Use when writing academic theses or dissertations (Master's, PhD, undergraduate honors). Covers chapter-by-chapter structure, literature review chapters, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, front matter, and thesis-specific conventions including abstract, acknowledgements, appendices, and institutional formatting requirements.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
Use when writing academic theses or dissertations (Master's, PhD, undergraduate honors). Covers chapter-by-chapter structure, literature review chapters, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, front matter, and thesis-specific conventions including abstract, acknowledgements, appendices, and institutional formatting requirements.
allowed-tools
["Read","Write","Edit","Bash"]
Thesis Writing
Overview
This skill guides the writing of academic theses and dissertations—Master's (MSc/MA), doctoral (PhD/DPhil), and undergraduate honors—combining rigorous structure with depth of argumentation appropriate for degree-level assessment.
Core principle: A thesis is an extended argument. Every chapter, section, and paragraph must advance the central thesis statement. Use a two-stage process: first build section outlines informed by Zotero literature search, then convert to flowing scholarly prose.
Critical: Write in full paragraphs with flowing academic prose. Never submit bullet points in the final document. Use claude-scientific-writer:zotero-research-lookup for all literature-based evidence gathering—it uses the advanced_rag semantic search mode for high-quality chunk-level retrieval from your Zotero library.
Thesis vs. Journal Paper: Key Differences
Dimension
Journal Paper
Thesis/Dissertation
Length
4,000–10,000 words
20,000–100,000+ words
Audience
Field specialists
Examining committee + future researchers
Literature review
Focused, selective
Comprehensive, critically synthesized
Methods
Summarized
Fully reproducible detail
Original contribution
One contribution
Multiple or one substantial contribution
Voice
Impersonal
Often first-person acceptable
Chapter structure
IMRAD
Extended multi-chapter format
Standard Thesis Chapter Structure
Front Matter
Title page — title, author, institution, degree, date
Abstract — 200–500 words (standalone summary; state gap, approach, findings, contribution)
Acknowledgements — brief personal and funding acknowledgements
Table of contents, list of figures, list of tables, list of abbreviations
Declaration / statement of originality
Core Chapters
Chapter 1 — Introduction
Research context and significance
Problem statement and research gap (use zotero-research-lookup to document gap)
Research questions or hypotheses (numbered, specific)
Organize by research question, not by data collection order
Tables and figures with full captions (self-explanatory)
No interpretation here (save for Discussion)
Chapter 5 — Discussion
Interpret findings in light of research questions
Compare with existing literature (use zotero-research-lookup to find relevant papers)
Theoretical and practical implications
Limitations and their impact
Unexpected findings
Chapter 6 — Conclusion
Restate contribution(s) to knowledge
Answer each research question directly
Recommendations for practice and future research
Final reflective statement on significance
Back Matter
References / Bibliography (use institutional or field-standard style)
Appendices (instruments, raw data summaries, ethics approval, supplementary analyses)
Chapter 2 In-Depth: Literature Review
The literature review chapter is the most research-intensive part of the thesis. It demonstrates mastery of the field and justifies the research gap.
Structure Options
Thematic structure (most common): Group literature by theme, concept, or theoretical strand—not chronologically.
Funnel structure: Move from broad field → sub-field → specific gap → your study.
Conceptual framework section: End the chapter with a conceptual or theoretical framework diagram (text-based description) that organizes the key constructs your study will examine.
Two-Stage Writing Process for Literature Review
Stage 1 — Build evidence outline using zotero-research-lookup:
For each thematic section:
Invoke claude-scientific-writer:zotero-research-lookup with a targeted semantic query
The skill uses advanced_rag mode: it retrieves chunk-level matches with reranking, returning matched text passages alongside metadata—ideal for extracting specific claims from PDFs
Cite primary sources; avoid secondary citations where primary is accessible
In literature review, cite multiple studies per claim to show breadth
Paragraph Architecture
Each paragraph should follow:
Topic sentence — states the paragraph's argument
Evidence — 2–4 cited pieces of support
Analysis — your interpretation connecting evidence to the argument
Transition — links to the next paragraph or signals conclusion
Transitions Between Chapters
Every chapter should end with a brief chapter summary (3–5 sentences) and a transition sentence pointing to the next chapter's purpose.
Citation Styles by Discipline
Discipline
Style
Sciences (biology, chemistry, physics)
Vancouver or APA 7
Social sciences, psychology, education
APA 7
Humanities (history, literature)
Chicago Notes-Bibliography
Engineering, computer science
IEEE
Law
Jurisdiction-specific (Bluebook, OSCOLA)
Business, economics
Harvard / APA
Always verify the exact style required by your institution and department.
Common Thesis Writing Mistakes
Mistake
Fix
Literature review as annotated bibliography
Synthesize across sources; organize thematically
Methodology without philosophical grounding
State research paradigm before design choices
Results mixed with interpretation
Keep results objective; interpretation belongs in Discussion
Weak conclusion that just summarizes
State explicit contribution to knowledge; answer each RQ
Inconsistent tense
Methods/results: past tense; established facts: present tense
Single-source paragraphs
Integrate 2–4 sources per paragraph in lit review
Thesis statement buried or absent
State research gap + approach + contribution in Introduction clearly
Ignoring counter-evidence
Engage with contradictory findings; show critical thinking
Workflow: Writing a Thesis Chapter
1. PLAN
- Identify chapter purpose and its argument
- List research questions this chapter addresses
2. SEARCH (for each thematic section)
- Invoke zotero-research-lookup with targeted query
- If results are empty or irrelevant → fall back to semantic-scholar-lookup
- Collect evidence scaffold as bullet points
3. OUTLINE
- Arrange bullet points into logical paragraph groups
- Identify gaps → run additional searches
4. DRAFT
- Convert each bullet group to a full paragraph (topic + evidence + analysis + transition)
- Write in full prose; no bullet points in final output
5. REVIEW
- Does each paragraph advance the chapter argument?
- Are citations integrated (not listed)?
- Is tense consistent?
- Does the chapter end with a summary and transition?
Integration with Other Skills
claude-scientific-writer:zotero-research-lookup — REQUIRED for all literature-based sections; use advanced_rag for chunk-level precision
claude-scientific-writer:semantic-scholar-lookup — fallback when Zotero returns empty or insufficient results; searches the open Semantic Scholar corpus
claude-scientific-writer:zotero-deep-research — use for iterative multi-round research on complex topics requiring gap analysis
claude-scientific-writer:literature-review — complements Chapter 2 with systematic search protocols and PRISMA-style documentation
claude-scientific-writer:venue-templates — for formatting theses to institutional LaTeX templates
claude-scientific-writer:citation-management — for verifying and generating accurate BibTeX entries
Do not use image generation skills (scientific-schematics, generate-image) unless the thesis specifically requires custom diagrams—most theses use data-generated figures produced by the researcher's own analysis tools.
