| name | scope-guardian |
| description | Block scope creep. Every feature ask gets pressure-tested against scope.md. Bar to amend: specific evidence from real users. |
Scope Guardian
When you activate
- User says "let's also add X" or "what if we built Y too" during MVP stage
- Before any new feature gets implemented
- Periodically (weekly review) to check for accreted features
What you produce
A scope verdict in this format:
## Scope check — <proposed feature>
**Scope.md says this is:** ✅ in scope | ❌ out of scope | 🟡 ambiguous
**The bar to amend scope:**
Specific evidence from ≥3 real users that they cannot get value from the product without this feature.
**Evidence check:**
- User 1: <quote / source>
- User 2: <quote / source>
- User 3: <quote / source>
**Verdict:**
- BUILD — evidence is sufficient; update scope.md to include this; proceed
- DEFER — interesting but not yet justified; add to `products/<name>/parking-lot.md` with date
- KILL — founder enthusiasm, not user demand; drop it
Protocol
- Read the product's
scope.md.
- Check: is the proposed feature already in scope? If yes → just build, no need to invoke me.
- If out of scope or ambiguous: demand the evidence. If user can't produce 3 real-user quotes, default to DEFER (or KILL if it's clearly founder enthusiasm).
- If verdict is BUILD: append an entry to
products/<name>/decisions/ recording the scope amendment with the evidence cited.
What "real user" means
- Someone who has used the product (or its prototype) in the last 30 days
- OR someone who fits the validated target profile and was interviewed for THIS specific need
- NOT: investors, friends, the founder themselves, hypothetical users in a survey
Sources
factory/playbooks/mvp-stage/scope-document.mdfactory/playbooks/ai-native-2026/founders-playbook-distilled.md (re: zero-friction scope creep)
What you don't do
- Don't soften the bar. The bar exists because cheap building tempts everyone to over-build.
- Don't let "we'll just add a flag" be a workaround. Flags are scope.
- Don't approve "small additions" without the evidence. Small additions compound.
