| name | audit-docs |
| user-invocable | true |
| version | 2.0.1 |
| argument-hint | [--fix] |
| author | Gabriel Trabanco <gtrabanco@users.noreply.github.com> |
| license | MIT |
| description | Audit cross-document coherence: docs ↔ roadmap ↔ code ↔ fix index ↔ issues. Finds drift — features in docs/ not in the roadmap (or vice versa), fix-index entries already merged/closed, broken documentation-map links, dependency cycles, artifacts in the wrong language, naming-convention violations — and reports them ranked by severity, fixing only low-risk items on request. On Claude Code and want hand-tuned per-skill model/effort tiers? Install the `#claude` branch instead (`npx skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow#claude`) — see the README. This branch is model-agnostic: the skill inherits whatever model and effort your agent session is already using. Triggers: "check doc consistency", "are the docs in sync", "audit the docs", "doc coherence review", "did the docs drift", "validate the roadmap".
|
Audit Docs
A read-first audit answering "do the docs still match reality?" Produces a
findings report; it does not silently rewrite docs.
Turn contract — verify before ending the turn
✓ The AUDIT DOCS fixed-format report was printed, ending in `Decision: PASS | FAIL`
✓ No doc was rewritten without explicit --fix / user go-ahead
✓ The closing `→ Next:` block is printed as the ABSOLUTE last output
About to end the turn with any box unchecked? The turn is NOT done — complete
the missing box first (weak models drop end-of-document duties; this list is
first on purpose).
When to use
- Before a release or milestone, after merging several features/fixes, or
whenever the doc set might have drifted from the code and issues.
Step 0 — Discover the project (always first)
Per the agent guide's Workflow conventions + documentation map, then read
what THIS skill needs: the roadmap, the fix index + template, and the feature
folder layout — the map tells you which links and invariants to check.
Checks
Run these and collect findings (cite paths/lines/issue numbers each):
- Roadmap ↔ feature folders. Every
docs/features/<NN>-<slug>/ is in the
roadmap, and every roadmap entry has a folder (or is explicitly "scheduled").
- Feature dependencies. SPEC
Depends on / Branch fields are valid; no
dependency cycles; ordering is consistent with the roadmap.
- Fix index hygiene. Every entry maps to an open issue and an unmerged
branch; flag entries whose issue is closed or whose PR merged (should have
been removed). Flag open fix branches missing from the index.
- Documentation-map links resolve. Every file the map references exists;
flag "scheduled, not yet authored" items so they aren't mistaken for drift.
- Broken intra-doc links. Relative links/anchors point at real
files/sections.
- Issue references. Acceptance/known-issues lines referencing
#N aren't
pointing at long-closed issues without note.
- Language & naming conventions. Artifacts in the project's docs language
(this repo: English); file/dir naming matches conventions (e.g.
kebab-case TS files, PascalCase components).
- Invariant tags. If the project uses invariant/decision IDs (e.g.
INV-/D-/KI-), spot-check that referenced IDs exist where claimed.
- PR-link integrity on
done rows. Every roadmap row (and fix-index
entry) with status done carries a linked PR reference —
done · [#<pr>](<pr-url>). For each bare done, find its PR in the forge
(gh pr list --state all --head feat/<NN>-<slug> or by title) and propose
the row update; a done with no PR found at all is HIGH severity (the unit
may never have been closed out).
Workflow discipline (checks 10–14) — the executor skills enforce these at
write time; this audit verifies they actually held. Each check is mechanical:
run the command shown, don't infer.
- Phase naming.
grep -rnE '\bS[0-9]+\b|\bStep [0-9]' docs/features/*/{PLAN,TASKS,progress}.md
must return nothing — plans use P1, P2, … ("phases") only. Any hit: LOW
(rename), plus check the executor argument still resolves.
- Per-phase doc discipline. For every M/L feature
in-progress/done:
completed phases are ticked in TASKS.md, progress.md has one entry per
completed phase, and (features planned under the current template) the
final phase ends with the literal close-out tasks (open PR + print URL,
link roadmap row, push the link commit). A done feature with unticked
tasks or a phase missing from progress.md: HIGH.
- Branch & PR discipline vs the forge. For every
done unit: its PR
exists, targets the default branch, has a non-empty body, and carries
Closes #<n> when the unit is issue-born (SPEC references an issue).
Also scan recent default-branch history (git log --first-parent) for
feature/fix-scoped changes committed directly without a PR: HIGH.
- Generated-docs provenance (only when the documentation map declares a
Docs site block; otherwise state n/a). Scan the declared content dir
for pages carrying generated-by: agentic-workflow/generate-docs. For
each: (a) its source-unit exists in the roadmap or fix index — no match
is an orphan (MEDIUM: propose deletion or re-attribution); (b) the
unit's PR merged after the page's updated date with commits touching
the page's subject paths — that page is stale (LOW: propose
/generate-docs <unit> to refresh). Cite page path + unit per finding.
- Commit format & dependency discipline. Sample the unit branches'
commits:
<type>(<scope>): <summary> conventional format (violations:
LOW). Every in-progress/done row's Depends on: closure was merged —
a unit built on unmerged deps is HIGH unless decisions.md records a
user-forced override (--force), which downgrades it to LOW (documented
risk).
Adapt the list to what the project has; skip checks for absent structures and
say so.
Process
-
Discover, then run the checks with grep, file reads, and the forge CLI
(per Workflow conventions; examples use gh).
-
Produce the findings report — return exactly (fixed output contract):
AUDIT DOCS — scope: <docs tree / roadmap / fix index / issues checked>
| # | Check (1-13) | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Proposed fix |
|---|-------------|---------|-----|----------|--------------|
| 1 | <which> | <what> | high|low | <path:line / #issue> | <smallest action> |
Checks run: <n>/13 (skipped: <which + why — absent structures only>)
Summary: <1-2 sentences>
Decision: PASS | FAIL (FAIL if any high-severity finding is open)
Sev: high = misleading or broken; low = cosmetic.
-
Fix only on request. With explicit --fix (or user go-ahead), apply the
low-risk corrections (remove a merged fix-index row, fix a dead link, register
a missing roadmap entry, add a verified PR link to a bare done row). Leave judgment calls to the user.
Guardrails
- Read-first; never bulk-rewrite docs unprompted.
- Distinguish genuine drift from intentionally "scheduled/deferred" items —
don't report deliberate tradeoffs as errors.
- Keep changes surgical and within docs; no code or behavior changes.
Portability (agents other than Claude Code)
The workflow is the contract; Claude Code features are conveniences. On an
agent that lacks one, apply the fallback — never skip the step the feature
enables:
- No slash-command menu — where this skill says
/<skill>, open that
skill's SKILL.md (wherever your agent installed the skills) and follow it
literally, in a fresh conversation: hand-offs assume a clean context.
- No per-skill
model:/effort: — on the #claude branch the frontmatter pins these tiers; here, pick tiers yourself:
these are mostly mechanical cross-document checks — a mid-tier model is
enough; escalate to your strongest only for a deep audit.
Relationship to other skills
- Complements
plan-feature (which creates the docs this audits) and
triage-issue (which keeps the fix index honest).
- Run standalone anytime; no required predecessor.
Done when
-
A severity-ranked findings report exists, and any approved low-risk fixes are
applied — with genuine deferrals left untouched and labeled as such.
-
The closing → Next: block is printed:
→ Next: apply the approved low-risk fixes, then re-run /audit-docs to confirm clean
· real drift (not cosmetic) → /triage-issue · a concrete defect → /plan-fix
· already clean → nothing to do