C --> D[Mode Detection]
    D -->|fast| E[Skip Research]
    D -->|hard/deep/parallel/two| F[Spawn Researchers]
    E --> G[Codebase Analysis]
    F --> G
    G --> H[Write Plan via Planner]
    H --> I{Red Team?}
    I -->|Yes| J[Red Team Review]
    I -->|No| K{Validate?}
    J --> K
    K -->|Yes| V[Verification Pass]
    K -->|No| M[Hydrate Tasks]
    V --> L[Validation Interview]
    L --> M
    M --> N[Present Boundary Reminder]
    N --> P[Post-Plan Handoff<br/>AskUserQuestion: skip gates already auto-run]
    P --> O[Journal]

This diagram is the authoritative workflow. Prose sections below provide detail for each node.

Workflow Process

1. Pre-Creation Check → Check Plan Context for active/suggested/none 1b. Cross-Plan Scan → Scan unfinished plans, detect blockedBy/blocks relationships, update both plans 1c. Scope Challenge → Run Step 0 scope questions, select mode (see references/scope-challenge.md) Skip if: --fast mode or trivial task
2. Mode Detection → Auto-detect or use explicit flag (see workflow-modes.md)
3. Research Phase → Spawn researchers (skip in fast mode)
4. Codebase Analysis → Read docs, scout if needed
5. Plan Documentation → Write comprehensive plan via planner subagent
6. Red Team Review → Run /ck:plan red-team {plan-path} (hard/deep/parallel/two modes)
7. Post-Plan Validation → Run /ck:plan validate {plan-path} (hard/deep/parallel/two modes)
8. Hydrate Tasks → Create Claude Tasks from phases (default on, --no-tasks to skip)
9. Boundary Reminder → Present optional next-step commands with absolute path
10. Journal → Run /ck:journal to write a concise technical journal entry upon completion

Whole-Plan Consistency Gate

This gate is mandatory after /ck:plan validate or /ck:plan red-team edits any plan file. Load: references/verification-roles.md → "Whole-Plan Consistency Sweep".

Before recommending /ck:cook, re-read plan.md and every phase-*.md file. Search all plan files for stale terms, rejected assumptions, renamed APIs/files/fields, superseded decisions, and duplicate embedded drafts/contracts. Reconcile contradictions across the entire plan, not only the edited phase.

If unresolved contradictions remain, report them and ask the user. Do not recommend cook until the whole-plan consistency sweep reports zero unresolved contradictions.

Output Requirements

IMPORTANT: Invoke "/ck:project-organization" skill to organize the outputs.

• DO NOT implement code - only create plans
• Respond with plan file path and summary
• Ensure self-contained plans with necessary context
• Include code snippets/pseudocode when clarifying
• Fully respect the ./docs/development-rules.md file

Task Management

Plan files = persistent. Tasks = session-scoped. Hydration bridges the gap.

Default: Auto-hydrate tasks after plan files are written. Skip with --no-tasks. 3-Task Rule: <3 phases → skip task creation. Fallback: Task tools (TaskCreate/TaskUpdate/TaskGet/TaskList) are CLI-only — unavailable in VSCode extension. If they error, use TodoWrite for tracking. Plan files remain the source of truth; hydration is an optimization, not a requirement.

Load: references/task-management.md for hydration pattern, TaskCreate patterns, cook handoff protocol.

Hydration Workflow

1. Write plan.md + phase files (persistent layer)
2. TaskCreate per phase with addBlockedBy chain (skip if Task tools unavailable)
3. TaskCreate for critical/high-risk steps within phases (skip if Task tools unavailable)
4. Metadata: phase, priority, effort, planDir, phaseFile
5. Cook picks up via TaskList (same session) or re-hydrates (new session)

Active Plan State

Check ## Plan Context injected by hooks:

• "Plan: {path}" → Active plan. Ask "Continue? [Y/n]"
• "Suggested: {path}" → Branch hint only. Ask if activate or create new.
• "Plan: none" → Create new using Plan dir: from ## Naming

After creating plan: node .claude/scripts/set-active-plan.cjs {plan-dir} Reports: Active plans → plan-specific path. Suggested → default path.

Important

DO NOT create plans or reports in arbitrary user directories. MUST create plans or reports in one of these allowed roots:

• project scope → current working project directory
• global scope → configured global plans root
  • Default when unset: ~/.claude/plans/

Subcommands

Subcommand	Reference	Purpose
/ck:plan archive	references/archive-workflow.md	Archive plans + write journal entries
/ck:plan red-team	references/red-team-workflow.md	Adversarial plan review with hostile reviewers
/ck:plan validate	references/validate-workflow.md	Validate plan with critical questions interview

Post-Plan Handoff (MANDATORY at session end)

After plan.md + phase files are written and the user has reviewed/approved them, use AskUserQuestion to offer the appropriate next step. Recommend the option that best fits the plan's risk/scope; recommended option listed FIRST and labelled "(Recommended)".

Option	Recommend When	Why
/ck:plan validate	Plan is moderate-to-complex; user wants critical-questions interview before implementation	Cheapest gate — surfaces unspecified assumptions, missing acceptance criteria, hand-wavy phases
/ck:plan red-team	Plan touches security, auth, payments, data integrity, public APIs, infra, or has high blast radius	Adversarial reviewers stress-test the plan for failure modes, attack vectors, and missing edge cases
/ck:cook <plan-path>	Plan is small / well-understood / low-risk and user wants to start implementation	Skip extra gates; go straight to implementation
End session	User wants to review/share plan before deciding	Stop with plan path returned

Skip this step ONLY when:

• The current invocation IS already a subcommand (validate, red-team, archive) — those have their own terminal handoff.
• User explicitly said "just plan, don't suggest next step".

Skip an individual option ONLY when the active mode already auto-ran that gate (per Workflow Process Steps 6-7):

• Omit /ck:plan red-team from the offered options when mode is --hard, --deep, --parallel, or --two (Step 6 already ran adversarial review).
• Omit /ck:plan validate from the offered options when mode is --deep (Step 7 already ran validation).
• If both gates already ran, the Post-Plan Handoff still fires but offers only /ck:cook <plan-path> and End session.

After selection: invoke the chosen command with the plan path as argument for continuity.

Quality Standards

• Thorough and specific, consider long-term maintainability
• Research thoroughly when uncertain
• Address security and performance concerns
• Detailed enough for junior developers
• Validate against existing codebase patterns

Remember: Plan quality determines implementation success. Be comprehensive and consider all solution aspects.

Workflow Position

Typically follows: /ck:brainstorm (after exploring options), /ck:scout (after codebase discovery) May precede: /ck:cook after user approval (otherwise stop with plan path and next-step options) Related: /ck:brainstorm (explore before planning), /ck:cook (execute after planning)