skill-creator

name	skill-creator
description	Structured workflow for creating or updating skills — from discovery through validation and audit. Produces structurally correct, behaviorally effective skill packages (SKILL.md + companions) using deep-plan-style discovery with skill-specific question categories and convergence-loop verification of codebase claims.
compatibility	agentskills-v1
metadata	{"version":3.4}

Skill Creator

Structured creation workflow that produces high-quality skills by front-loading decision-making through exhaustive discovery. Effectiveness is measured against the quality checklist in SKILL_STANDARDS.md.

Critical Rules (MUST follow)

1. Discovery before writing — MUST complete discovery and planning before writing any skill files. No skipping ahead.
2. Approval gate before scaffold — MUST present planning output to user and get explicit approval before creating files.
3. Skill-audit is mandatory — MUST run /skill-audit on every created skill before considering it complete.
4. Under 300 lines — created SKILL.md MUST stay under 300 lines. Extract to REFERENCE.md if approaching the limit.
5. MUST/SHOULD/MAY on every instruction — every instruction in created skills MUST be classifiable as MUST, SHOULD, or MAY.
6. Persist state incrementally — save to state file after every phase. Long creation sessions WILL hit compaction.
7. Recommend with rationale — at every decision point, state your recommendation and explain WHY.

When to Use

• Creating a new skill from scratch
• Updating or improving an existing skill (major changes)
• User explicitly invokes /skill-creator

When NOT to Use

• Auditing an existing skill's quality — use /skill-audit
• Creating an audit-type skill — use /create-audit
• Checking all skills for issues — use /skill-ecosystem-audit
• Quick structural check — use npm run skills:validate

What This Skill Does NOT Do

• Ecosystem-wide analysis (use /skill-ecosystem-audit)
• Structural validation only (use npm run skills:validate)
• Behavioral quality evaluation (use /skill-audit)
• Audit-specific scaffolding (use /create-audit)

Routing Guide

Situation	Use	Why
Create new skill	/skill-creator	Full discovery + planning
Improve existing skill	/skill-audit first	Audit identifies what to fix
Create audit-type skill	/create-audit	Specialized audit scaffolding
Check all skills	/skill-ecosystem-audit	Ecosystem-wide analysis
Quick structural check	npm run skills:validate	Fast, no AI needed

Input

Argument: Skill name or description, passed as /skill-creator <name> or in conversation context.

Output location: .claude/skills/<skill-name>/ (MUST — user-created skills go here, not in vendor directories).

Complexity Tiers

Tier	Characteristics	Process
Simple	Reference-only, <50 lines, no companions	Skip discovery, write directly
Standard	Workflow, 50-200 lines, 0-2 companions	Full process
Complex	Multi-phase, 200-300 lines, 3+ companions	Full process + enhanced planning

---

Process Overview

WARM-UP    Orientation    -> Skill name, process, effort estimate, welcome
PHASE 1    Context        -> ROADMAP check, neighbor scan, existing patterns
PHASE 2    Discovery      -> Exhaustive questions (6 categories, floor ~12)
PHASE 3    Planning       -> Decision record + skill structure plan + approval
PHASE 4    Build          -> Scaffold, write SKILL.md + companions
PHASE 5    Validate       -> Structural + behavioral checklist
PHASE 6    Audit          -> Run /skill-audit on created skill
PHASE 7    Closure        -> Retro, invocation tracking, session cleanup

Use phase markers: ======== PHASE N: [NAME] ========

---

Warm-Up (MUST)

Present before any work: skill name, process overview, complexity tier estimate, effort estimate (Simple: 10min, Standard: 30min, Complex: 60min+).

"Before we start: any specific concerns, constraints, or existing patterns you want this skill to follow?"

Done when: User confirms proceed.

---

Phase 1: Context Gathering (MUST)

1. Check ROADMAP.md — verify skill aligns with project direction (MUST). If misaligned: present conflict, offer proceed/reframe/abort. Do NOT silently proceed.
2. Scan .claude/skills/ for existing neighbors (MUST)
3. Check CLAUDE.md for relevant conventions (MUST)
4. Extraction context (MUST): Scan .research/EXTRACTIONS.md for candidates relevant to the skill being created (human-readable, grouped by source). For targeted filtering, query .research/extraction-journal.jsonl (match by type, tags in notes, or source domain). If matches found, present as "Prior art from analyzed sources" — these are patterns, architectures, and design principles already identified from external repos/websites that may inform the skill's design.
5. Read existing skill files if updating (MUST for updates)
6. Domain research check (SHOULD) — if the skill being created covers a domain the AI lacks expertise in (unfamiliar technology, specialized workflow, external ecosystem), suggest: "This skill targets a domain that would benefit from research. Run /deep-research first to understand the landscape?" Prior research at .research/<topic-slug>/ feeds directly into better discovery questions and informed defaults in Phase 2.

Reframe path: If context reveals the user doesn't need a skill — they need a hook, script, CLAUDE.md entry, or agent — present the reframe before proceeding.

Done when: Context gathered, no ROADMAP conflict (or conflict resolved).

---

Phase 2: Discovery (MUST for Standard/Complex, skip for Simple)

Read .claude/skills/skill-creator/REFERENCE.md for the 6 question categories with example questions.

Discovery Rules (MUST follow)

1. Floor of ~12 questions, no ceiling — ask until ambiguity is resolved
2. Front-load critical decisions — scope, architecture, neighbors first
3. Offer defaults for every question — "I recommend X because Y. Override?"
4. Reference existing patterns — cite actual codebase skills, not generics
5. Batch 4-6 related questions — group by category, critical first
6. Inter-batch synthesis — summarize learnings before next batch
7. State inferences explicitly — "Based on Q3, inferring X for Q7"
8. Save decisions with rationale after every batch (MUST) — persist to state file, include WHY per decision
9. Show progress — "Batch 2 of ~3. N decisions captured."
10. Multi-agent exploration (SHOULD for Complex) — dispatch Explore agents to scan the codebase for relevant patterns before presenting questions. Findings inform defaults and recommendations.
11. Cross-batch revision (MUST) — if a later batch answer conflicts with an earlier decision, present the conflict and allow revision. Update state file with the revised decision.
12. Self-audit design (MUST for Standard/Complex) — discovery MUST include questions about the created skill's self-audit phase. See REFERENCE.md Category 2 for the self-audit design questions.

Delegation: If user says "you decide," accept recommended defaults. Document each delegated decision with rationale.

Contradiction detection: If answers conflict, flag immediately: "Decision N said X, but this implies Y. Which takes priority?"

Mid-discovery check (MUST after batch 2): "Discovery progress: N questions, M decisions. Estimated ~K more. Continue or scope-reduce?"

Post-discovery prompt (MUST): "Discovery complete. Anything the questions didn't cover, or concerns before we plan?"

Done when: All 6 categories covered, no remaining ambiguity, user confirms nothing missing.

---

Phase 3: Planning + Approval (MUST)

1. Compile decision record — one row per decision, choice + rationale (MUST)
2. Present skill structure plan (MUST):
   • Files to create (SKILL.md, REFERENCE.md, scripts/, etc.)
   • Section outline for SKILL.md
   • Guard rails and failure modes
   • Integration surface (neighbors, handoffs)
   • Compaction resilience design
   • Self-audit phase design (MUST for Standard/Complex) — list expected output artifacts to verify, verification agents to dispatch, orphan detection scope, and downstream contract checks. Reference SKILL_STANDARDS.md "Self-Audit at Completion" for the 9 dimensions.
3. Present for approval (MUST): "Here's the planned structure. Proceed? [approve / approve with changes / reject]"

Revision: If writing later reveals a planning decision was wrong, pause, note the revision, confirm with user before continuing.

Done when: User approves plan.

---

Phase 4: Build (MUST)

4.1 Input Validation (MUST)

Validate skill name: lowercase-kebab-case, no spaces, max 40 chars. Check .claude/skills/ for existing skill. If exists and malformed, offer repair or fresh start.

4.2 Scaffold

Run init_skill.py <name> --path .claude/skills for new skills. Skip for updates.

4.3 Write SKILL.md

Read REFERENCE.md for the full content checklist (MUST/SHOULD items).

Structure for attention management:

1. Top third (1-100): Critical rules, MUST behaviors, process overview
2. Middle third (100-200): Step-by-step procedures, checklists
3. Bottom third (200-300): Guard rails, compaction, version history

Point-of-use reminders (MUST):

• Repeat "under 300 lines" in the validation phase
• Repeat "MUST/SHOULD/MAY" where instructions are written
• Repeat "front-load critical rules" in the writing phase

Project conventions: Reference CLAUDE.md by path. Do NOT duplicate conventions into the skill.

Data standards: If skill produces data files, SHOULD use JSONL as canonical format with .md for human readability.

Convergence-loop integration (SHOULD): If Phase 2 discovery identified a discovery or verification phase in the skill being created (T25 question), wire convergence-loop programmatic mode into that phase. Reference /convergence-loop SKILL.md "Programmatic Mode" section for the integration contract.

Self-audit phase (MUST for Standard/Complex): Two parts.

1. Prose phase in SKILL.md — write a self-audit phase as the penultimate phase (before Closure). Reference SKILL_STANDARDS.md "Self-Audit at Completion" for the 9 verification dimensions. Customize with the skill's specific deliverables, downstream contracts, and regression detection needs from Phase 3 planning.
2. Scaffold the script — create scripts/skills/<skill-name>/self-audit.js per SELF_AUDIT_PATTERN.md. Use scripts/skills/skill-audit/self-audit.js as the template and replace domain-specific dimension checks. The Phase 5 prose in SKILL.md MUST invoke this script first (per pattern doc §Wiring to SKILL.md Phase 5), with prose handling judgment-only checks afterwards.

If skill is Simple tier (<50 lines, reference-only), skip both parts — the "Done when:" gate is sufficient per SKILL_STANDARDS.md.

4.4 Write Companions (SHOULD)

Extract to REFERENCE.md if SKILL.md approaches 300 lines. Move examples, templates, question banks to companion files.

Done when: All files written, content checklist addressed.

---

Phase 5: Validate (MUST)

1. Run npm run skills:validate (MUST) — structural check

2. Walk the content checklist from REFERENCE.md (MUST) — for each unchecked item, either address it or document why not applicable

3. Convergence-loop verify (MUST for Complex, SHOULD for Standard) — verify created skill's codebase claims (neighbors, integration points, existing patterns) via convergence-loop quick preset. Skip if skill makes no codebase claims. If claims are wrong: fix in created skill files (Phase 4 re-entry) before continuing validation.

4. Verify line count under 300 (MUST)

5. Verify cross-references resolve (SHOULD)

6. Evidence-based self-check (MUST) — re-read all created files. For each planning decision from Phase 3, grep the output file for a keyword proving implementation. Decisions with no grep match are MISSING — fix before proceeding to Phase 6. See SKILL_STANDARDS.md "Self-Audit at Completion."

7. Self-audit phase present (MUST for Standard/Complex) — verify both: (a) SKILL.md includes a self-audit phase positioned as penultimate, referencing SKILL_STANDARDS.md dimensions appropriate to tier; (b) scripts/skills/<name>/self-audit.js exists and follows SELF_AUDIT_PATTERN.md (matching CLI shape, exit codes, SUMMARY block, required helpers).

8. Contract verification wired (MUST if downstream consumers) — verify the self-audit checks output against documented consumer expectations

Done when: skills:validate passes, behavioral checklist addressed, under 300 lines, codebase claims verified, all decisions grep-verified, self-audit phase present (Standard/Complex).

---

Phase 6: Audit (MUST)

Run /skill-audit <skill-name> on the created skill. The audit verifies behavioral quality that structural validation cannot catch.

Done when: Skill-audit complete, findings addressed.

Phase 7: Closure (MUST)

1. Closure signal (MUST): List all created/modified files with paths
2. Retro prompt (MUST): "What did discovery surface that you didn't expect? What did the checklist catch? What would you do differently?" Capture in state file process_feedback.
3. Session cleanup (SHOULD): Commit created skill files. State file retained as creation record. Run /session-end if ending session.
4. Version history (MUST): WHAT changed + WHY in every entry.

---

Guard Rails

• Contradiction: Flag conflicting requirements immediately
• Scope explosion: If planned skill exceeds 300 lines + 3 companions + 5 scripts, pause: "This is growing large. Split into multiple skills?"
• Phase gates: MUST complete Phase 1 before Phase 2. MUST have approved plan (Phase 3) before Phase 4.
• Disengagement: If user stops mid-skill, save state, list files created, offer cleanup (delete partial work or keep for later)

Anti-Patterns

Read REFERENCE.md "Anti-Patterns" section for the full 12-item list of common skill creation mistakes (MUST check during Phase 4 Build).

Compaction Resilience

• State file: .claude/state/skill-creator.state.json
• Update: After every phase boundary and every discovery batch
• Contents: Skill name, discovery decisions, planning checklist, current phase, files created, process feedback
• Recovery: Re-invoke /skill-creator <skill-name> to read state and resume
• Retention: State file retained after completion as creation record and artifact contract for /skill-audit handoff

Integration

• Neighbors: /skill-audit (audit created skill), /skill-ecosystem-audit (check all skills), /create-audit (audit-specific scaffolding), /convergence-loop (Phase 4.3: wire into created skill if T25 applies; Phase 5: verify created skill's codebase claims)
• References: SKILL_STANDARDS.md (Phase 5 content checklist), SELF_AUDIT_PATTERN.md (Phase 4.3 scaffold + Phase 5 verification), SKILL_AGENT_POLICY.md
• Handoff: State file documents intent + discovery decisions for skill-audit

---

Version History

Version	Date	Description
3.4	2026-04-14	Phase 4.3 + 5.7: scaffold + verify scripts/skills//self-audit.js per pattern
3.3	2026-04-04	Add mandatory self-audit phase for Standard/Complex skills (9 dimensions)
3.2	2026-03-15	Skill-audit: CL verify MUST for Complex, reorder Phase 5, anti-patterns to REFERENCE
3.1	2026-03-15	Convergence-loop integration: Phase 4.3 build + Phase 5 verify
3.0	2026-03-08	Full rewrite from 52-decision audit (48/100 -> target 82/100)
2.2	2026-03-07	SC-1..5: operational deps, compaction MUST, scope, recommendations
2.1	2026-03-06	Add interactive design, verification phase, UX
2.0	2026-02-28	Add attention management, behavioral quality, guards
1.0	2026-02-25	Initial implementation (Anthropic skill, Apache 2.0)