| name | create-roadmap |
| description | Create a Now/Next/Later outcome-oriented roadmap when the user asks to plan a roadmap, prioritize features, or define product direction |
| author | chalk |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| metadata-version | 3 |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Write |
| argument-hint | [product area or theme to roadmap] |
| read-only | false |
| destructive | false |
| idempotent | false |
| open-world | false |
| user-invocable | true |
| tags | product, roadmap, planning |
Create Roadmap
Overview
Generate a Now/Next/Later roadmap where every item ties to a measurable outcome, not just a feature name. This format communicates strategic intent without false precision on dates, and forces prioritization by time horizon and confidence level.
Workflow
-
Read product context -- Scan .chalk/docs/product/ for the product profile, PRDs, JTBD docs, and metrics frameworks. Check .chalk/docs/engineering/ for architecture constraints and tech debt items. These inform what is feasible and what matters.
-
Parse scope -- Extract from $ARGUMENTS the product area, theme, or time horizon to roadmap. If unspecified, create a full-product roadmap using all available context.
-
Determine the next file number -- Read filenames in .chalk/docs/product/ to find the highest numbered file. The next number is highest + 1.
-
Categorize items into time horizons:
- Now (current cycle, high confidence): Actively being built or about to start. Clear problem definition, validated need, committed resources.
- Next (1-2 cycles out, medium confidence): Problem is understood, solution is taking shape, not yet committed.
- Later (future, low confidence): Strategic bets, exploration areas, things that depend on learning from Now/Next.
-
Write each item with columns: Item, Outcome (measurable result), Confidence (high/medium/low), Dependencies (what must be true or done first).
-
Add strategic context -- Above the roadmap table, write a brief narrative explaining the strategic themes connecting the items and what the roadmap is optimizing for.
-
Write the file -- Save to .chalk/docs/product/<n>_roadmap.md.
-
Confirm -- Share the file path and highlight any items with unresolved dependencies or low confidence that need validation.
Output
- File:
.chalk/docs/product/<n>_roadmap.md
- Format: Plain markdown with strategic narrative and Now/Next/Later tables
- First line:
# Roadmap: <Product Area or Theme>
Anti-patterns
- Feature lists without outcomes -- "Add filtering" is not a roadmap item. "Users can find records in <10 seconds (reduce support tickets by 30%)" ties the work to value.
- Dates on everything -- Now/Next/Later intentionally avoids specific dates for Next and Later items. Adding dates to low-confidence items creates false promises.
- No dependencies called out -- Roadmap items without dependencies hide sequencing risks. If B requires A, say so.
- Confidence theater -- Marking everything as "high confidence" defeats the purpose. Be honest about what is validated versus what is a bet.
- Solution-shaped items -- "Build GraphQL API" belongs in an engineering plan, not a product roadmap. Roadmap items should describe user or business outcomes.