contextualize

name

contextualize

description

Detect application-context mismatch after execution. Verifies applicability when correct output may not fit the actual context, registering each mismatch through a fail-closed deficit-fit certificate before adaptation, producing contextualized execution. The transformative revalidation loop is non-monotone — adapting the result mutates the evaluation target and can breed emergent mismatches; re-scan is mandatory. This is the non-monotone/transformative side of the contextualize ↔ distill boundary (distill is the claim-preserving side: it may add resolution or excise released bookkeeping in place, but never mutates what the record asserts). Type: (ApplicationDecontextualized, AI, CONTEXTUALIZE, Result) → ContextualizedExecution. Alias: Epharmoge(ἐφαρμογή).

Epharmoge Protocol

Detect application-context mismatch after execution through AI-guided applicability verification, where correct results that may not fit the actual context are surfaced for user judgment. Type: (ApplicationDecontextualized, AI, CONTEXTUALIZE, Result) → ContextualizedExecution.

Definition

Epharmoge (ἐφαρμογή): A dialogical act of verifying that results fit the actual application context — from Aristotle's notion of practical application — resolving the gap between technical correctness and contextual appropriateness through structured mismatch surfacing and user-directed adaptation.

── FLOW ──
Epharmoge(R, X) → Eval(R, X) → Mᵢ? →
  Mᵢ = ∅: Qc(zero_mismatch_finding) → Stop → [Confirm: deactivate (no aspect ¬warranted; execution stands as-is) | Reopen(aspect): reopen_focus := aspect, re-scan Eval focused on it (one attempt: still-∅ → relay finding, deactivate)]
  Mᵢ ≠ ∅: ∀m ∈ Mᵢ: bind_kind(m) → certify(m, registry) → keep(status = pass) → Mᵢ_passed →
    Mᵢ_passed = ∅ ∧ no deferred-pending ∧ adjudicated(R, X) (every flagged aspect resolved to ROUTED or TERMINAL-RESIDUAL via the typed routed(a)/terminal_residual(a) predicates — deferred mismatches first get their one bounded re-assessment to pass→registered, route→Λ.routed, or terminal-residual→Λ.residual): → emit routing recommendations + surface any terminal-residual (each flagged aspect either routed to a sibling deficit or terminal-residual/unattributable) → deactivate (trivial convergence: adjudicated by routing/terminal-residual, R unadapted)
    Mᵢ_passed ≠ ∅: AssessFit(R, X, Mᵢ_passed) → F → Register(Mᵢ_passed) → SelectNext(pending, F, Σ) → Mₛ → Q(F-scoped Mₛ) → A →[mutating: A ∈ {Confirm, Adapt}] adapt → R' → Eval(R', X) → Mₑ? (Dismiss: R' := R, no re-scan, no Mₑ) → ∀m ∈ Mₑ: bind_kind(m) → certify(m, registry) → keep(status = pass) → Mₑ_passed → Register(Mₑ_passed) → AssessFit(R', X, pending) → F' → (loop: SelectNext → Q → A → adapt → re-scan until contextualized)

── MORPHISM ──
(R, X)
  → evaluate(result, context)          -- detect applicability mismatch
  → bind_kind(mismatch) → certify(mismatch, registry) -- shared meta-backbone: bind each mismatch as a kind, certify deficit fit (fail-closed) at REGISTRATION, BEFORE it enters the pending/adaptation flow
  → assess_fit(result, context, mismatches) -- sort applicability fit before user judgment
  → surface(fit_scoped_mismatch, as_inquiry) -- present mismatch with fit basis and evidence
  → adapt(result, direction)           -- adapt result to context (transformative revalidation: mutates Eval target → may breed Mₑ)
  → ContextualizedExecution
requires: mismatch_detected(R, X)       -- runtime checkpoint (Phase 0)
deficit:  ApplicationDecontextualized    -- activation precondition (Layer 1/2); certificate.owner for in-scope mismatches
preserves: X                             -- application context is fixed reference; morphism transforms R only
invariant: Applicability over Correctness
invariant: certificate-before-registration  -- DeficitFitCertificate.status = pass strictly precedes registering a mismatch into pending(Σ) (shared meta-backbone order, at registration of both Mᵢ and Mₑ)
invariant: transformative revalidation (NON-MONOTONE) -- adapting R' mutates the Eval(R, X) target, breeding emergent mismatches Mₑ; re-scan mandatory; progress(Λ) may regress. Opposite of distill's claim-preserving side (distill may edit the record in place — adding resolution, excising released bookkeeping — but never mutates what it asserts; the contextualize ↔ distill boundary)

── TYPES ──
R      = Result to be evaluated (source-agnostic: AI output, analysis conclusion, decision outcome, or any completed work product)
           -- Input type: morphism processes R uniformly; enumeration scopes the definition, not behavioral dispatch
X      = Application context (environment, constraints, user situation)
Eval   = Applicability evaluation: (R, X) → Set(Mismatch)
Mismatch = { aspect: String, description: String, evidence: String, severity: Severity, origin: Origin, kind_binding: KindBinding, certificate: DeficitFitCertificate }
                 -- object_ref: the per-mismatch anchor the certificate evaluates and the value-space binds over (epharmoge-local instantiation of the shared backbone's object_ref)
                 -- the mismatch's kind/domain is carried by kind_binding.label (Axis = String, emergent); no separate dimension field (single source of the kind label)
Origin ∈ {Initial, Emerged(aspect)}                            -- mismatch provenance: initial scan or spawned by adapting parent aspect
Severity ∈ {Critical, Significant, Minor}                      -- Significant requires demonstrable behavioral impact (current-session task graph / downstream protocol activations); see Rule 12

-- Shared meta-backbone (KIND dispatch, registration-time / cycle-emergent). One canonical schema; epharmoge-local instantiation ONLY for object_ref (= Mismatch), local_value_space (= the answer coproduct {Confirm, Adapt, Dismiss}), and guard routing targets.
KindBinding    = { label: Axis, positive_predicate: String, evidence: Set(Evidence), origin ∈ {seed, emergent}, atomicity ∈ {atomic, non-atomic} }
                 -- captures the mismatch as a kind; if atomicity = non-atomic (the mismatch bundles two distinct aspects) → split BEFORE certify (no registration, no surfacing on a compound mismatch)
DeficitFitCertificate = { owner: Deficit, in_scope_if: String, route_if: List<RoutePair>, evidence: Set(Evidence), status ∈ {pass, route, ambiguous} }
                 -- fail-closed: status ≠ pass BLOCKS registration into pending(Σ) AND surfacing this mismatch for answer. Generated at registration time (Phase 0 for Mᵢ, Phase 2 re-scan for Mₑ) by fitting KindBinding.positive_predicate against the documented sibling-deficit scopes — each sibling protocol's deficit: declaration (its SKILL.md deficit: line), with the registered dependency graph supplying the deficit inventory (which sibling deficits exist as nodes; epharmoge has no outgoing routing edge, so the fit rests on the deficit-scope declarations, not on edge topology).
                 -- owner = ApplicationDecontextualized when the mismatch is in-scope; status = pass iff the mismatch's positive_predicate fits ApplicationDecontextualized and no sibling deficit claims it
                 -- status = route: a sibling deficit owns the mismatch (backward misfit) → emit RoutePair target, drop the mismatch from registration (it never enters pending(Σ))
                 -- status = ambiguous: overlapping deficit fit → defer the mismatch for ONE bounded re-assessment at the fixed detection state ((R, X) for Mᵢ at Phase 0, (R', X) for Mₑ at the Phase 2 re-scan; AI-side, no user interaction; Phase 0 stays silent for Mᵢ) → pass / route / terminal-residual; never register/surface under ambiguous fit
RoutePair      = (route_if_predicate: String, target: Protocol)
                 -- epharmoge-local guard routing targets — BACKWARD misfit the loop routes away rather than adapting in-place:
                 --   an unnoticed decision gap rather than a context-fit question        → /gap        (GapUnnoticed)
                 --   a missing pre-execution fact (no observable value, requires supply)  → /inquire    (ContextInsufficient)
                 --   undefined convention/dependency ownership for the decision           → /bound      (BoundaryUndefined)
                 --   portability to an absent zero-memory recipient (not present fit)      → /distill    (ContextTethered) -- the contextualize ↔ distill boundary guard
Evidence       = { source: ContextChannel, content: String }
ContextChannel ∈ {Result, Context, Convention, Environment, Session}  -- observable sources for the certificate's deficit-fit basis (R itself + observable X)
V              = bind_value_space : Mismatch → ValueSpace       -- the mismatch's answer constructors; generated ONLY after certificate.status = pass; frozen for the cycle (relay / dead-signal test applied)
ValueSpace     = the mismatch's answer coproduct (local_value_space; epharmoge-local instantiation point) = {Confirm, Adapt, Dismiss}
Deficit        = the sibling-deficit label a mismatch may belong to (sourced from each protocol's documented deficit: declaration; the protocol that OWNS the deficit is a node in the registered dependency graph and the deficit/edge relations are its edges — the deficit label itself is NOT a node of that graph); owner = ApplicationDecontextualized for in-scope mismatches
Protocol       = downstream protocol slash target a routed mismatch is handed to (e.g., /gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill)
Axis           = String                                        -- emergent kind label; examples: "convention", "environment", "audience", "dependency"
Mᵢ_passed = { m ∈ Mᵢ : certificate(m).status = pass }          -- initial mismatches that passed the fail-closed certificate at registration
Mₑ_passed = { m ∈ Mₑ : certificate(m).status = pass }          -- emerged mismatches that passed the fail-closed certificate at re-scan registration
AssessFit = Applicability fit assessment: R × X × Set(Mismatch) → F
           -- classifier over input_mismatches; does not generate new Mismatch objects
F      = ApplicabilityFitMap { fit_justifications, conflicts, depends, adaptation_options, open }
fit_justifications = Set(AspectFit) where aspect(R) is warranted in X
AspectFit = { aspect: String, evidence: String }
conflicts = Set(Mismatch) where evidence shows result behavior or meaning conflicts with X
           -- invariant: conflicts ⊆ input_mismatches
depends = Set(ContextCondition) where fitness hinges on an observable but unverified condition that could change adaptation or dismissal
ContextCondition = { target: Mismatch, condition: String, evidence: String, consequence: String }
                 -- invariant: target ∈ input_mismatches
adaptation_options = Set(AdaptationOption) where each option is tied to a conflict or dependency
AdaptationOption = { target: Mismatch ∪ ContextCondition, direction: String, effect: String }
open   = Set(ApplicabilityQuestion) where the answer could materially change the next adaptation judgment
ApplicabilityQuestion = { target: Mismatch, condition: String, reason: String, evidence_needed: String }
                       -- invariant: target ∈ input_mismatches
fit_category(m, F) =
  Conflict if m ∈ F.conflicts
  Dependent if ∃d ∈ F.depends : d.target = m
  Open if ∃q ∈ F.open : q.target = m
  Supported otherwise
FitRank = Conflict > Dependent > Open > Supported
SelectNext = Set(Mismatch) × F × Σ → Mₛ
           -- priority: severity(Critical > Significant > Minor), then FitRank, then oldest registered task
Mₛ     = Selected mismatch
Mᵢ     = Identified mismatches from Eval(R, X)                 -- origin = Initial; each bind_kind'd + certified at registration (Phase 0)
Mₑ     = Newly emerged mismatches from Eval(R', X)             -- origin = Emerged(adapted_aspect); each bind_kind'd + certified at re-scan registration (Phase 2)
Register = { m ∈ Set(Mismatch) : certificate(m).status = pass } → Set(Task) [Tool: TaskCreate] -- registration of ONLY certificate-passing mismatches as tracked tasks; status ≠ pass blocks registration (fail-closed)
pending(Σ) = Set(Mismatch) where registered task status ∉ {completed, dismissed}  -- a routed/ambiguous mismatch never enters pending(Σ); only certificate-passing mismatches are registered
Q      = Applicability inquiry over F-scoped mismatch (gate interaction)
A      = User answer ∈ {Confirm(mismatch), Adapt(direction), Dismiss}  -- A ∈ V; answer drawn from the mismatch's value-space (local_value_space = {Confirm, Adapt, Dismiss})
ZeroMismatchConfirmation = user's answer to a zero-mismatch finding ∈ {Confirm, Reopen(aspect)}  -- Confirm accepts the result as-is (Rule 9); Reopen names an aspect the Phase 0 scan missed, re-entering Eval focused on that aspect
R'     = Adapted result (contextualized output)
ContextualizedExecution = R' where (∀ task ∈ registered: task.status ∈ {completed, dismissed}) ∧ (Mᵢ = ∅ ⟹ zero-mismatch confirmation obtained: ZeroMismatchConfirmation = Confirm, or Reopen(aspect) whose focused re-scan still yields Mᵢ = ∅ → relay(finding) — Rule 9)
                 -- registered = certificate-passing mismatches only; routed/ambiguous mismatches are handed forward, not adapted in-place
EarlyExit = R' where user_esc  -- non-convergent early exit: result as of exit (adapted or not), partial trace over completed/dismissed tasks, remaining pending mismatches declared as unresolved residual

── PHASE TRANSITIONS ──
Phase 0: R → Eval(R, X) → Mᵢ? → ∀m ∈ Mᵢ: bind_kind(m) → certify(m, registry) → (status = pass) → Mᵢ_passed → AssessFit(R, X, Mᵢ_passed) → F → Λ.fit_map := F  -- applicability checkpoint + registration-time KIND dispatch (fail-closed) + fit map (silent); certify runs WITHIN Phase 0, at registration, not as a separate phase
Phase 0 → confirm_no_mismatch: Mᵢ = ∅ → Qc(zero_mismatch_finding) → Stop → ZeroMismatchConfirmation  -- true zero-mismatch case (distinct from the Mᵢ≠∅∧Mᵢ_passed=∅ trivial-convergence-by-routing case below); Confirm → R' := R, deactivate (execution stands as-is, Rule 9); Reopen(aspect) → reopen_focus := aspect → re-scan Eval focused on that aspect → reopen_focus := None (cleared after the focused re-scan, either arm); [Mᵢ ≠ ∅] re-enter the Phase 0 pipeline above (bind_kind → certify → Mᵢ_passed → AssessFit → F) and proceed to Phase 1; [Mᵢ still ∅] relay(finding) → R' := R, deactivate (one attempt per aspect) [Tool]
Phase 0 → route_away (mismatch-local): certify(m).status = route        -- a sibling deficit owns the mismatch (backward misfit) → emit RoutePair.target (/gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill), drop m from registration (m never enters pending(Σ)); scan continues with remaining mismatches
Phase 0 → split (pre-certify): KindBinding.atomicity = non-atomic  -- a compound mismatch bundles two distinct aspects → split into atomic sub-mismatches and re-run bind_kind + certify on each (same Phase 0 pass, before any pass/route/defer decision); recursive until atomic (well-founded: each split strictly decreases the number of bundled aspects — atomic = exactly one aspect — so the recursion terminates). A non-atomic mismatch is NEVER deferred or registered as a compound
Phase 0 → defer (mismatch-local): certify(m).status = ambiguous  -- overlapping deficit fit on an ATOMIC mismatch → ONE narrowed-scope re-assessment at the fixed Phase-0 (R, X) (AI-side, no user interaction — Phase 0 stays silent), then re-certify. (R, X) is fixed in Phase 0, so a re-assessment is deterministic-identical → the bound is ONE attempt: resolves to pass (→ registered), route (→ Λ.routed), or — if it STAYS ambiguous — TERMINAL-RESIDUAL: record m in Λ.residual (an unattributable mismatch: never registered into pending(Σ), adjudicated by terminal_residual(aspect(m)), surfaced as residual, non-blocking). deferred-pending therefore always clears (no Phase-0 loop)
Phase 0 → deactivate (no in-scope mismatch): Mᵢ ≠ ∅ ∧ Mᵢ_passed = ∅ ∧ adjudicated(R, X) ∧ no deferred-pending ∧ pending(Σ) = ∅  -- mismatches WERE detected but EVERY one resolved to ROUTED or TERMINAL-RESIDUAL (both typed CONVERGENCE disjuncts — routed(a): a ∈ Λ.routed; terminal_residual(a): a ∈ Λ.residual; via aspect(m) = a, NOT raw Mismatch-in-list membership) — no in-scope (ApplicationDecontextualized-owned) mismatch enters the adaptation loop → trivial convergence: emit the routing recommendations (/gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill) and deactivate without adapting R (R stands as-is for the in-scope check; contextualized(R) holds vacuously — adjudicated(R, X) with every aspect routed or terminal-residual). DEFERRED mismatches (atomic, status = ambiguous; a non-atomic mismatch is split pre-registration, never deferred) are NOT terminal and do NOT satisfy this path: they first get their ONE bounded re-assessment via Phase 0 → defer until each resolves to pass (→ registered into pending(Σ)), route (→ Λ.routed), or terminal-residual (still ambiguous at the fixed Phase-0 (R, X) → unattributable residual, excluded from pending(Σ), non-blocking); the bound (one re-assessment per mismatch, (R, X) fixed in Phase 0) guarantees deferred-pending always clears. Trivial convergence fires once NONE remain deferred-pending and every flagged aspect is routed or terminal-residual (none in-scope/pending). Distinct from the zero-mismatch-detected case (Mᵢ = ∅, no aspect ¬warranted): here aspects WERE flagged but all belong to sibling deficits. The per-mismatch-certificate analogue of elicit's all-projections-routed exit
Phase 1: Mᵢ_passed → TaskCreate[all certificate-passing initial mismatches] → pending(Σ) → SelectNext(pending, F, Σ) → Mₛ → Qc(F-scoped Mₛ, evidence) → Stop → A  -- register all certificate-passing initial mismatches, surface selected mismatch with fit basis [Tool]; reached only when Mᵢ_passed ≠ ∅
Phase 2: A → (A ∈ {Confirm, Adapt}: adapt(A, R) → R' [mutating — transformative revalidation] | A = Dismiss: R' := R [non-mutating adjudication — no adapt]) → TaskUpdate → (mutating branch only: Eval(R', X) → Mₑ? → ∀m ∈ Mₑ: bind_kind(m) → certify(m, registry) → (status = pass) → Mₑ_passed → TaskCreate[all Mₑ_passed] → pending(Σ) → AssessFit(R', X, pending) → F' → Λ.fit_map := F') -- adapt mutates the Eval target (transformative revalidation) and triggers the re-scan + registration-time certify of emerged mismatches; Dismiss leaves R unchanged and breeds no Mₑ (no re-scan on the Dismiss branch) [Tool]
Phase 2 → route_away (mismatch-local): certify(m).status = route        -- an emerged mismatch a sibling deficit owns → emit RoutePair.target, drop m from registration; re-scan continues
Phase 2 → split (pre-certify): KindBinding.atomicity = non-atomic  -- emerged compound mismatch → split into atomic sub-mismatches, re-bind_kind + certify each (same re-scan pass); never deferred/registered as a compound
Phase 2 → defer (mismatch-local): certify(m).status = ambiguous  -- emerged overlapping (atomic) mismatch → ONE bounded narrowed-scope re-assessment at the fixed re-scan (R', X) (deterministic-identical → one attempt) → pass (→ registered) / route (→ Λ.routed) / terminal-residual (record m in Λ.residual), re-certify BEFORE registration

── LOOP ──
Transformative revalidation (NON-MONOTONE): this loop mutates the very object its detector evaluates. adapt produces R', and Eval(R', X) re-targets the detector at the mutated result — so an adaptation can BREED new mismatches Mₑ that did not exist before. This is the opposite of distill's claim-preserving side (distill's repairs add resolution means or excise released bookkeeping in place, never mutating what the record asserts — monotone over asserted claims; the contextualize ↔ distill boundary). "Transformative revalidation" labels the ADAPT path; non-mutating adjudication (Dismiss, or routing a mismatch to a sibling deficit) is contextualize-internal — it does not mutate R — and is distinct from distill's claim-preserving territory.
After Phase 2 (mutating branch only — A ∈ {Confirm, Adapt}): re-scan R' against X for remaining AND newly emerged mismatches. The Dismiss branch is non-mutating (R' := R), breeds no Mₑ, and triggers no re-scan.
Bind + certify each newly emerged mismatch at registration (fail-closed): only certificate-passing emerged mismatches (Mₑ_passed) are registered into pending(Σ); a routed mismatch is handed to its sibling deficit (/gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill); a non-atomic compound mismatch is split into atomic sub-mismatches and re-certified; an atomic ambiguous mismatch gets its one bounded re-assessment at the fixed re-scan (R', X) → pass / route / terminal-residual, before registration. AssessFit classifies tracked mismatches but never suppresses them.
Recompute F over pending(Σ) before selecting the next surfaced mismatch, even when Mₑ_passed = ∅.
If pending(Σ) non-empty: return to Phase 1 (SelectNext by severity, then FitRank, then oldest registered task).
If adjudicated(R', X): all tasks resolved (completed or dismissed) → convergence.
progress(Λ) MAY REGRESS: because re-scan over a mutated R' can register newly certified mismatches, the completed/total ratio is non-monotone — this is the signature of the transformative-revalidation side, not an error.
User can exit at Phase 1 (dismiss all remaining, or Esc).
Continue until: contextualized(R') OR user ESC (EarlyExit, not ContextualizedExecution).
Mode remains active until convergence or explicit user exit (Esc).
On user ESC: present partial transformation trace ranging over Σ.history ∪ Λ.routed ∪ Λ.residual as accumulated so far, then declare remaining pending(Σ) mismatches as unresolved residual.
Convergence evidence: At adjudicated(R', X), present transformation trace ranging over ALL dispositioned mismatches — Σ.history ∪ Λ.routed ∪ Λ.residual (routed and terminal-residual mismatches never enter pending(Σ)/Σ.history, so the trace must range over all three): for each (m, _) ∈ Λ.state.history (adapted/dismissed), show (ApplicationDecontextualized(m) → adaptation_result(m)); for each (m, target) ∈ Λ.routed, show (m → routed_to(sibling_deficit, target)) — NOT ApplicationDecontextualized(m), since status = route means a sibling deficit owns m (it was never in-scope for ApplicationDecontextualized); for each m ∈ Λ.residual, show (m → terminal_residual(unattributable)) — surfaced for the user as a residual the certificate could not attribute. Convergence is demonstrated, not asserted.

── CONVERGENCE ──
applicable(R', X) = ∀ aspect(a, R', X) : warranted(a, R', X)
warranted(a, R, X) = correct(R) ∧ fits(R, X)                -- correctness AND contextual fit required (not material conditional)
adjudicated(R', X) = ∀ aspect(a, R', X) : warranted(a, R', X) ∨ dismissed(a) ∨ routed(a) ∨ terminal_residual(a)
routed(a)          = ∃ m ∈ Λ.routed : aspect(m) = a    -- the mismatch on aspect a failed the certificate (status = route) and was handed to a sibling deficit; backward misfit is adjudicated by routing, not by in-place adaptation. aspect is a String label, so this disjunct discharges by label equality — it assumes aspects stay stable and uniquely labelled across the R→R' trajectory; a transformative re-scan could in principle surface a new R'-aspect colliding on a routed label, a documented low-probability assumption, not foreclosed by the type
terminal_residual(a) = ∃ m ∈ Λ.residual : aspect(m) = a  -- the mismatch on aspect a stayed ambiguous after its ONE bounded re-assessment at the fixed detection state ((R, X) for Mᵢ, (R', X) for Mₑ); unattributable (neither cleanly ApplicationDecontextualized-owned nor a sibling's), excluded from pending(Σ), adjudicated by being surfaced as a non-blocking residual (not adapted in-place, not silently dropped — Surfacing over Deciding)
contextualized(R') = adjudicated(R', X)
trivial convergence (all-routed): when Mᵢ ≠ ∅ but Mᵢ_passed = ∅ AND every flagged aspect resolved to ROUTED or TERMINAL-RESIDUAL — aspect-keyed via routed(a)/terminal_residual(a) over the atomic (post-split) aspects, not raw Mᵢ membership — (no deferred-pending, pending(Σ) = ∅), adjudicated(R, X) holds by the routed(a)/terminal_residual(a) disjuncts for every flagged aspect (and warranted for the rest) — R is unadapted and contextualized(R) holds. This is the Phase 0 → deactivate (all-routed) path. DEFERRED mismatches do NOT satisfy this: they are not in Λ.routed, so the routed(a) disjunct does not cover them; a deferred mismatch first gets its one bounded re-assessment (Phase 0 → defer) to pass (→ pending(Σ)), route (→ Λ.routed), or terminal-residual before any convergence claim. Distinct from the no-mismatch case (Mᵢ = ∅, every aspect warranted from the start) — here aspects were flagged but all belong to sibling deficits
certificate gate:  every registered mismatch carried certificate.status = pass (fail-closed, at registration) — routed/ambiguous mismatches never entered pending(Σ), so a contextualized R' is assembled only from in-scope (ApplicationDecontextualized-owned), fit-certified adaptations; backward misfit was handed forward (/gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill), not adapted in-place
-- stratification: applicable(R', X) ⊆ adjudicated(R', X)
-- operational proxy: ∀ task resolved (status ∈ {completed, dismissed}) ⟹ adjudicated(R', X) ⟹ contextualized(R')
progress(Λ) = 1 if |total_tasks| = 0 else |resolved_tasks| / |total_tasks|   -- resolved_tasks = tasks with status ∈ {completed, dismissed} (matches the ContextualizedExecution resolution contract)   -- total_tasks = 0 (Mᵢ = ∅, or Mᵢ≠∅∧Mᵢ_passed=∅ trivial convergence via routing) is fully converged, not undefined — the Mᵢ = ∅ leg only after the Rule 9 zero-mismatch confirmation (Confirm, or Reopen whose focused re-scan stays ∅); otherwise NON-MONOTONE: may regress when re-scan over the mutated R' registers newly certified mismatches (transformative-revalidation signature)

── TOOL GROUNDING ──
-- Realization: Constitution → TextPresent+Stop; Extension → TextPresent+Proceed
Eval   (sense)   → Internal analysis (no external tool)
ZeroMismatchConfirm (constitution) → present (conditional: Mᵢ = ∅; zero-mismatch finding + reasoning; Confirm/Reopen(aspect) — Rule 9)
reopen_relay (extension) → TextPresent+Proceed (conditional: Reopen(aspect) focused re-scan still yields Mᵢ = ∅ → relay the still-zero finding and deactivate; one attempt per aspect, basis = the focused Eval re-scan)
reopen_focus (track) → Internal state update (set at Reopen(aspect), threads the focused Eval re-scan, cleared after the re-scan — consumed once, either arm)
bind_kind (sense)   → Internal analysis (capture each detected mismatch as a KindBinding {label, positive_predicate, evidence, origin ∈ {seed, emergent}, atomicity}; non-atomic mismatch → split before certify)
certify (extension) → Internal analysis (fail-closed DeficitFitCertificate; fit of KindBinding.positive_predicate against the documented sibling-deficit scopes — each sibling protocol's deficit: declaration plus the registered deficit inventory (sibling-deficit nodes; epharmoge has no outgoing routing edge, so the fit rests on the deficit-scope declarations, not edge topology): owner = ApplicationDecontextualized when in-scope; status = pass | route | ambiguous; basis = the cited deficit-scope fit, shown at the mismatch's Phase 1 surfacing. Relay (Extension) because the fit is grounded in a citable source and an unclear fit returns status = ambiguous → defer, never a user gate. Runs at registration time — within Phase 0 for Mᵢ, within Phase 2 re-scan for Mₑ — BEFORE the mismatch enters pending(Σ))
AssessFit (sense) → Internal analysis (no external tool)
Qc     (constitution)    → present (mandatory; Esc key → loop termination at LOOP level, not an Answer)
adapt  (transform) → Edit, Write (result adaptation based on user direction)
                    -- (transform): tool call that changes existing artifacts; medium-agnostic (files, analysis text, generated content)
route  (extension)   → TextPresent+Proceed (certificate.status = route → emit the matching RoutePair.target as a backward-misfit recommendation: decision gap → /gap, missing pre-execution fact → /inquire, undefined convention/dependency ownership → /bound, portability to an absent recipient → /distill; the routing target is read off the matched sibling-deficit scope, basis cited)
Mᵢ/Mₑ (track)   → TaskCreate/TaskUpdate (mismatch tracking with framing visibility; only certificate-passing mismatches are registered)
converge (extension)  → TextPresent+Proceed (convergence evidence trace; proceed with contextualized execution)
esc      (extension)  → TextPresent+Proceed (partial transformation trace + unresolved-mismatch residual declaration; terminate as EarlyExit, not ContextualizedExecution)
Seam transition to a declared next protocol (extension) → TextPresent+Proceed (fires at deactivation/handoff: a user-declared chain naming the next protocol, or a composition edge this SKILL.md declares, settles the next move — proceed directly to it, citing that settling source; every Constitution gate inside Epharmoge and inside the next protocol fires unchanged)

── MODE STATE ──
Λ = { phase: Phase, R: Result, X: Context,
      fit_map: F, state: Σ, active: Bool, cause_tag: String,
      reopen_focus: Option(String),   -- the zero-mismatch Reopen(aspect) focus the Phase 0 scan missed; threads into the focused re-scan, cleared after it; a focused re-scan that still yields Mᵢ = ∅ presents its finding as relay and deactivates (one attempt per aspect — deterministic-identical re-runs are not re-gated, per the re-assessment idiom)
      routed: List<(Mismatch, Protocol)>,   -- backward-misfit mismatches handed forward (never entered pending(Σ))
      deferred: Set(Mismatch),   -- ATOMIC mismatches with certificate.status = ambiguous, parked for their ONE bounded narrowed-scope re-assessment against the fixed detection state — (R, X) for an initial mismatch (Phase 0), (R', X) for an emerged mismatch (Phase 2 re-scan) (a non-atomic mismatch is split pre-registration, never parked here; status ≠ pass — never entered pending(Σ)). After the bounded attempt each resolves to pass / route / terminal-residual, so "no deferred-pending" (≡ no mismatch still awaiting its bounded re-assessment) always becomes reachable
      residual: Set(Mismatch) }   -- TERMINAL-residual mismatches: stayed ambiguous after their one bounded re-assessment (unattributable). Never entered pending(Σ); adjudicated by terminal_residual(a), surfaced as a non-blocking residual at convergence
Σ = { history: List<(Mismatch, A)>, scan_count: Nat }
                 -- each Mismatch in history carries its kind_binding + certificate (object_ref = Mismatch)
-- Certificate invariant: ∀ m ∈ pending(Σ) : m.certificate.status = pass (fail-closed — routed/ambiguous mismatches never enter pending(Σ))

── COMPOSITION ──
*: product — (D₁ × D₂) → (R₁ × R₂). registered dependency edges preserved. Mismatch-domain resolution emergent via session context.
certificate-before-registration ∘ transformative-revalidation: the fail-closed certificate order composes with the NON-MONOTONE loop — when a Confirm/Adapt answer mutates R and Eval(R', X) breeds emergent mismatches Mₑ, EACH Mₑ is independently bind_kind'd + certified at re-scan registration (Phase 2) before it can enter pending(Σ). So only in-scope (ApplicationDecontextualized-owned) Mₑ_passed register, even as R mutates across cycles; the certificate gate holds under mutation-induced revalidation. Dual to elicit's "Monotonicity ∘ shared-backbone": elicit composes the order with an IMMUTABLE substrate, contextualize with a MUTATING R — both preserve certificate-before-commit.

Core Principle

Applicability over Correctness: When AI detects that a technically correct result may not fit the actual application context, it surfaces the mismatch with evidence rather than assuming the result is adequate. Correctness is necessary but not sufficient — contextual fit determines whether the result serves its purpose.

Formal predicate: correct(R) ∧ ¬warranted(R, X) — the output is correct but not warranted in this context (Dewey's warranted assertibility; Ryle's knowing-how vs knowing-that).

Mode Activation

Conditional Activation Prerequisite

This protocol is conditional. AI-guided activation (Layer 2) requires operational experience with Aitesis (④) to validate the pre/post context fitness axis. Until this prerequisite is satisfied, Epharmoge exists as a formal specification only and must not auto-activate via Layer 2.

Activation criteria: Observed pattern of "context gathered but application mismatched" in Aitesis inference operational data.

User-invocable activation (Layer 1 / /contextualize) is always available regardless of this prerequisite.

Activation

AI detects applicability mismatch after execution OR user calls /contextualize. Detection is silent (Phase 0); surfacing always requires user interaction via Cognitive Partnership Move (Constitution) (Phase 1).

Application decontextualized = the result is technically correct but may not fit the actual application context.

Gate predicate:

decontextualized(R, X) ≡ correct(R) ∧ ∃ aspect(a, R, X) : ¬warranted(a, R, X)

Activation layers:

• Layer 1 (User-invocable): /contextualize slash command or description-matching input. Available regardless of conditional gate.
• Layer 2 (AI-guided): Post-execution heuristic detection within SKILL.md. Subject to conditional gate.

Priority

When Epharmoge is active:

Supersedes: Default post-execution patterns (move to next task without applicability check)

Retained: Safety boundaries, tool restrictions, user explicit instructions

Action: At Phase 1, present mismatch evidence via Cognitive Partnership Move (Constitution).

• Epharmoge completes before proceeding to next task
• Loaded instructions resume after applicability is verified or dismissed

Trigger Signals

Heuristic signals for applicability mismatch detection (not hard gates):

Signal	Detection
Environment assumption	Result assumes environment state not verified in current context
Convention mismatch	Result follows general best practices but project has local conventions
Scope overflow	Result addresses more or less than the observed use case requires
Temporal context	Result applies to a version, state, or phase that may have shifted

Cross-session enrichment: Prior session indices from the hypomnesis store (prior-session recall indices), when present, may seed the Phase 0 scan; the constitutive judgment remains with the user.

Revision threshold: The mismatch's kind label is an open emergent type (Axis); the listed domains are only the illustrative example set. When accumulated mismatch detections across 3+ sessions cluster around a recurring domain outside the current examples, that domain warrants adding to the example set. When a cited example consistently mis-fires (3+ sessions of classification false negatives clustered on it), it warrants rewording or dropping from the examples. Neither move changes the type — the taxonomy stays open; only the detection scent is recalibrated.

Skip:

• User provided explicit, detailed specification and result follows it exactly
• User explicitly says "looks good" or "proceed" after execution
• Trivial or mechanical execution (formatting, typo fixes, rename)
• Read-only / exploratory task — no result to evaluate
• Same (aspect, description) pair was dismissed in current session (session immunity)

Mode Deactivation

Trigger	Effect
All mismatch tasks completed (adapted or dismissed)	Proceed with contextualized result
No mismatches detected (Phase 0 zero-mismatch finding confirmed)	Execution stands as-is
Mismatches detected but none in-scope (Mᵢ ≠ ∅ ∧ Mᵢ_passed = ∅ ∧ adjudicated(R, X) ∧ no deferred-pending ∧ pending(Σ) = ∅)	Trivial convergence — every flagged aspect is routed to a sibling deficit or terminal-residual (unattributable); emit the routing recommendations (/gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill), surface any terminal-residual, and deactivate without adapting R (adjudicated by routing/terminal-residual, not in-place adaptation). DEFERRED mismatches (ambiguous, atomic) get ONE bounded re-assessment → pass / route / terminal-residual before any convergence (a non-atomic mismatch is split pre-registration, not deferred); only a set with no in-scope mismatch (each routed or terminal-residual) fires this path. Distinct from the no-mismatch-detected row above: aspects WERE flagged but none is in-scope for adaptation
User Esc key	EarlyExit (not ContextualizedExecution): present partial transformation trace + declare pending mismatches as unresolved residual, then accept result without further applicability review

Mismatch Identification

Mismatches are identified across emergent dimensions. The domains listed below are frequently-verified examples that carry detection scent — NOT a closed taxonomy; any context-fit mismatch the morphism admits is in-scope whether or not it matches a listed example.

Frequently-Verified Mismatch Domains (illustrative, not exhaustive)

These are recurring domains worth scanning first — examples, not a closed set. A mismatch in any other emergent domain is equally in-scope; the rows below carry detection scent and a sample phrasing, they do not bound the type.

Domain (example)	Detection scent	Sample phrasing
Convention	Result follows general patterns but project has local conventions	"This follows best practices, but your project uses [local pattern]"
Environment	Result assumes environment state that differs from actual operating context	"This assumes [env state], but your context has [actual state]"
Audience	Result targets a different audience than the actual consumers	"This is written for [assumed audience], but [actual audience] will use it"
Dependency	Result interacts with components whose constraints weren't considered	"This depends on [component] which has [constraint not considered]"

Off-example mismatch detection: The example domains are illustrative, not exhaustive — a mismatch need not match any of them. Detect an off-example mismatch when:

• The applicability gap spans multiple example domains
• User dismisses all example-domain mismatches but the result still exhibits contextual misfit
• The execution context involves domain-specific fitness criteria that resist the example domains

Any such off-example mismatch must satisfy morphism ApplicationDecontextualized → ContextualizedExecution; the fail-closed deficit-fit certificate (Phase 0 / Phase 2 re-scan) enforces this at registration. Backward-misfit boundary (routed away, not adapted in-place) — per RoutePair (TYPES): /gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill (the contextualize ↔ distill boundary).

Each mismatch is characterized by:

• aspect: The specific facet where result and context diverge
• description: What specifically doesn't fit
• evidence: Observable indicator from the result or context
• severity: Impact on applicability

Severity

Level	Criterion	Action
Critical	Result actively harmful in current context	Must resolve before using result
Significant	Result suboptimal or partially inappropriate AND mismatch carries demonstrable behavioral impact (downstream-decision impact, runtime divergence, gate-trajectory change)	Surface to user for judgment
Minor	Result adequate but could fit better, OR mismatch lacks demonstrable behavioral impact (covers both structural-only and suboptimal-without-impact cases)	Surface with pre-selected Dismiss option

Behavioral-impact qualifier (Significant criterion): structural-change extent alone — line count, file count, scope size — is insufficient grounds for Significant; the mismatch must produce a demonstrable downstream behavioral consequence. Assessment scope: demonstrability is evaluated against the visible task graph and downstream protocol activations within the current session — not speculative future sessions, hypothetical user trajectories, or out-of-session consequences. When the visible session offers no anchor for the predicted consequence, the mismatch defaults to Minor (¬behavioral_impact disjunct). See Rule 12.

When multiple mismatches are identified, surface in severity order (Critical → Significant → Minor). Only one mismatch surfaced per Phase 1 cycle.

Protocol

Phase 0: Applicability Checkpoint (Silent)

Evaluate result against application context. This phase is silent — no user interaction, except the conditional zero-mismatch confirmation gate (Rule 9) when no mismatch is detected.

1. Scan result R against context X: environment state, conventions, use case scope, temporal validity, user constraints
2. Check applicability: For each aspect, assess whether correct(R) ∧ fits(R, X) (i.e., warranted(R, X))
3. Bind + certify each detected mismatch at registration (fail-closed): For each candidate mismatch, set m.kind_binding = { label, positive_predicate, evidence, origin ∈ {seed, emergent}, atomicity }; if atomicity = non-atomic (the mismatch bundles two distinct aspects), split before certify. Then m.certificate = certify(m.kind_binding, registry) where the registry is the documented sibling-deficit scope set — each sibling protocol's deficit: declaration (its SKILL.md deficit: line) plus the registered deficit inventory (which sibling deficits exist as nodes — epharmoge has no outgoing routing edge, so routing rests on the deficit-scope declarations, not edge topology):
   • status = pass — the mismatch's positive predicate fits ApplicationDecontextualized (certificate owner = ApplicationDecontextualized) and no sibling deficit claims it. The mismatch is eligible for registration.
   • status = route — a sibling deficit owns the mismatch (backward misfit, not a context-fit question). Emit the matching RoutePair.target as a recommendation and drop the mismatch from registration (record it in Λ.routed); the scan continues with the remaining mismatches. Route targets per RoutePair (TYPES): /gap (GapUnnoticed), /inquire (ContextInsufficient), /bound (BoundaryUndefined), /distill (ContextTethered, the contextualize ↔ distill boundary).
   • atomicity = non-atomic — compound mismatch (two distinct aspects) → split into atomic sub-mismatches and re-run bind_kind + certify on each (same Phase 0 pass); never registered or deferred as a compound.
   • status = ambiguous (atomic) — overlapping deficit fit → ONE narrowed-scope re-assessment at the fixed Phase-0 (R, X) (AI-side; no user question — Phase 0 stays silent), then re-certify. (R, X) is fixed, so re-assessing is deterministic-identical → bounded to one attempt: pass / route / (if still ambiguous) terminal-residual (unattributable, never registered, surfaced as residual, non-blocking). Never register under ambiguity.
4. Assess fit: Build ApplicabilityFitMap over the certificate-passing mismatches (Mᵢ_passed) from warranted aspect evidence, conflicts, dependencies, adaptation options, and bounded open questions
5. If all aspects warranted: present finding per Rule 9 before concluding (Epharmoge not activated)
6. If certificate-passing mismatches remain: record Mᵢ_passed with aspect, description, evidence, severity (per Rule 12 — behavioral-impact qualifier assessed against current-session task graph), origin=Initial, kind_binding, certificate, and fit-map placement — proceed to Phase 1

Information source: The result R compared against observable context X — non-circularity with Aitesis (Rule 6).

Registration-time certificate (not an up-front gate): The certificate fires per mismatch at registration, not as an up-front gate, and the certify step is relay (Extension). Full account — including the elicit/bound comparison and basis-citation timing — at Rule 17(a)-(b).

Backbone discipline: One canonical KindBinding → DeficitFitCertificate → value-space schema shared across protocols; epharmoge's local instantiation is detailed at Rule 17(d).

Scan scope: Completed result, observable context (structure, conventions, constraints), session context. Does NOT re-execute or modify files.

Fit-map scope: Pre-gate support for mismatch selection and adaptation direction only — classifies, never creates or suppresses tasks (Rule 15; open-condition bound at UX Safeguards: Fit-map cap).

Phase 1: Mismatch Surfacing

Register all certificate-passing mismatches (Mᵢ_passed) as Tasks (TaskCreate), then present the next pending mismatch selected by SelectNext via Cognitive Partnership Move (Constitution). Routed/ambiguous mismatches never enter pending(Σ) (fail-closed certificate).

Task format:

TaskCreate({
  subject: "[Mismatch:aspect] description",
  description: "Evidence and context for this mismatch (severity: X)",
  activeForm: "Surfacing [aspect] mismatch"
})

Constitution presentation yields turn for user response.

Surfacing format (natural integration with execution completion):

Present the mismatch findings as text output:

• Done. One thing to verify about applicability:
  • Mismatch: [Specific mismatch description]
  • Evidence: [what in the result and what in the context diverge]
  • Fit basis: [what already fits, what conflicts or depends, and any open condition tied to this mismatch that could change this adaptation decision]
  • Deficit-fit basis: [which sibling-deficit scope confirmed this mismatch is in-scope for ApplicationDecontextualized rather than owned by a sibling deficit — the cited deficit-scope fit from the certificate; relay, deterministic against the documented scopes (per the certify TOOL GROUNDING promise)]

Then present:

How would you like to handle this applicability mismatch?

Options:
1. **Confirm** — yes, this needs adaptation: [brief direction prompt]
2. **Dismiss** — acceptable as-is: [stated assumption about context fit]

If adaptation direction is evident, materialize Adapt(direction) as a concrete option:

3. **[Specific adaptation]** — [what would change and why]

This is a contextual materialization of Adapt(direction) — the formal answer type remains Adapt, with the direction pre-populated from AI analysis.

Design principles: Each option leads to a concrete next step. Evidence-grounding (Rule 4), current-mismatch framing and natural post-execution integration (UX Safeguards), and the Dismiss option's stated fitness assumption (template above) all apply here.

Phase 2: Result Adaptation

After user response:

1. Confirm(mismatch): Mark mismatch as confirmed, apply adaptation using Edit/Write tools → TaskUpdate (completed)
2. Adapt(direction): Apply user-directed adaptation to result R' using Edit/Write tools → TaskUpdate (completed)
3. Dismiss: Mark mismatch as dismissed (non-mutating — R' := R, no adaptation), note fitness assumption accepted → TaskUpdate (completed)

After a mutating answer (Confirm/Adapt — these adapt R into R') — re-scan: (a Dismiss answer is non-mutating, R' := R: no Eval(R', X), no Mₑ, no re-scan — skip straight to the task-completion check at the end of this list)

• Re-evaluate R' against X for remaining AND newly emerged mismatches
• Bind + certify each emerged mismatch at registration (fail-closed) — this happens at the Phase 2 re-scan (AFTER the user's Confirm/Adapt answer has already mutated R into R'), temporally separated from the Phase-0 certification of Mᵢ: for each m ∈ Mₑ, set m.kind_binding and m.certificate = certify(m.kind_binding, registry) (same registry, same pass | route | ambiguous statuses as Phase 0). Register only certificate-passing emerged mismatches (Mₑ_passed) with origin=Emerged(adapted_aspect); a status = route mismatch is recorded in Λ.routed and handed to its sibling deficit (/gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill); a non-atomic compound mismatch is split into atomic sub-mismatches and re-certified; an atomic status = ambiguous mismatch gets its one bounded re-assessment at the fixed re-scan (R', X) → pass / route / terminal-residual, before registration. Do not filter the certificate-passing set by fit-map category.
• Recompute ApplicabilityFitMap over all pending mismatches before selecting the next mismatch, even when Mₑ_passed = ∅
• If remaining tasks non-empty: return to Phase 1 (surface next mismatch via SelectNext: severity, then FitRank, then oldest registered task)
• If all tasks completed: execution complete with contextualized result
• Log (Mismatch, A) to Σ.history, increment Σ.scan_count

Re-scan trigger (transformative revalidation — NON-MONOTONE): Adaptation MUTATES R into R', and Eval(R', X) re-targets the detector at the mutated result, so changed R' may exhibit new mismatches not present in the original result. This is the transformative-revalidation / mutates-its-own-detector-target side of the dual axis — the opposite of distill's claim-preserving side (distill may edit the record in place but never mutates what it asserts). Always re-scan after each adaptation — any adaptation may introduce mismatches in dimensions unrelated to the original aspect; progress(Λ) may therefore regress (expected, not an error). Non-mutating adjudication (Dismiss, or routing a mismatch to a sibling deficit) does not mutate R and is contextualize-internal.

Chain discovery: When Mₑ emerges from an adaptation, the origin = Emerged(parent_aspect) field records the causal chain. This enables:

• Chain visibility: user sees which adaptations spawned new mismatches (a framing signal — which adaptation opened which follow-on, not a progress count)
• Convergence monitoring: chains that grow beyond 3 levels suggest a structural issue worth surfacing explicitly

Intensity

Level	When	Format
Light	Minor severity mismatches only	Constitution interaction with Dismiss as default option
Medium	Significant severity, evidence is clear	Structured Constitution interaction with evidence
Heavy	Critical severity, multiple interacting mismatches	Detailed evidence + adaptation options

UX Safeguards

Rule	Structure	Effect
Gate specificity	activate(Epharmoge) only if correct(R) ∧ ∃ ¬warranted(a, R, X)	Prevents false activation on well-fitting results
Mismatch cap	One mismatch per Phase 1 cycle, severity order	Prevents post-execution question overload
Session immunity	Dismissed (aspect, description) → skip for session	Respects user's dismissal
Current-mismatch framing	Phase 1 surfaces the mismatch currently in play (which applicability aspect is being judged this cycle) — a framing readout, not an [N addressed / M] completion count	User recognizes which aspect is being judged without parsing a progress tally; granular progress stays in session
Deterministic selection	SelectNext orders pending mismatches by severity, FitRank, then oldest registered task	Removes unordered Set indexing from user-facing surfacing
Fit-map cap	depends/open only when observable evidence could change adaptation or dismissal	Prevents broad contextual caveat lists
Early exit	User can dismiss all at any Phase 1	Full control over review depth
Cross-protocol cooldown	suppress(Epharmoge) if Aitesis.resolved_in_same_scope ∧ overlap(Aitesis.domains, Epharmoge.aspects)	Prevents same-scope pre+post stacking
Cooldown scope	Cooldown applies within recommendation chains only; direct /contextualize invocation is never suppressed	User authority preserved
Natural integration	"Done. One thing to verify:" pattern	Fits completion flow, not interrogation

Rules

1. AI-guided, user-judged: AI detects applicability mismatch; user judges whether adaptation is needed via Cognitive Partnership Move (Constitution) (Phase 1)
2. Recognition over Recall: Present structured options via Cognitive Partnership Move (Constitution) — structured content reaches the user with response opportunity — Constitution interaction requires turn yield before proceeding
3. Applicability over Correctness: When result is correct but contextually mismatched, surface the mismatch — do not assume correctness implies fitness
4. Evidence-grounded: Every surfaced mismatch must cite specific observable evidence from both result R and context X, not speculation
5. Convergence persistence: Mode active until all mismatch tasks are completed (resolved or dismissed)
6. Non-circularity: Information source is the result itself compared against context, not pre-execution context scans (independence from Aitesis)
7. Context-Question Separation: Output all analysis, evidence, and rationale as text before presenting via Cognitive Partnership Move (Constitution). The question contains only the essential question; options contain only option-specific differential implications. Embedding context in question fields = protocol violation
8. Convergence evidence: Present transformation trace before declaring adjudicated(R', X); per-mismatch evidence is required
9. Zero-mismatch surfacing: If Phase 0 scan detects no context mismatches, present this finding with reasoning for user confirmation
10. Option-set relay test (Extension classification): If AI analysis converges to a single dominant option (option-level entropy→0 — Extension mode of the Cognitive Partnership Move), present the finding directly. Each Constitution option must be genuinely viable under different user value weightings. Options sharing a downstream trajectory collapse to one; options lacking an on-axis trajectory surface as free-response pathways rather than peer options
11. Gate integrity (Safeguard tier): The defined option set is presented intact — injection, deletion, and substitution each violate this invariant. Type-preserving materialization (specializing a generic option while preserving the TYPES coproduct) is distinct from mutation.
12. Significant requires demonstrable behavioral impact: Severity = Significant requires that the mismatch produces a demonstrable behavioral consequence — downstream-decision impact, runtime divergence, gate-trajectory change. Structural-change extent (line count, file count, scope size) alone is insufficient grounds — categorize as Minor when behavioral impact is undemonstrated. This guards against false-positive gating arising from conflation of structural-change extent with applicability impact, where the Option-set relay test (Rule 10) would otherwise apply only ex post via user challenge
13. Plain emit discipline: User-facing emit (Phase 2 surfacing prose, convergence traces, gate options, and any text shown to the user) uses everyday language to reduce the user's cognitive load — every emit token should carry decision-relevant meaning, not project-internal overhead. SKILL.md formal-block vocabulary — variable names with subscripts, Greek-rooted terms in narrative, formal type labels inline, and code-style backtick tokens — stays in the formal block. What the user reads is the action, observation, or question in their idiom.
14. Round-local salience bundling: Each user-facing round bundles the current judgment, its nearest evidence, and the differential implication that matters for the next move. Keep adjacent material together so the user can recognize the decision without context-switching; defer background, distant context, and unrelated findings to pre-gate text, convergence traces, or later cycles.
15. Applicability fit map is support only: Use ApplicabilityFitMap to scope which mismatch is surfaced and which adaptation direction is practical. It classifies already detected mismatches and must not create, suppress, or terminalize mismatch tasks.
16. All certificate-passing mismatches remain tracked: Initial and emerged mismatches that pass the fail-closed deficit-fit certificate are registered before fit-map prioritization. Fit categories affect selection order and fit-basis wording only; they never remove a registered mismatch from convergence accounting. (The certificate is the one legitimate pre-registration filter — Rule 17; a routed/ambiguous mismatch is handed forward or split, distinct from fit-map suppression, which Rule 15 prohibits.)
17. Registration-time deficit-fit certificate, dual-axis transformative revalidation: Before a detected mismatch enters pending(Σ), it is dispatched through the shared meta-backbone pipeline — KindBinding → fail-closed DeficitFitCertificate → value-space, in that strict order, at registration of both Mᵢ (Phase 0) and Mₑ (Phase 2 re-scan). (a) Registration-time, NOT dispatch-first: the certificate attaches per mismatch at registration time — mismatch detection stays AI-side, there is no up-front kind gate. This is the cycle-emergent counterpart to elicit's per-projection certificate, distinct from bound's dispatch-first up-front sync (which exists only because BoundaryMap is a multi-consumer router). (b) Fail-closed certificate: certificate.status = pass strictly precedes registration and surfacing; status = route drops the mismatch and hands it to the sibling deficit's protocol (per RoutePair, TYPES: /gap, /inquire, /bound, /distill); a non-atomic mismatch is split into atomic sub-mismatches before certify (never deferred/registered as a compound), and status = ambiguous triggers ONE narrowed-scope re-assessment at the fixed detection state ((R, X) for Mᵢ at Phase 0; (R', X) for Mₑ at the Phase 2 re-scan) → pass / route / terminal-residual (the deterministic-identical re-assessment bounds it to one attempt), re-certified before registration. The certificate is generated by fitting the mismatch's positive predicate against the documented sibling-deficit scopes — each sibling protocol's deficit: declaration plus the registered deficit inventory (sibling-deficit nodes; routing rests on the deficit-scope declarations, not epharmoge edges); the certify step is relay (Extension — the deficit-fit is grounded in the cited deficit-scope declarations, an unclear fit returns status = ambiguous → defer rather than a user gate; basis cited at Phase 1 surfacing). (c) Dual axis — transformative revalidation (NON-MONOTONE): contextualize sits on the transformative side of the dual axis. adapt MUTATES R into R', Eval(R', X) re-targets the detector at the mutated result, and this can BREED emergent mismatches Mₑ that did not exist before — so re-scan is mandatory and progress(Λ) may regress. This is the opposite of distill's claim-preserving side (distill's repairs add resolution means or excise released bookkeeping in place, never mutating what the record asserts — monotone over asserted claims; the contextualize ↔ distill boundary). "Transformative revalidation" labels the ADAPT path only; non-mutating adjudication (Dismiss, or routing a mismatch to a sibling deficit) is contextualize-internal and does not mutate R. (d) Backbone discipline: the schema is ONE canonical definition shared across protocols; epharmoge instantiates only object_ref (= Mismatch), local_value_space (= the {Confirm, Adapt, Dismiss} coproduct), and the guard routing targets — same field names, same fail-closed statuses, same certificate-before-registration order.
18. Formal blocks are runtime-normative: This protocol's formal blocks — those defined in its Definition code block above — are LLM-facing and constitutive of protocol identity: they type the prose and carry the operational contract executed at runtime. A reduced or single-shot realization carries every one of them through as runtime contract, since each block is the type that constitutes the protocol — preserving the blocks keeps the protocol intact. How its symbols render to the user is a separate emit-layer concern (see Plain emit discipline).
19. Seam relay on declared continuation: when a user-declared chain or a composition edge this SKILL.md declares names the next protocol, the between-protocol seam after Epharmoge's convergence is relay (Extension) — proceed directly, citing the settling source (the chain declaration or the named edge). This governs only the seam BETWEEN protocols; every Constitution gate inside Epharmoge and the next protocol fires unchanged, and the user can redirect at any turn.